# A question about renormalization

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-question-about-renormalization/847997>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 15, 2020, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-question-about-renormalization/847997 "2020-02-15T23:29:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EastUmpqua](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eastumpqua/32/6025_2.png) [@EastUmpqua](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EastUmpqua)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2020, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-question-about-renormalization/847997/41 "2020-02-26T03:38:15Z")

</div>

> [@74westy](#):
>
> For eschereal, that’s a tradition.

Good to know 🤠

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EastUmpqua](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eastumpqua/32/6025_2.png) [@EastUmpqua](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EastUmpqua)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2020, 3:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-question-about-renormalization/847997/42 "2020-02-26T03:54:03Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Wikipedia, in that case, is wrong. The limit for which we have experimentally corroborated results is _much_ larger than that.

I found this… and I realize I need to check Wikipedia sources better… [https://www.quora.com/Is-there-anything-smaller-than-a-Planck-length-1?redirected\_qid=15383346#!n=12](https://www.quora.com/Is-there-anything-smaller-than-a-Planck-length-1?redirected_qid=15383346#!n=12)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-question-about-renormalization/847997.md?page=2)