# A Brief Tribute to Law & Order

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [January 13, 2020, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355 "2020-01-13T15:45:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2020, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/101 "2020-01-27T05:57:22Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> I remember one episode in which Jack McCoy promised the suspect that he would receive immunity. (Saying something like, “I promise you that the Manhattan district attorney’s office or the Office of the New York County District Attorney will not prosecute you.”) After receiving a confession, McCoy stepped aside as the guy was arrested and charged by the Brooklyn district attorney.

I think that was Ben Stone. The suspect had some connections for Russian organized crime and Stone made a deal with the guy’s Russian-born attorney that New York _County_ would not prosecute. Brooklyn is King’s County.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superdude](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superdude/32/13450_2.png) [@Superdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superdude)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2020, 6:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/102 "2020-01-27T06:08:47Z")

</div>

> [@Charlie\_Wayne](#):
>
> I just watched the episode “Fools for Love”. It was a very good episode. But there were many big differences between the episode and the reality.
> 
> I suppose that is certainly nothing to complain about. After all, the producers of the show have entirely different objectives than the news media who reported this story. But I thought some of you might enjoy hearing some of the differences between the reality and the TV show.
> 
> In reality, the female got hardly any jail time - my memory is that she was only jailed for about 2 or 3 years. Her lawyer got her an incredible deal. On the show, she got 25 years to life - which is what I think most people would have said she deserved.
> 
> They could have easily turned this into 2 or 3 episodes. I remember another case there were 3 episodes when some killer who resembled Ted Bundy left a trail of bodies all across the country. He and Abbie Carmichael got into some very nasty personal exchanges. This guy was the mother of all creeps. I’m pretty certain they did 3 episodes on this story line but so far as I remember, they never showed us how it all ended. Maybe I missed an episode somewhere along the way.
> 
> In an case, back to “Fools for Love”, they did a good job showing how incredibly creepy the female was. But they portrayed the male as a very normal individual which I found very strange because he had a very long history of raping and killing girls. He began his spree - which lasted about 6 years - when he was quite young and lived in an area called Scarborough. He raped girls for many years (maybe 5 years) and was never caught. He was given the nickname, “The Scarborough Rapist” and it seems so incredible that he could have been raping girls for something like 5 years in the same location while holding down a full time job as an accountant and was never caught. He was only caught when he made the mistake of beating his gf and she then turned him in. All in all, a very incredible story.

In the real world, one of the girls that Bernardo and Homolka raped was Homolka’s 15 year old little sister, who died due to the drugs they sedated her with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 10:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/103 "2020-01-28T10:54:11Z")

</div>

> [@Fair\_Rarity](#):
>
> I was watching a rare episode I either missed in its original run or only saw once and completely forgot and she was distractingly bad. You can see it sometimes on the faces of the actors in her scenes. No matter how good they are, a brief moment of confusion passes over their face and then they read their lines.
> 
> Anyway, I love the series and still watch it and I still get mad at NBC for canceling it. I watched the first season of SVU and hated it. I watched CI and I mostly enjoyed it, despite it being wildly different in tone and style from time to time. I didn’t mind the LA one, but that got canceled quick and I don’t think I ever saw any of the other versions. My true favorite “spin off” is “Basic Lupine Urology” from Community.
> 
> I don’t love the first few seasons, but I liked Paul and the two cops and early Claire. I am more likely to watch something else if that’s the block on WETV on the weekends. I don’t like the guy who took over as ADA when Jack when full DA. And most of all I hate the episode where it turns out he’s maybe not really a lawyer and that episode seems to be in the heaviest rotation. His accent is terrible and distracting, but I’d rather watch him all day every day than one Rohm episode.

I found one example that IMHO constitutes some of the worst acting I have ever seen on this series. If anyone is interested, check out Season 13 Episode 24 - Smoke.

If you FF to the 30 minute mark, there is a scene with Serena, Jack McCoy and Arthur Branch in which Serena reads her lines in such a wooden manner that I have to say I have never seen worse acting on this show. I want to stress this is only my opinion and I am certainly no expert on acting to be sure. But when she reads these lines, I cannot see any emotion. It’s like a ten year old who is learning to read was speaking these lines.

The role of the female A.D.A. is so pivitol to this series, I have to ask how someone with such an incredible lack of acting skills ever got to play such a high powered role. The other women who have played this role were - again in my opinion - real standouts and I enjoyed them immensely.

