# A U.S. submarine struck an underwater mountain last month, the Navy says

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [November 3, 2021, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743 "2021-11-03T18:52:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SunUp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ea5d25/32.png) [@SunUp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SunUp)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/41 "2021-11-05T16:00:53Z")

</div>

> [@robby](#):
>
> Running a vessel aground or a collision at sea is uniformly career-ending in the U.S. Navy.

Fortunately that hasn’t always been true.

> **[Chester W. Nimitz | Early career](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_W._Nimitz#Early_career)**
>
> Nimitz joined the battleship Ohio at San Francisco, and cruised on her to the Far East. In September 1906, he was transferred to the cruiser Baltimore; on January 31, 1907, after the two years at sea as a warrant officer then required by law, he was commissioned as an ensign. Remaining on Asiatic Station in 1907, he successively served on the gunboat Panay, destroyer Decatur, and cruiser Denver.
> The destroyer Decatur ran aground on a mud bank in the Philippines on July 7, 1908, while under the c...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/42 "2021-11-05T16:17:02Z")

</div>

> [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](#):
>
> Like he had anything to do with where the sub was or how fast it was going. That’s just typical Navy behavior.

Well, he **was** COB at the time, and was Master Chief Sonar Tech., so presumably he was the person who had the direct responsibility to not run into things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Just_Asking_Questions)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/43 "2021-11-05T17:13:03Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> so presumably he was the person who had the direct responsibility to not run into things.

That would be the captain. (Or the OOD, but it still goes to the captain.)

I guess you could try to make a case that his failure to properly supervise led to the sonarman on watch to not spot a mountain with only passive sonar, or the helmsman to…follow orders and drive the boat into a mountain? But I don’t see it.

Whether or not the captain could have realistically missed the mountain and still complete the mission is for better sailors than me, but blaming the COB seems, well…petty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/44 "2021-11-05T17:27:26Z")

</div>

ISWYDT

Bite me, Discourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/45 "2021-11-05T17:29:05Z")

</div>

> [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](#):
>
> Like he had anything to do with where the sub was or how fast it was going. That’s just typical Navy behavior.

The Chief of the Boat (COB) arguably has more control over what is occurring on the boat than anyone but the skipper and exec, and from a practical standpoint may have more practical authority. If there was a problem with enlisted crew training, morale, or fatigue that contributed to the error, the COB almost certainly bears some responsibility.

> [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](#):
>
> I guess you could try to make a case that his failure to properly supervise led to the sonarman on watch to not spot a mountain with only passive sonar, or the helmsman to…follow orders and drive the boat into a mountain? But I don’t see it.
> 
> Whether or not the captain could have realistically missed the mountain and still complete the mission is for better sailors than me, but blaming the COB seems, well…petty.

It is not possible to accurately map geological features using “passive sonar”, e.g. acoustic monitoring any more than you can navigate a completely dark cave by ‘listening’ for walls. At most, passive hydroacoustic monitoring might hear a strong flow around a geologic feature or some seismic activity.

Since the details of the accident aren’t known, we can only speculate regarding the contributing factors to the collision but it is certainly not impossible that some measure of responsibility lies with the discipline of the enlisted crew which is the direct responsibility of the COB. Or, he may have already had a spotty record or had previously disciplinary issues (although it seems unlikely that a senior chief who had anything but a clean record would be made COB of a _Seawolf_-class sub) and this was a “last straw”. Or, maybe senior brass is just sacking everyone in sight to avoid responsibility for a crew that is underexperienced and overstretched [as happened with the grounding of the _USS Georgia_ in 2015](https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/03/01/captain-warned-crew-wasnt-ready-sub-ran-aground-investigation-shows.html) but all we can do here is speculate on what happened based upon a sparse press release and a bunch of articles written by reporters most of whom who are not even very familiar with submarine operations.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/46 "2021-11-05T17:47:32Z")

</div>

The modern sub sim Dangerous Waters modeled high-frequency short range sonar for the purposes of detecting mines, and presumably it could be used to detect underwater obstacles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/47 "2021-11-05T17:49:49Z")

</div>

They could have found it with regular active sonar, too. But they didn’t, because they thought they were in deep water. Now they are in deep something else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/48 "2021-11-05T17:53:32Z")

</div>

They were on deployment in the South China Sea. They were also operating under stealth rules, so as not to give away the fact (to China) that they were there at all. Using active sonar would have kind of defeated the purpose, though perhaps in hindsight it would have been better to give that away rather than bending the boat. But they didn’t know this would happen, obviously, so it would be hindsight to say that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_L.A](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_l.a/32/1084_2.png) [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/49 "2021-11-05T17:53:36Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> a crew that is underexperienced

I heard once that the least experienced sailors are put on the helm. I think the idea is that they just have to turn a wheel until a pointer tells them to stop, so they don’t need much experience. (Although starting to straighten out when the pointer gets to the point will cause an overshoot; so they need some experience.)

I have no idea of the veracity of what I heard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Just_Asking_Questions)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/50 "2021-11-05T17:56:42Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> Or, maybe senior brass is just sacking everyone in sight to avoid responsibility for a crew that is underexperienced and overstretched

Like I said…blame someONE, not the system. Witness the fallout from the USS McCain collision

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> It is not possible to accurately map geological features using “passive sonar”, e.g. acoustic monitoring any more than you can navigate a completely dark cave by ‘listening’ for walls.

