# A Netflix reboot of Little House on the Prairie on the way

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** netflix\
**Created:** [January 30, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647 "2025-01-30T22:40:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/1 "2025-01-30T22:40:55Z")

</div>

I can’t wait to see this told from a 21st century, streaming service perspective. “You’ve seen _Girls Gone Wild_, now prepare yourself for girls gone wilder. Laura Ingalls Wilder.”

> **[‘Little House on the Prairie’ Reboot Set at Netflix](https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/little-house-on-the-prairie-reboot-netflix-1236289832/)**
>
> Netflix has greenlit a new TV adaptation of "Little House on the Prairie," the beloved book series written by Laura Ingalls Wilder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dolphinboy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dolphinboy/32/330_2.png) [@dolphinboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dolphinboy)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2025, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/2 "2025-01-30T22:53:39Z")

</div>

I’ll pass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2025, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/3 "2025-01-30T22:57:59Z")

</div>

deleted

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tzigone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Tzigone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tzigone)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 11:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/4 "2025-01-31T11:58:23Z")

</div>

Very meh on the original (watched a bit in syndication when nothing else was on), and not interested in the sequel series. I expect some will be outraged it isn’t like the original, nevermind that the original itself was different than the books (or that the books were at the very least edited to a political/societal agenda). Of course, it could just end up being bad (or good) tv, regardless of (dis)similarity to the original. The article didn’t really give any details on what to expect out it.

There really, really have been so many reboots/renewals/relaunches of old shows in recent years. There have always been some, but many more now. Admittedly, the market is so segmented - so many more shows now than in the network or even cable days. And it’s a hook (and for renewal type series you even theoretically have a built-in audience of older viewers). Kinda makes me think of comic books (for a long while now) and how they keep expanding the “families” but don’t have all that much success with newer independent/unconnected heroes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hogarth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hogarth/32/1773_2.png) [@hogarth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hogarth)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 12:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/5 "2025-01-31T12:42:52Z")

</div>

I’m not sure why this idea is any worse than the 2019 version of **Little Women** , which was favourably received.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/6 "2025-01-31T13:21:53Z")

</div>

Have they casted it yet? Might be fun to do casting picks.

**‘Father’ Wilder (the Michael Landon character):** Jason Momoa  
**Laura Ingalls Wilder:** Sydney Sweeney

Eh, that’s all I got. I know there’s a couple other sisters, a mom, and a ‘mean girl’, I think, but I didn’t really watch the show.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hermione1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d07c76/32.png) [@Hermione1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hermione1)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/7 "2025-01-31T13:40:59Z")

</div>

Exactly. What’s wrong with more than one adaptation of a work? After all, if we were only allowed one screen adaptation per work the only _Ben Hur_ we’d be left with would have been the silent version! Ditto with _The Wizard Of Oz._ No Humphrey Bogart version of _The Maltese Falcon_ either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/8 "2025-01-31T14:30:09Z")

</div>

I could wish that the directors go back to the original source material, which had so much death and disaster in it that much of it was edited out by Laura herself. The inability of ‘Pa’ to settle in one place for long was the major contributor to this life of near-constant adventure, until the long-suffering Mrs.Ingalls finally insisted on a living in a house, in a town. A realistic depiction of life on the barely-settled prairie, with no money, no social services, and barely any neighbors, in the 1870’s, would be worth watching.

But I’m dreaming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/9 "2025-01-31T14:38:19Z")

</div>

> [@Tzigone](#):
>
> Very meh on the original (watched a bit in syndication when nothing else was on), and not interested in the sequel series.

Seriously, how much could happen in a little house the prairie that would keep viewers interest over an extended series? I might watch an episode or two just to see what they created, but that would be pretty much it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 2:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/10 "2025-01-31T14:51:24Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmine](#):
>
> Seriously, how much could happen in a little house the prairie that would keep viewers interest over an extended series? I might watch an episode or two just to see what they created, but that would be pretty much it.

The Ingalls were constantly moving. The ‘little house’ was one of maybe a dozen places they lived in Laura Ingalls’ childhood. They lived in (and ran) a hotel, they lived with and also near relatives in Wisconsin and New York state, they lived in a dugout (aka a hole in the ground), they lived in a log cabin … during this time Laura’s brother died at nine months of age, her older sister got viral meningitis and went blind, their crops completely failed, including everything being eaten by locusts, they almost were consumed in a prairie fire, they nearly froze to death, they all nearly died from malaria (a traveling doctor found them all lying near death in their cabin). Just off the top of my head, as I read the books some twenty years ago to my daughter, and could never bear the tv series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/11 "2025-01-31T14:58:28Z")

</div>

> [@Hermione1](#):
>
> Exactly. What’s wrong with more than one adaptation of a work? After all, if we were only allowed one screen adaptation per work the only _Ben Hur_ we’d be left with would have been the silent version! Ditto with _The Wizard Of Oz._

I’m in agreement. It’s perfectly fine for someone else to come along and adapt a work according to their vision. For _Dune_ alone we have Lynch’s version, the Sci Fi television movie, and the most recent Villenueve version.