So what was going on with Rohm? Does anyone know how or why she ever got this role?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LLCoolL](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/llcooll/32/3596_2.png) [@LLCoolL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LLCoolL)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 12:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/104 "2020-01-28T12:27:06Z")

</div>

> [@Andy\_L](#):
>
> …I liked some of the really twisty cases on L&O - the grandmother who hires a hitman (and it turns out she was right - her daughter-in-laws new husband did kill her son) and gets on so well with Lenny, …

Great episode. Grandma was played by Frances Sternhagen. If I recall correctly, the character agreed to plead guilty in exchange for NY law enforcement fully investigating her son’s death.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LLCoolL](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/llcooll/32/3596_2.png) [@LLCoolL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LLCoolL)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/105 "2020-01-28T12:29:07Z")

</div>

> [@Andy\_L](#):
>
> Another great Jack McCoy moment: irritated at the exclusion of evidence by the judge, McCoy asks Curtiss if he was looking for the murder weapon before he and Brisco visited the defendant’s apartment. “Yes” “How about after you left?” (McCoy ends up in jail for contempt).

Ha! That’s a good “you can’t unring the bell” example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Just_Asking_Questions)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/106 "2020-01-28T15:02:51Z")

</div>

Speaking of the Rohmbot’s acting skills, I swear there was an episode where Serena introduced herself as “Sabrina”. Did anyone else hear that? If so, what episode was it? It seemed very clear to me at the time that she said the wrong name.

Her exit from the show seemed like the producers were mocking her - “here’s a really classy way to leave the show. You’ll make a difference by coming out. It’ll be awesome!” As they snickered behind her back with a parting FU to Rohm. (It also is a slam on her law-talkin’ and cognitive skills, too. When Branch says “no” to her famous question, she accepts it! Like, “OK good the know!” She never considers he’s lying. No lawsuit will be forthcoming.)

Because they could have done a good job - there were gay-themed episodes near the end of her run, and the groundwork could have been set down for the reveal. But, nope. In one, she had an argument with Branch and she was right, but he stomped her down. I would have quit, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 4:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/107 "2020-01-28T16:05:41Z")

</div>

> [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](#):
>
> Speaking of the Rohmbot’s acting skills, I swear there was an episode where Serena introduced herself as “Sabrina”. Did anyone else hear that? If so, what episode was it? It seemed very clear to me at the time that she said the wrong name.

In another episode - I think it was maybe late Season 12 or early Season 13 - I distinctly remember Ed reading someone their rights and instead of saying,

“Anything you say may be used against you” … he said

“Anything you say will be held against you”.

I have no idea if this was intentional but I can’t believe it could be because it would certainly be grounds to blow the conviction.

I’m just curious if anyone else heard it as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/108 "2020-01-28T17:46:47Z")

</div>

> [@Charlie\_Wayne](#):
>
> I found one example that IMHO constitutes some of the worst acting I have ever seen on this series…….
> 
> …… there is a scene with Serena, Jack McCoy and Arthur Branch in which Serena reads her lines in such a wooden manner that I have to say I have never seen worse acting on this show.

That would be Every Episode she is in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/109 "2020-01-28T20:54:03Z")

</div>

> [@Gatopescado](#):
>
> That would be Every Episode she is in.

She had a weird yell-talk way of speaking. Like they gave her the direction “this thing you’re about to say is the most important thing you’ve ever said.” She never tones it down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2020, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/110 "2020-01-28T21:18:12Z")

</div>

I wonder if [this evidently accidental shooting of a 1-year-old](https://www.news8000.com/1-year-old-chicago-toddler-shot-in-parents-gun-struggle/) will turn up in SVU next season, given that the shooting was initially blamed on a criminal third party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2020, 10:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/111 "2020-01-29T10:40:05Z")

</div>

> [@Gatopescado](#):
>
> That would be Every Episode she is in.

I don’t dispute this one bit and I have nothing good to say about her acting.

But I looked her up on IMDB and was shocked to see this lady has been working steadily on all kinds of movies and TV shows ever since L&O. Most of the things she’s worked on seem to be pretty terrible. But that is no different from almost any other actor - regardless of skill. Almost every product is pretty terrible.

But this really intriques me.

What does success as an actor require if it clearly does not require any skill?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2020, 11:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/112 "2020-01-29T11:24:46Z")

</div>

Speaking of good actors and bad actors …

I just watched Season 14 Episode 9 - “Compassion” about a lady doctor who poisoned some con man and got off because she had worked all her life with children dying of cancer. The episode is called Compassion because McCoy actually softened his heart out of compassion for this woman.

