# A Gravity Pit (for warping the SDMB and its purpose by being a bumptious prick)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 24, 2010, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721 "2010-11-24T00:41:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Meatros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Meatros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Meatros)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/21 "2010-11-24T13:31:37Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> My attempt was to ask a question about a pattern similarity noticed between gravity and the effects of 2 ships, also related to to plates and something I think is called negative energy. If anything it was a attempt to think for one self, and not take theories as truths. A thought experiment.

I don’t know what you mean by ‘truth’ - it seems to suggest that there is 100% absolute certainty in science. If this is what you think then you have a misunderstanding of science. Scientific theories are explanations.

So, right now, the best explanation of a given law, fact, phenomenon is X. Does that mean scientists are 100 percent certain of it?

No.

I suggest you read [“The Relativity of Wrong”](http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm). It’s short and will give you a better understanding of science.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> The replies show a strong bias against free thinking, a attempt to shut down those who do not conform to group think.

I’m not sure how you got this.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

It seems to me that you don’t have a strong grasp of what was being talked about. That’s fine, it’s a complicated topic - I _don’t_ have a strong grasp on it. That said, there are other posters who do have a much better grasp. Your attempt at a ‘gotcha’ was misplaced.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b782af/32.png) [@Grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grey)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/22 "2010-11-24T13:34:04Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> My attempt was to ask a question about a pattern similarity noticed between gravity and the effects of 2 ships, also related to to plates and something I think is called negative energy. If anything it was a attempt to think for one self, and not take theories as truths. A thought experiment.
> 
> The replies show a strong bias against free thinking, a attempt to shut down those who do not conform to group think.
> 
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

Yeah because nothing says hidebound blinkered thinking like a the formulation of a quantum field theory incorporating gravity. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/23 "2010-11-24T13:50:25Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> My attempt was to ask a question about a pattern similarity noticed between gravity and the effects of 2 ships, also related to to plates and something I think is called negative energy. If anything it was a attempt to think for one self, and not take theories as truths. A thought experiment.
> 
> The replies show a strong bias against free thinking, a attempt to shut down those who do not conform to group think.
> 
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

You’re funny. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/24 "2010-11-24T13:54:29Z")

</div>

I don’t always remember things about other posters, but I think I recall some general things about both posters in question; **kanicbird** is a religious nutter who brings the most bizarre, offensive religious pronouncements to innocuous threads, and if I recall correctly, **Stranger on a Train** is someone who is not very adept at the human side of the equation (by his own admission). I would expect a “just the fact, ma’am” post from **Stranger** , and that’s what we usually get; I don’t recall him being insulting to anyone just for the yuks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/25 "2010-11-24T14:00:29Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

Personally, I think we need encouragement of free thinking in religion, as a means to getting rid of religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/26 "2010-11-24T14:00:47Z")

</div>

Just chiming in to join the dog-unpiling. There are a number of people here whose individual departure would bring this place very close to the brink of uselessness, and Stranger is one of them.

I don’t really consider his reponse rude. Nonetheless, I must say I do believe that a thorough and accurate answer to an objective question is a thing of value and you do not quibble if it was delivered insensitively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/27 "2010-11-24T14:08:25Z")

</div>

> [@Meatros](#):
>
> I’m not sure how you got this.

Just look how quickly the OP was swayed by group think against me, though he initially saw a injustice against me (even sending me 2 PM’s of support). He was convinced by the masses to give up his independent observations and conclusions and accepted what others wanted him to think.

This is a major problem across all lines, scientific, religious, political. People who try to think for them self are often pier pressured to conform to the established thinking pattern, even those who initially see a injustice are quick to be swayed. Those who stand firm are labeled a nutjub of some sort.

I did appreciate the other posters in the GQ thread who did contribute honestly and I enjoyed taking it further based on their reply, such as countering drag by proposing these ‘gravity waves’ may move at the speed of light and therefor have no relativistic speed difference so no drag.

