# A Smackdown of Confederate General/Hero Robert E. Lee

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 19, 2014, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527 "2014-07-19T13:24:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/61 "2014-07-20T14:00:26Z")

</div>

> [@Dale\_Sams](#):
>
> And not to come off as a Confederate apologist, but from their POV Fort Sumter was Confederate land and occupied by a force that refused to yield Confederate property.
> 
> And I’m sure no one here doubts that Lincoln would have fired the first shot had the South not done it for him. Where and when, I’m not sure.

How do you know that? Lincoln tried to make it clear that he had to resupply the federal base at Fort Sumter and this was not an act of war. Notice how Castro has never tried to impose his rule on Guantamo.

I have long wondered what would have happened had the CFA had simply gone on as though they were a sovereign state, not attacking, just ignoring the US. Suppose it had gone on for ten years. Fifty years. The two states would have gone their separate ways and they would have seceded de facto if not de jure. But would the difference have mattered?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/62 "2014-07-20T14:25:23Z")

</div>

> [@Baker](#):
>
> If I remember correctly there was only one person executed for war crimes after the American Civil war, and that was the commandant of the infamous Andersonville prison.

Two guerrilla raider leaders were also hanged.

The commander, incidentally, was Heinrich “Henry” Wirz, and although some aspects of his trial were a bit shady the evidence that he committed at least several murders is pretty overwhelming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/63 "2014-07-20T14:43:10Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> How do you know that? Lincoln tried to make it clear that he had to resupply the federal base at Fort Sumter and this was not an act of war. Notice how Castro has never tried to impose his rule on Guantamo.
> 
> I have long wondered what would have happened had the CFA had simply gone on as though they were a sovereign state, not attacking, just ignoring the US. Suppose it had gone on for ten years. Fifty years. The two states would have gone their separate ways and they would have seceded de facto if not de jure. But would the difference have mattered?

If the Confederate hotheads had restrained themselves & the Union had not gone to war–slavery would have continued longer. The Emancipation Proclamation did not establish racial equality in the USA (ha!) but, at least, that line was drawn. It mattered to the slaves & their descendants.

I can understand Lincoln’s desire to reunite the country after the War–by avoiding mass hangings. But I find the ongoing reverence for the oh-so-distinguished Lee silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/64 "2014-07-20T16:07:09Z")

</div>

> [@WordMan](#):
>
> Fascinating, as has been the thread thus far. So it sounds like you are saying that Lee supported a wrong cause (Confederacy = slavery = wrong), but it was more complex that just that, so traitor does not apply?
> 
> I am not sure what I am hearing you think is “the stupidest shit you’ve ever read”? From a “winners write history” standpoint, a losing general who betrayed the winning government to fight for the losing side is, by definition, a traitor. I can see why it may not have made sense to act on that from a reconciliation standpoint, but the assertion is legit in a black and white way that need not factor in the complexities of turbulent times.

Simply put whenever someone brings up Lee as a historical figure and says a,b and c about him a certain percentage of people will just shout “traitor!” Regardless of anything else that is said about him they will come back with, “but traitor!” It’s a simplistic and incomplete look at the man.

As for the letter being stupid, it’s an attempt to shoehorn someone’s current political belief into pseudo historical context. Saying that not executing Lee caused the Teaparty is a freshman high school view of history.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/65 "2014-07-20T16:17:03Z")

</div>

> [@Loach](#):
>
> It’s a simplistic and incomplete look at the man.

Pick anyone who has committed any sort of heinous act and this statement applies.  
It’s silly to say “Oh sure he did X, Y, and Z, but he rationalized it thusly and he was a good son to his dear mother!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tim-n-va](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tim-n-va/32/3001_2.png) [@tim-n-va](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tim-n-va)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/66 "2014-07-20T16:45:34Z")

</div>

> [@zoid](#):
>
> Pick anyone who has committed any sort of heinous act and this statement applies.  
> It’s silly to say “Oh sure he did X, Y, and Z, but he rationalized it thusly and he was a good son to his dear mother!”

And that is the barrier for the whole issue. One side doesn’t see Lee as heinous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WordMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e8c25b/32.png) [@WordMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WordMan)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/67 "2014-07-20T16:56:05Z")

</div>

> [@tim-n-va](#):
>
> And that is the barrier for the whole issue. One side doesn’t see Lee as heinous.

Curious: do you/others believe that fighting to defend slavery was wrong? Or is that fundamental question simply not available due to turbulent times and complexities?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/68 "2014-07-20T16:57:11Z")

</div>

Well if you want to say he was correct in his actions that certainly is an opinion.  
My point was that it doesn’t make a ton of sense to acknowledge that he was in the wrong and then try to point out his good points as well. Every single person is a complicated collection of ideas and attributes. We still hold them responsible for their actions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blindboyard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blindboyard/32/2833_2.png) [@blindboyard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/blindboyard)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/69 "2014-07-20T18:15:37Z")

</div>

> [@zoid](#):
>
> Except one was fighting to free his people from repression and the other was fighting to keep another people under repression.  
> Little things like that just so happen to matter to some folks.

In 1774 slavery was efffectively abolished in England. In 1775 the Americans rose in armed revolt. In 1776 they issued their UDI. This is not a coincidence.

