[QUOTE=Kid_A]
So…how about the CFL? Predictions?
[/QUOTE]
Looking forward to the season starting, actually. I was at McMahon Stadium already for a Calgary-Edmonton exhibition game, and I glad to say that the Stamps annihilated the Eskimos. Now, if that would only happen in the real season, Calgary might have a chance.
[QUOTE=Le Ministre de l’au-delà]
Re: rep by pop; I have been struggling to prove or disprove a statement from a friend, to wit; PEI was guaranteed a ferry link when it joined in 1871, this was re-written with the completion of the Confederation Bridge. Was PEI guaranteed a fixed number of seats (4) as well? Can someone confirm or deny?
[/QUOTE]
Yes to both questions.
1. Ferry / Fixed Link
When PEI joined Confederation in 1873 (not 1871 - that was BC), it did so under the Terms of Union between Canada and PEI. The Terms of Union are part of the Constitution of Canada.
One provision in the Terms of Union was:
When the Confederation Bridge was being considered, the federal government and PEI agreed to a constitutional amendment on this point, the Constitution Amendment Proclamation, 1993 (Prince Edward Island), which provides:
2. Representation in the Commons
When PEI first joined, it had 6 MPs, as set out in the PEI Terms of Union:
It also had 4 Senators, as set out in s. 22 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
As the country grew, PEI’s share in the population dwindled. There was a concern that each province should be guaranteed a certain number of seats in the Commons. In 1915, Canada asked the British Parliament to enact the Constitution Act, 1915 which added s. 51A to the Constitution Act, 1867
This provision is known as the “Senate floor rule”, and means that PEI is guaranteed 4 MPs.
[QUOTE=Hypnagogic Jerk]
Well, if we consider that the point of an official opposition is to serve as a government-in-waiting, then of course the Bloc can’t fulfill this role. They’ve in fact made it clear that they wouldn’t participate in any Canadian government. But I question whether the Reform could have done it any better than the Bloc, with 52 MPs and only one east of Manitoba, and no representation in the Senate. The Reform was as much of a regional party as the Bloc; I don’t think they even fielded a single candidate in Quebec in 1993.
[/QUOTE]
Obviously the Reform Party wouldn’t have done it well, or else they would have won. ![]()
But that was, in fact, the purpose of the party. That they won most of their seats in the West is no more relevant than the fact that the Liberal Party was mostly from Ontario (far more than half their MPs were from Ontario.) They were, in fact, a government in waiting.
I never said it was a tantrum. But there’s not a doubt in my mind it’s the end of the country if it happens.
No, separation isn’t popular in the rest of the country - but it very quickly will be once Confederation is effectively dissolved.