In many ways the SDMB is a great way to observe human behavior, with ‘experts’ and laypersons across many disciplines forming a society here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarmNPrickly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d78d45/32.png) [@WarmNPrickly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WarmNPrickly)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/28 "2010-11-24T14:10:32Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

But as we saw in that thread, scientists had already thought of this idea. By not being educated in science, you are simply wasting time on old previously rejected ideas. Scientists are some of the most creative people on the planet. I can gauramtee, an idea that a scientifically uneducated person such as yourself can come up with, has been already considered by scientists. The people working on these problems are some of the smartest people in the world. Yet you are so arrogant to believe that with no real science background at all, you can think of something that they can’t. It’s not science that needs to learn to think freely, it’s you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/29 "2010-11-24T14:12:04Z")

</div>

Pier pressure is also a major cause of coastal erosion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rhythmdvl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/85f322/32.png) [@Rhythmdvl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rhythmdvl)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/30 "2010-11-24T14:20:19Z")

</div>

Since he’s unlikely to be pitted anywhere else, let me just add:

Just get up and introduce yourself to the other passengers! Nobody likes a dark and shadowy figure hanging out in the background mumbling “Alfred” this and “criss-cross” that. You’re making everyone nervous. Fuckwit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/31 "2010-11-24T14:21:34Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> Just look how quickly the OP was swayed by group think against me, though he initially saw a injustice against me (even sending me 2 PM’s of support). He was convinced by the masses to give up his independent observations and conclusions and accepted what others wanted him to think.

Well, he just didn’t know enough about you and your posting history. We fought his ignorance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Meatros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Meatros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Meatros)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/32 "2010-11-24T14:27:44Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> Just look how quickly the OP was swayed by group think against me, though he initially saw a injustice against me (even sending me 2 PM’s of support). He was convinced by the masses to give up his independent observations and conclusions and accepted what others wanted him to think.

He was given evidence of prior actions on your part and it was also brought to his attention that you were simply trying to go for a gotcha.

It’s kind of ironic that you are complaining about his free thinking here when it seems as though he appraised the evidence and changed his mind accordingly.

Would you have preferred he just agree with your point of view, damn his opinion of the evidence?

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> This is a major problem across all lines, scientific, religious, political. People who try to think for them self are often pier pressured to conform to the established thinking pattern, even those who initially see a injustice are quick to be swayed. Those who stand firm are labeled a nutjub of some sort.

Perhaps, but I think it’s a bit of a stretch here. Certainly people have been martyred in the name of free thinking (bruno comes to mind), but come on, you seemed to have one thing in your mind that you wanted to accomplish with that thread despite what anyone said. I find it a bit hypocritical that you are complaining about the lack of free thinking.

The thread was okay and then you unloaded this:

"You do realize that postulating a particle may be impossible to find because no one has evidence of one, is pretty darn close to .. well lets just say it sounds very self serving. It’s very hard to find, doubtful that even your grandchildren generation will find a single one, but believe us it exists. So that’s why we haven’t found it yet, because it’s hard to find, and we know that. **I have to say that arguments about the scientific evidence of proof of God come to mind on this one.**

I did think we found micro wormholes and have seen quantum tunneling. "

How on earth is this a fair comparison? It makes the entire thread seem to be a set up to say ‘well you can’t prove X, just like I can’t prove God, therefore they are on equal footing’.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> I did appreciate the other posters in the GQ thread who did contribute honestly and I enjoyed taking it further based on their reply, such as countering drag by proposing these ‘gravity waves’ may move at the speed of light and therefor have no relativistic speed difference so no drag.

Fair enough.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> In many ways the SDMB is a great way to observe human behavior, with ‘experts’ and laypersons across many disciplines forming a society here.

Fair enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Attack\_from\_the\_3rd\_dimension](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@Attack\_from\_the\_3rd\_dimension](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Attack_from_the_3rd_dimension)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/33 "2010-11-24T14:42:51Z")

</div>

> [@Una\_Persson](#):
>
> **Stranger on a Train** is one of a diminishing group of valuable posters who actually contribute these things called _answers and content_ to the Straight Dope Message Board.

Sorry. We’ll try to do better and stop pissing about all the time.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It’s up to you to decide, do we need encouragement or discouragement of free thinking, in particularly science.

You have a reputation of not doing this. You have a reputation of warping any discussion to fit your preconceptions of religion, which are pretty odd, by the way.

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> Just look how quickly the OP was swayed by group think against me, though he initially saw a injustice against me (even sending me 2 PM’s of support). [snip]  
> In many ways the SDMB is a great way to observe human behavior, with ‘experts’ and laypersons across many disciplines forming a society here.