The lady who played the doctor is Ann Dowd. I had never before heard anything about this actor but she pulled off one of the greatest jobs of acting I’ve ever seen on this series. The best part came at the end when she explained her position and the tears flowed down her face. Her skill at acting was just unbelievable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivylass](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/9de053/32.png) [@ivylass](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ivylass)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2020, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/113 "2020-01-29T13:05:05Z")

</div>

It’s hard to pick a favorite, but I tend to favor the older episodes. I though Logan brought a great chemistry to the scenes…like the one where he puts an unruly suspect in a chokehold and the kid dies. (Turns out he had a brain injury from being put into a headbox by a shady doctor trying to treat his autism.)

I wish Paul Sorvino had stayed longer. That episode where he’s shot by a gun-seller was incredible. And the ending where Stone says to Schiff, “She doesn’t have an uncle.” All these great actors conveying an emotion with a brow lift.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2020, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/114 "2020-01-29T14:30:01Z")

</div>

One of my favorite episodes is [Just Another Girl in the World](https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Emma_Kim). Camille Chen was fantastic as the helpless victim/seductress/murderer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Just_Asking_Questions)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2020, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/115 "2020-01-29T22:04:10Z")

</div>

> [@Annie-Xmas](#):
>
> One of my favorite episodes is [Just Another Girl in the World](https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Emma_Kim). Camille Chen was fantastic as the helpless victim/seductress/murderer.

And all we seem to see her in is commercials.

We always go “there’s Lupo’s girrrlfriend!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2020, 7:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/116 "2020-01-31T07:06:17Z")

</div>

I just watched a great episode - Season 15 Episode 14 - All in the Family.

It starred Mercedes Reuhl and although I knew she was a fine actor from her performance in, “The Fisher King”, [The Fisher King (1991) - IMDb](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101889/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_48)

I never really appreciated just how truly great she was until I saw her in this episode. Her character was married to a man in the Diamond Trade who was cheating on her and involved with some particularly nasty mobsters.

I had never seen this before, but McCoy realized she had outsmarted him and he

actually withdrew the charges against her when the trial was almost over. He knew when he was licked. Of course that had nothing to do with her acting. It was the writers who came up with that.

Nonetheless her performance was an incredible powerhouse. I want to recommend this episode to anyone who is a fan of this show or a fan of Mercedes Reuhl or just a fan of great acting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2020, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/117 "2020-01-31T15:58:11Z")

</div>

> [@Charlie\_Wayne](#):
>
> “Anything you say may be used against you” … he said
> 
> “Anything you say will be held against you”.
> 
> I have no idea if this was intentional but I can’t believe it could be because it would certainly be grounds to blow the conviction.

Why would that blow a conviction? Miranda doesn’t require extremely specific language. The NYPD has a policy for the phrasing of Miranda warnings like pretty much every PD, but deviating from it doesn’t invalidate the warning. From a quick google search it looks like the actual NYPD line is ‘can and will be used against you’, and I think the ‘mistaken’ line is actually closer to that than the ‘standard’ line.

> [@](#):
>
> You have the right to remain silent. If you give up that right, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney and to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you at no cost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2020, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/118 "2020-01-31T16:04:13Z")

</div>

I vaguely remember an episode of this or another crime drama in which the Miranda warning was either flubbed or omitted and the prosecution argued that the defendant should not have needed it. (I think the defendant in that case was either a career criminal or a lawyer himself.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2020, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/119 "2020-01-31T16:33:03Z")

</div>

> [@Pantastic](#):
>
> Why would that blow a conviction? …

I honestly don’t know.

It just sounded strange to me and I wanted to know if other people remembered it or had some opinion on whether there was some kind of joke going on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![medstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f07891/32.png) [@medstar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/medstar)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2020, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355/120 "2020-02-01T13:59:15Z")

</div>

> [@nightshadea](#):
>
> I dont know if its still around but one of the tv boards used to have a "repeat offenders " list of everyone who’d guested and L&O more than once and who tye played each time
> 
> actually, he claimed all he did for L&o was play a more serious version of a character hed played on murder she wrote and even had an ill-fated spin-off that lasted maybe 3 episodes …
> 
> supposedly the character was supposed to be more serious but he lightened it up because MSW wasn’t a “hard” toned show

“The Law and Jerry McGraw”?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-brief-tribute-to-law-order/846355.md?page=7)