And it worked, the USA slave state allowed slavery for decades longer than Britain allowed slavery anywhere in the Empire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/70 "2014-07-20T18:30:44Z")

</div>

Which is true, but conveniently ignores that slavery had been okey-dokey among the Brits since Roman times. So, they had it for, what? A thousand years or so? But they renounced it, completely, maybe 20 years or a little less before our civil war settled the matter here. The Brits aren’t much of a role model in this matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/71 "2014-07-20T20:03:08Z")

</div>

> [@blindboyard](#):
>
> In 1774 slavery was efffectively abolished in England. In 1775 the Americans rose in armed revolt. In 1776 they issued their UDI. This is not a coincidence.
> 
> And it worked, the USA slave state allowed slavery for decades longer than Britain allowed slavery anywhere in the Empire.

The American colonies were not “England.” They were colonies & treated differently than the mother country–taxation without representation, etc. Slavery wasn’t abolished throughout the British Empire until 1843, although it had _mostly_ been abolished in 1833. The King, ministers & Parliament who opposed American independence didn’t give a fuck about slaves–the English abolition movement began _after_ the Revolution.

Most of our Revolutionary firebrands came from New England, where slavery never became as important to the economy as it did in the South. Before the Revolution, many New Englanders & some in the Middle Colonies (beside the Pennsylvania Quakers) were turning against slavery. By 1800, most of the Northern states had ended it.

It’s shameful that the new country was formed without ending slavery Lincoln thought the Civil War was a judgment on the whole country for that sin. Even some Southern Founders felt it was wrong & somehow hoped it might fade away. It didn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/72 "2014-07-20T20:53:31Z")

</div>

I don’t understand why the fact that Lee supported his state over his own conscience and morality is supposed to be a positive thing. Is it admirable to aid a murderer or rapist because you’ve been friends for a long time?

Granted, I’m still not sure execution would have been the best course of action. But there definitely needed to be a large amount of repudiation and not the veneration he has received. You want to honor him as good at what he did, fine, but only after you’ve established that what he did was wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/73 "2014-07-21T02:17:52Z")

</div>

Ulysses S. Grant may have said it best:

“Whatever his feelings, they were entirely concealed from my observation; but my own feelings, which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter [proposing negotiations], were sad and depressed. I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse. I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dale\_Sams](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/779978/32.png) [@Dale\_Sams](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dale_Sams)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/74 "2014-07-21T03:25:19Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Ulysses S. Grant may have said it best:
> 
> “Whatever his feelings, they were entirely concealed from my observation; but my own feelings, which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter [proposing negotiations], were sad and depressed. I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse. I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”

I was JUST about to post that I suppose it’s a “Good thing” the South’s main reason for secession was so vile. A large number of people may blather about ‘state’s rights’, but thanks to the internet, that myth is easily squashed.

A Civil War based on ethnic conflicts or a military coup would make the US a very different place right now.

Edit: and if anything, this thread has got me wanting to watch the Ken Burns mini-series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/75 "2014-07-21T03:26:47Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Ulysses S. Grant may have said it best:
> 
> “Whatever his feelings, they were entirely concealed from my observation; but my own feelings, which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter [proposing negotiations], were sad and depressed. I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse. I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”

Thank you **Trinopus**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WordMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e8c25b/32.png) [@WordMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WordMan)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/76 "2014-07-21T11:41:00Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Ulysses S. Grant may have said it best:
> 
> “Whatever his feelings, they were entirely concealed from my observation; but my own feelings, which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter [proposing negotiations], were sad and depressed. I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse. I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”

Thoughtful and measured. Speaks well of Grant and a commitment to the long-term reconciliation of the states. Not sure it challenges the POV held by the letter-writer in the OP, merely chooses a higher road.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dale\_Sams](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/779978/32.png) [@Dale\_Sams](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dale_Sams)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/77 "2014-07-21T17:41:18Z")

</div>

> [@WordMan](#):
>
> Thoughtful and measured. Speaks well of Grant and a commitment to the long-term reconciliation of the states. Not sure it challenges the POV held by the letter-writer in the OP, merely chooses a higher road.

Grant for a long time, and possibly still was held to be one of the worst Presidents. I wonder if deeper analysis would show he was just \*\*\*\*ed by the power hungry around him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don\_t\_Call\_Me\_Shirley](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f4b2a3/32.png) [@Don\_t\_Call\_Me\_Shirley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Don_t_Call_Me_Shirley)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/78 "2014-07-21T19:59:56Z")

</div>

I’m interested in the OP’s reasoning as to how Lee was a “traitor to his oath as an officer in the United States Army.” Lee resigned his commission in the United States Army prior to any belligerent acts. I’m not aware of anyone ever being held to their oath as an officer after their resignation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doctor\_Jackson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctor_jackson/32/32_2.png) [@Doctor\_Jackson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doctor_Jackson)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/79 "2014-07-21T20:02:27Z")

</div>

> [@WordMan](#):
>
> Curious: do you/others believe that fighting to defend slavery was wrong? Or is that fundamental question simply not available due to turbulent times and complexities?

What I/others believe today has absolutely no bearing on what happened then. I certainly believe that slavery is wrong and the concentration of melanin in a person’s skin has no bearing on their worth. That is what my parents and grandparents taught me. If I had been raised from birth to belive that this were not the case, as had my parents, grandparents, etc. and I lived in a society where the macroeconomics depended on free labor - what would I believe then? I don’t know, and you can’t know. IOW, context is everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527/80 "2014-07-21T20:21:45Z")

</div>

Never mind. 'Twas a long-resolved sidebar.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-smackdown-of-confederate-general-hero-robert-e-lee/693527.md?page=5)
