# A few points, Aspenglow, about the JFK thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-few-points-aspenglow-about-the-jfk-thread/993876>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [November 29, 2023, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-few-points-aspenglow-about-the-jfk-thread/993876 "2023-11-29T21:44:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2023, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-few-points-aspenglow-about-the-jfk-thread/993876/7 "2023-11-29T22:55:12Z")

</div>

> [@slicedalone](#):
>
> Is there much of a debate going on there, anyway?

I actually asked that in [Post 233.](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-case-against-lee-h-oswald/993643/233) I didn’t see you hurrying in to answer my question.

Frankly, by the time we got to [Post 262](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-case-against-lee-h-oswald/993643/262) it had become pretty clear to me that you were Just Asking Questions.

> Did I say I believed in a conspiracy, or any particular conspiracy? No, I maintain that there are enough errors in the WC Report, or the one lone nut theory, to make me doubt the integrity and the thoroughness of the Report and the theory. I want these discrepancies clarified, worked out, explained, and nailed down, as opposed to hand-waved away.
> 
> People are demanding that I produce an alternate (and completely satisfactory) version of the WC Report, and then boasting that since I haven’t done that, and refuse to try, I should shut up and go away, which is declaring victory in a war that was never fought.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-few-points-aspenglow-about-the-jfk-thread/993876)._
