# A hypothetical question.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [December 9, 2011, 7:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600 "2011-12-09T07:47:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King\_Bobo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c68b51/32.png) [@King\_Bobo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/King_Bobo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 7:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/1 "2011-12-09T07:47:50Z")

</div>

So - a person makes a charitable contribution to a non-profit organization - a goodly sum -say $1000+

Said charity is known to publish all donations in their annual review.

Above donation is missed from the list of donors and upon questioning, the donors name is added post-haste.

Suppose the donors name is not correct?  
Suppose the reason for donation is not right  
Should the donor be asked if a tax-exempt receipt is required?

Asking for info for 2010 -2011 years stuff in the US.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King\_Bobo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c68b51/32.png) [@King\_Bobo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/King_Bobo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 7:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/2 "2011-12-09T07:59:18Z")

</div>

> [@King\_Bobo](#):
>
> So - a person makes a charitable contribution to a non-profit organization - a goodly sum -say $1000+
> 
> Said charity is known to publish all donations in their annual review.
> 
> Above donation is missed from the list of donors and upon questioning, the donors name is added post-haste.
> 
> Suppose the donors name is not correct?  
> Suppose the reason for donation is not right  
> Should the donor be asked if a tax-exempt receipt is required?
> 
> Asking for info for 2010 -2011 years stuff in the US.

All is just supposed,of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 8:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/3 "2011-12-09T08:04:27Z")

</div>

Not sure what you mean by tax-exempt receipt. I’m not a tax guy but my understanding is that a charitable contribution can sometimes be counted as a deduction from income for tax purposes, but it is not exempt. In any event, I think a profuse apology should be offered for the error, and a receipt for the deduction automatically given in all cases.

From the donor’s point of view, I would assume that in the event of an IRS audit, a copy of the canceled check would be ample evidence to prove the donation was made if the charity was non-cooperative about providing a receipt for some reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King\_Bobo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c68b51/32.png) [@King\_Bobo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/King_Bobo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 8:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/4 "2011-12-09T08:12:24Z")

</div>

Oak,

Not sure if anything should be “by right” - maybe my poor wording - just wondering if, among my several questions, a tax receipt for my contribution should have been offered?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 8:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/5 "2011-12-09T08:13:28Z")

</div>

Where I am the receipt would be offered at the point of donation, not later - so inclusion or non inclusion in the published list would be irrelevant. In fact, I’d think such a thing could be a tax dodge of some sort if you used that as the basis for claiming tax relief.

And here, you get double relief for donating to registered charities (with a cap of course)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King\_Bobo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c68b51/32.png) [@King\_Bobo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/King_Bobo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 8:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-hypothetical-question/605600/6 "2011-12-09T08:23:19Z")

</div>

> [@bengangmo](#):
>
> Where I am the receipt would be offered at the point of donation, not later - so inclusion or non inclusion in the published list would be irrelevant. In fact, I’d think such a thing could be a tax dodge of some sort if you used that as the basis for claiming tax relief.
> 
> And here, you get double relief for donating to registered charities (with a cap of course)

The hypothetical was a donation to a US charity. Donor has no standing in the US.  
Question was for the status of the US charity.

I did indeed make a contribution to a US charity - but am not a usian.