Yup. In this case, it was just like a one prof leaning over to the other prof and saying “That’s the guy that drags every conversation over to abortion/Jesus/9-11/other monomania. He’ll act like he’s interested in what he’s asking about, but he’s not - usually he’s just wasting your time. I just thought you should know”.

> [@Rhythmdvl](#):
>
> Since he’s unlikely to be pitted anywhere else, let me just add:
> 
> Just get up and introduce yourself to the other passengers! Nobody likes a dark and shadowy figure hanging out in the background mumbling “Alfred” this and “criss-cross” that. You’re making everyone nervous. Fuckwit.

Everyone plays Mornington Crescent in their own way. Some play for real.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/34 "2010-11-24T14:55:07Z")

</div>

As for what some of you call the ‘gotcha’ that I was accused of, it was really a reply to the gotcha that Stranger on a Train gave.

A common tactic used to shut down non-conforming thinking is stating we already have our answer, in this case the theory of relativity and the like, no need for your input. Basically that is the method used by SoaT, and very anti-free thinking - stuff like this has kept science in the dark ages and has kept organized religion in power btw.

I countered with your theory also depends on a almost mythical particle, that is defined in such a way that it is acceptable that it may never be found, this is what is holding that theory together. And yes I did related it to belief in God as that is what I am familiar with and saw a correlation, though it was a response, not a intent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosstone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/22d042/32.png) [@Bosstone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosstone)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/35 "2010-11-24T14:59:48Z")

</div>

If you can’t go through a single thread without bringing up topic X, you really have no place to be talking about freedom of thought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/36 "2010-11-24T15:06:38Z")

</div>

> [@WarmNPrickly](#):
>
> But as we saw in that thread, scientists had already thought of this idea. By not being educated in science, you are simply wasting time on old previously rejected ideas. Scientists are some of the most creative people on the planet. I can gauramtee, an idea that a scientifically uneducated person such as yourself can come up with, has been already considered by scientists. The people working on these problems are some of the smartest people in the world. Yet you are so arrogant to believe that with no real science background at all, you can think of something that they can’t. It’s not science that needs to learn to think freely, it’s you.

So we are not suppose to ask questions? and if a pattern is seen not suppose to ask why this pattern will not hold? We are suppose to just accept what they say blindly? and just assume that they already though of everything I could ever came up with?

Really are you sure you want to be stating this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/37 "2010-11-24T15:09:32Z")

</div>

> [@Bosstone](#):
>
> If you can’t go through a single thread without bringing up topic X, you really have no place to be talking about freedom of thought.

Um, do you really want comment on this. It makes no logical sense, just muddying the waters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 3:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/38 "2010-11-24T15:43:54Z")

</div>

**Kanicbird** is a proponent of “free-thinking”-free of evidence, free of logic, free of reason, free of the scientific method, and free of intellectual honesty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nancarrow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c37758/32.png) [@Nancarrow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nancarrow)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/39 "2010-11-24T15:54:51Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> My attempt was to ask a question about a pattern similarity noticed between gravity and the effects of 2 ships, also related to to plates and something I think is called negative energy.

[naive mode]I think that’s great. The more members of the lay public that take an interest in the grand theories of how the universe works at its most basic levels, the more respected the enterprise of theoretical physics becomes. We should encourage these kind of threads, they’re all about becoming more aware of the universe. **Stranger on a Train** ’s response seems a bit mean. He must be a big grouch.

> [@](#):
>
> If anything it was a attempt to think for one self, and not take theories as truths. A thought experiment.

Er, okay, that seems quite… commendable. Excuse me a second, one of my detectors has just started beeping. Huh, weird, it’s the ‘kook’ one and it’s on amber. Maybe it needs new batteries.

> [@](#):
>
> The replies show a strong bias against free thinking

Yikes, it’s flashing red and gone to the ‘fire alarm’ level!

> [@](#):
>
> a attempt to shut down those who do not conform to group think.

And now it’s not working at all, but… there seems to be a burning smell.

Aw. I hope I don’t need a new one. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2010, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721/40 "2010-11-24T16:26:12Z")

</div>

I _do_ think it’s a bad idea to enter GQ threads assuming that the OP is looking for a “gotcha” moment.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-gravity-pit-for-warping-the-sdmb-and-its-purpose-by-being-a-bumptious-prick/561721.md?page=3)