> [@Ulfreida](#):
>
> I could wish that the directors go back to the original source material, which had so much death and disaster in it that much of it was edited out by Laura herself. The inability of ‘Pa’ to settle in one place for long was the major contributor to this life of near-constant adventure, until the long-suffering Mrs.Ingalls finally insisted on a living in a house, in a town.

As we all saw with Gus Van Sant’s _Psycho,_ there’s little reason to produce a new version if they’re just going to rehash the original, so going back to the original source material sounds like a good idea to me. I don’t think audiences in 2025, or whenever the show premiers, are going to be interested in the same thing audiences were back in 1974. So let’s see Pa’s long suffering family put up with his wanderlust.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/12 "2025-01-31T15:11:07Z")

</div>

> [@Ulfreida](#):
>
> The ‘little house’ was one of maybe a dozen places they lived in Laura Ingalls’ childhood. They lived in (and ran) a hotel, they lived with and also near relatives in Wisconsin and New York state, they lived in a dugout (aka a hole in the ground), they lived in a log cabin

Wow, then the title is rather misleading! It should be, “Many Houses on and off of the Prairie”. LOL

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tzigone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Tzigone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tzigone)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/13 "2025-01-31T15:11:14Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> oing back to the original source material sounds like a good idea to me. I don’t think audiences in 2025, or whenever the show premiers, are going to be interested in the same thing audiences were back in 1974. So let’s see Pa’s long suffering family put up with his wanderlust.

I’m not sure the debt, hunger and other privation would be well-suited to “enduring themes of hope and optimism” - but there’s the original material of the books (what people love) and the reality (which I doubt most would). I was thinking about the Waltons here but I never watched that show, know only one character’s name (well, he was named after dad) and don’t know how material lack played in with familial love there or really even what the themes of the show were.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/14 "2025-01-31T15:18:33Z")

</div>

Laura Ingalls Wilder portrayed her family as filled with strength, warmth and joy even in adversity, and I am sure that this was also true. Without it, they could not have survived such deprivation.

There’s a story in one of the later books, when Laura began teaching school at age 15, rooming with a settler and his wife because her own family’s house was too far away from the school. The wife, in a memorable scene, hated and feared the isolated life she’d been brought to, and gradually went mad, finally attacking her husband (or maybe Laura, I forget) with a butcher knife. That probably wasn’t included in the tv series.

Most of what I have described is in the books, which were written for children, so I think it would be possible to dramatize them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gregorio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/fbc32d/32.png) [@gregorio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gregorio)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/15 "2025-01-31T15:25:54Z")

</div>

The coldest and bleakest I’ve felt is when I read “The Long Winter” aloud to my daughter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/16 "2025-01-31T15:28:30Z")

</div>

> [@dolphinboy](#):
>
> I’ll pass.

Same. I’ll put this one in the “They’re out of original ideas” file.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/17 "2025-01-31T15:55:16Z")

</div>

> [@Tzigone](#):
>
> I’m not sure the debt, hunger and other privation would be well-suited to “enduring themes of hope and optimism” - but there’s the original material of the books (what people love) and the reality (which I doubt most would).

Themes of hope and optimism without adversity just gives the audience a silly, saccharine snooze fest of a story. And from what I understand of the original material, there’s a good dose of reality in there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tzigone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Tzigone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tzigone)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/18 "2025-01-31T16:03:13Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> Themes of hope and optimism without adversity just gives the audience a silly, saccharine snooze fest of a story. And from what I understand of the original material, there’s a good dose of reality in there.

Sure, you need adversity. But for hope and optimism to actually stay in play, you need some “victories” too. I don’t feel you can have bad thing after bad thing after bad thing and nothing ever go the characters’ way, either. Example (from hazy memory, so I may have this flat out wrong, but for fiction, it still works for an example), I understand in the book there’s a section where Pa works hard, pays off their debt (that was the adversity), and the girls get new dresses. While in reality, he couldn’t pay off their debt and they snuck out of town undercover of darkness to not be noticed by those they owed the debt to. One is a story that give a more hopeful/optimistic feel than the other. Though, of course, love and family loyalty can be present in both cases.

Of course, maybe the _next_ place was better and things improved (at least for them). But if they didn’t, you start wonder if there’s a reason for optimism (except mental well-being).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/19 "2025-01-31T16:14:04Z")

</div>

What’s wrong with reboots? A lot of Shakespeare’s comedies were reboots of decades old material. It’s a valid form of entertainment.

I might watch it if it was gritty and true to the source material or better yet the true story told accurately to history. It would be significantly better than that cleaned up saccharine shit chowder that Landon made.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647/20 "2025-01-31T16:17:16Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> I might watch it if it was gritty and true to the source material

Well, it is Netflix and not NBC, so I can see death, hunger, pain and suffering being put front and center.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-netflix-reboot-of-little-house-on-the-prairie-on-the-way/1013647.md?page=2)
