# A truck just ran over me and my bike

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [July 1, 2012, 6:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927 "2012-07-01T18:35:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Muffin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muffin/32/4341_2.png) [@Muffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Muffin)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/101 "2012-07-02T19:30:21Z")

</div>

> [@Alice\_The\_Goon](#):
>
> You’re lucky that you were hit by someone that’s ignorant of the law and feels guilty for hitting you. If I’d hit you, you’d have to take me to court to pay for your bike, and you’d lose, because you were in the wrong here.

Except that you violated the law by failing to come to a stop, which would put your attentiveness in question, so you would be help partly liable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Muffin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muffin/32/4341_2.png) [@Muffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Muffin)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/102 "2012-07-02T19:31:39Z")

</div>

> [@Sir\_T-Cups](#):
>
> Ok then what was I supposed to do? Stop? I’m going to stop at every single little restaurant outlet that a car is sitting at while they’re stopped? And I wasn’t at an intersection, nor was I “blasting” or going “the wrong way”.

What you are supposed to do is either ride your bicycle on the roadway, or walk your bicycle on the sidewalk, not ride you bicycle on the sidewalk be it with or without stopping at each driveway.

Let’s repeat that, for you don’t seem to be catching on to the concept. You are specifically prohibited from riding your bicycle on the sidewalk.

That law that you so blithely ignore is there for a good reason: to prevent reduce the frequency of collisions like the one you just had.

The same can be said for people who make rolling stops, as the truck driver did. The law that mandates stopping prior to entering a highway (including the sidewalk) is there for a good reason: to reduce the frequency of collisions like the one you just had.

It sounds like the truck driver learned his lesson. Did you? Doesn’t seem like it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@Rick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/103 "2012-07-02T19:32:19Z")

</div>

> [@tdn](#):
>
> No I didn’t. I’ve stated that the pedestrian is on the sidewalk, and the car is on the street.
> 
> I get that the bike is a vehicle, but it’s still a little fuzzy about where it belongs. It looks like it depends on the jurisdiction. In some places bikes can be on the sidewalk, in others they can’t.

Go back and read post #67 again. Seems pretty clear to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/104 "2012-07-02T19:41:55Z")

</div>

This does seem like one of those cases where a small claims judge would decide that person a is #% at fault and person b is #% at fault and award a portion of the claims accordingly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/105 "2012-07-02T19:44:32Z")

</div>

> [@Rick](#):
>
> Go back and read post #67 again. Seems pretty clear to me.

Yes it does. Got it. So the OP should have been in the street instead of on the sidewalk.

That still doesn’t excuse the driver for not looking where he was going. What if, instead of an illegal cyclist, it had been a little old lady using a walker? Or a baby? Or a freakin’ pteradactyl for that matter.

1. Look where you are going

2. Don’t hit stuff

It doesn’t matter what that stuff is. It could be an illegal alien carrying a bag of smack and a wallet full of counterfit money. Rule 2 still applies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/106 "2012-07-02T19:50:21Z")

</div>

> [@tdn](#):
>
> No I didn’t. I’ve stated that the pedestrian is on the sidewalk, and the car is on the street.
> 
> I get that the bike is a vehicle, but it’s still a little fuzzy about where it belongs. It looks like it depends on the jurisdiction. In some places bikes can be on the sidewalk, in others they can’t.

There’s nothing “fuzzy” about it at all.

Yes, the law differs from one jurisdiction to another, but that doesn’t mean that it’s “fuzzy.” It just means that you have to make sure that you know what the law is in the jurisdiction you’re in. If you’re riding in a jurisdiction where bicycles are required by law to ride in the street, it’s irrelevant that bicycles in some other jurisdiction are allowed to ride on the sidewalk.

There are plenty of different types of behavior that are regulated differently in different jurisdictions. If i am allowed to carry a handgun in Texas, it doesn’t mean that i can take my gun to Washington, D.C. I can make a right turn on red in San Francisco, but not in New York City. Two guys can get married in Iowa, but not in Indiana. If you walk away from an underwater mortgage in Georgia, the bank can sue you for the difference between what you owe and what the house is worth; in Arizona, the bank can only take the house. In Mississippi, you can record your phone conversation without getting the other party’s consent; in Massachusetts, you can’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/107 "2012-07-02T19:52:06Z")

</div>

> [@Rick](#):
>
> Not at all, it is called common sense.  
> I live in California one of if the most pedestrian friendly states there are, but if I am on a sidewalk and a car is waiting to pull out across the sidewalk I make eye contact before I step out in front. Same with alleys next to buildings. I look before stepping out.

And If I am walking across a busy intersection and some impatient driver starts nudging his car into the pedestrian crossing the street are we using common sense for not letting him bully us?

If I am cross a street and a car starts making a right on red and is not looking at the ped crossing, but at the oncoming traffic that has the light, i am not going to sit and wait all day for him to turn his head back (he won’t) I am going to cross the street and if he starts to move he’s going either get his hood slapped or I am going to jump on his hood and crease it nicely if he’s moving too fast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/108 "2012-07-02T19:56:19Z")

</div>

What’s the point of being dead right if your dead?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/109 "2012-07-02T19:57:04Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Miskatonic](#):
>
> If I am cross a street and a car starts making a right on red and is not looking at the ped crossing, but at the oncoming traffic that has the light, i am not going to sit and wait all day for him to turn his head back (he won’t) I am going to cross the street and if he starts to move he’s going either get his hood slapped or I am going to jump on his hood and crease it nicely if he’s moving too fast.