Like I said…the COB can’t make a sonarman do what can’t be done.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/51 "2021-11-05T17:58:19Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> They could have found it with regular active sonar, too. But they didn’t, because they thought they were in deep water.

Also, you don’t use active sonar unless you are performing an exercise or trying to locate a target because it lets everyone know you are there, gives away your position, and is unnerving as fuck.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![abcdefghij](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@abcdefghij](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/abcdefghij)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/52 "2021-11-05T18:01:10Z")

</div>

> [@SunUp](#):
>
> > [@robby](#):
> >
> > Running a vessel aground or a collision at sea is uniformly career-ending in the U.S. Navy.
> 
> Fortunately that hasn’t always been true.

You don’t even have to be Nimitz. As a midshipman, I spent a month aboard the [USS Arkansas](https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/uss-arkansas-5763/). In the preceding six months, they were in a collision in the straights of Messina and then ran aground in the Panama Canal. The captain was not relieved in either case. That’s (quite) unusual, but not unheard of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![abcdefghij](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@abcdefghij](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/abcdefghij)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/53 "2021-11-05T18:02:57Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_L.A](#):
>
> I heard once that the least experienced sailors are put on the helm.

Pretty much

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slow_moving_vehicle/32/291_2.png) [@Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slow_Moving_Vehicle)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/54 "2021-11-05T18:17:43Z")

</div>

> [@ZonexandScout](#):
>
> Old technology can come to the rescue: curb feelers.

But then you have to put a furry cover and a steering knob on the helm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dinsdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/97f17d/32.png) [@Dinsdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dinsdale)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/55 "2021-11-05T19:42:56Z")

</div>

So - has anyone given any good idea yet of how deep the water was, how high the seamount, and how deep the sub was traveling?

How close does a sub intend to get to known seamounts? Just skim the top, or miss them by 100s-1000s of feet?

Also, I would assume S China Sea is a pretty significant body of water for the USN. What degree of accuracy do they have WRT the seabed topography?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robby/32/11048_2.png) [@robby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robby)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/56 "2021-11-05T19:47:16Z")

</div>

> [@SunUp](#):
>
> > [@robby](#):
> >
> > Running a vessel aground or a collision at sea is uniformly career-ending in the U.S. Navy.
> 
> Fortunately that hasn’t always been true.
> 
> [Chester W. Nimitz - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_W._Nimitz#Early_career)

I don’t disagree with you. In fact, the current practice of zero tolerance for mistakes in the U.S. Navy arguably selects for risk-averse officers who are terrified of doing anything that might jeopardize their careers and promotion prospects. It’s anybody’s guess how well these officers would do in a warfighting situation.

Chester Nimitz is the preeminent example of allowing a junior officer the freedom to make mistakes and learn from them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jnglmassiv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f07891/32.png) [@jnglmassiv](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jnglmassiv)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/57 "2021-11-05T20:06:02Z")

</div>

Now that they know there’s a mountain there, what’s next? Does the Navy send out a survey team to figure oit the size and shape of it (or them). Some other agency? Or do they just mark the maps as a vicinity to avoid like the one the San Francisco hit?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/58 "2021-11-05T20:24:44Z")

</div>

The US Navy does not generally conduct bathymetric surveying. United States Geological Service (USGS) is responsible for underwater surveying of waterways and large bodies of contained water in the Continental US, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) conducts or directs surveys in oceans and coastal regions of interest to US operators. Internationally, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) and the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) coordinate surveying worldwide in the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) project. Even with modern sidescan sonar and satellite geometric measurements, charging the ocean floor and integrating information into accurate charts is an extremely labor intensive activity, and less than 20% of the ocean floor has been mapped in detail to 100 meter or better resolution (which is a good thing because once we find R’lyeh and break the seals so that the Great Cthulhu can rise we’re all fucked.)

[U.S. Bathymetry Coverage and Gap Analysis for Seabead](https://iocm.noaa.gov/seabed-2030-bathymetry.html)

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/59 "2021-11-05T20:33:49Z")

</div>

> [@Dinsdale](#):
>
> So - has anyone given any good idea yet of how deep the water was, how high the seamount, and how deep the sub was traveling?

It is unlikely we’ll be told that. The Navy says Seawolf-class ships have a maximum depth of 800 feet, but [experts suspect it is actually double that.](https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/04/asia/submarine-uss-connecticut-accident-undersea-mountain-hnk-intl-ml-dst/index.html) Reporting the depth in this case would reveal info the Navy prefers to keep secret.

> [@](#):
>
> Also, I would assume S China Sea is a pretty significant body of water for the USN. What degree of accuracy do they have WRT the seabed topography?

Less than 50% of the seafloor in the South China See is mapped, which is still better than the 80% that is unmapped for the oceans overall. The article linked above defines an “accurate map” as having a resolution of 100 meters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dinsdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/97f17d/32.png) [@Dinsdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dinsdale)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2021, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743/60 "2021-11-05T20:56:21Z")

</div>

Thx.

That still gives me a better idea. The thing was 800-1600 feet down - as opposed to some great depth. Relatively shallow water - compared to the deepest seafloor.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-u-s-submarine-struck-an-underwater-mountain-last-month-the-navy-says/953743.md?page=4)