I’ll sit all day.

Trust.

Hitler.

Puppies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/110 "2012-07-02T19:58:07Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> There’s nothing “fuzzy” about it at all.
> 
> Yes, the law differs from one jurisdiction to another, but that doesn’t mean that it’s “fuzzy.” It just means that you have to make sure that you know what the law is in the jurisdiction you’re in. If you’re riding in a jurisdiction where bicycles are required by law to ride in the street, it’s irrelevant that bicycles in some other jurisdiction are allowed to ride on the sidewalk.

I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to run into stuff everywhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/111 "2012-07-02T20:00:23Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> What’s the point of being dead right if your dead?

Apparently it gives him the right to vandalize other people’s cars with impunity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/112 "2012-07-02T20:04:59Z")

</div>

Its not vandalism when you hit me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/113 "2012-07-02T20:11:46Z")

</div>

> [@tdn](#):
>
> I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to run into stuff everywhere.

You’re clearly not interested in rational discussion on this issue. I’m done with your content-free blather.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/114 "2012-07-02T20:15:35Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Miskatonic](#):
>
> Its not vandalism when you hit me.

It’s vandalism when you jump on someone’s hood.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/115 "2012-07-02T20:18:12Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> You’re clearly not interested in rational discussion on this issue. I’m done with your content-free blather.

Huh? It’s very rational and full of relevant content. The driver was looking to his left and not paying attention to where he was going. How is that not part of a rational discussion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/116 "2012-07-02T20:19:56Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> It’s vandalism when you jump on someone’s hood.

Like I told the guy who was making the illegal turn into me (on whose hood I jumped as there was really no option given his acceleration): Go tell the police, see if they agree with you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir\_T-Cups](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ed655f/32.png) [@Sir\_T-Cups](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sir_T-Cups)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/117 "2012-07-02T20:21:13Z")

</div>

> [@Alice\_The\_Goon](#):
>
> He’s going to ask the bike shop guy tomorrow to say that the bike is totaled, so that he can get a new bike.

I wasn’t going to ask him to lie because there was, in fact, noticeable frame damage

> [@Alice\_The\_Goon](#):
>
> Asserting my right to not pay for your ignorance of the law is not “hiding in the fine prints of a law”. You were in the wrong, and you not knowing the law is not a defense.

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> Have you read **Muffin** ’s citation of the relevant Alabama code? Does it change your mind at all about this incident?.

Not even a little.

> [@Dag\_Otto](#):
>
> If the bike originally came from a store like Target, the bike shop guy isn’t going to be especially interested in looking at it, but do him a big favor and tell him up front that if the bike is damaged that you willl be buying the new one from Target and not his bike shop. When you come back, post a photo of his bootprint on your ass.

Oh I know this too. But keep in mind that it wasn’t my idea to do it this way.

> [@BigT](#):
>
> There is just some stuff you don’t say to other human beings unless you are trying to start a fight, and “You’re lucky it wasn’t me, or I’d have made it even worse for you” is one of them. There is no reason to say that other than as an attack. Sometimes I wonder if people say crap like that because it gives them an excuse to be angry when the other person inevitably lashed out back.

This is what I keep trying to say in the thread. I get that it seems by the letter of the law I was technically in the wrong, and that’s great if you’re Judge Dredd, but the overarching principle of the matter is a truck hit a pedestrian. I don’t care if I was on my bike or walking or riding a damn horse, I am a pedestrian. Regardless if it’s _correct_ to say it’s my fault and I’m technically on my own with a bike it’s not _right_ to say that. I could have called the police, and did the insurance thing, and gotten witness statements (there were a bunch) and wasted 3 hours and done all that crap, but I didn’t because I assumed he would do the right thing and just get me a new bike and call it a day…  
…which he just did. I’m eating lunch and got a call that basically said “It would just be easier to get you a new bike, meet me at Wal-Mart”. So we did. He grabbed a $150 that looked like mine, I went to a $130 dollar one that I wanted and said let’s do this one cuz it’s cooler. We did. I went home. I have a new bike and can put the matter behind me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/118 "2012-07-02T20:25:34Z")

</div>

Given that you were willing to take a Wally World special, it probably was cheaper for him by far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/119 "2012-07-02T20:26:47Z")

</div>

Awesome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927/120 "2012-07-02T20:31:14Z")

</div>

> [@Sir\_T-Cups](#):
>
> I get that it seems **by the letter of the law** I was **technically** in the wrong, and that’s great **if you’re Judge Dredd**

I can imagine Homer Simpson saying this, after getting caught doing something wrong.

> [@](#):
>
> , but the overarching principle of the matter is a truck hit a pedestrian. I don’t care if I was on my bike or walking or riding a damn horse, I am a pedestrian.

😕 A person riding a bike is not a pedestrian.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-truck-just-ran-over-me-and-my-bike/626927.md?page=7)
