# Abbott & Costello or Laurel & Hardy

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [February 23, 2016, 11:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869 "2016-02-23T11:16:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urbanredneck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ea5d25/32.png) [@Urbanredneck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Urbanredneck)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 11:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/1 "2016-02-23T11:16:31Z")

</div>

Which one do you think was the funniest?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrFidelius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drfidelius/32/3447_2.png) [@DrFidelius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrFidelius)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 12:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/2 "2016-02-23T12:43:10Z")

</div>

Physical versus verbal comedy is an apples to oranges question. Which I prefer depends on my mood at the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/3 "2016-02-23T14:02:36Z")

</div>

I can’t pick between the two. L&H was usually unsatisfying due to their slooooooow pacing, while A&C could be plain dumb. A&C have the one really good movie to their name – _The Time of Their Lives_ (which probably worked because A&C hated each other at the time). L&H features are just plain tedious.

If forced to choose, I suppose I’d pick L&H, who never were as bad as A&C were at their worst. But I’d group them both as second tier comedians of the era.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/4 "2016-02-23T14:18:53Z")

</div>

> [@RealityChuck](#):
>
> I can’t pick between the two. L&H was usually unsatisfying due to their slooooooow pacing, while A&C could be plain dumb. A&C have the one really good movie to their name – _The Time of Their Lives_ (which probably worked because A&C hated each other at the time). L&H features are just plain tedious.
> 
> If forced to choose, I suppose I’d pick L&H, who never were as bad as A&C were at their worst. But I’d group them both as second tier comedians of the era.

One really good movie? How about _Hold that Ghost_? Or _Naughty Nineties_, with the almost-complete “Who’s on First?” routine. Or _A and C meet Frankenstein_ (less impressive now that I’m an adult, but I loved it as a kid).

I love _Time of their Lives_, but it’s a very atypical A and C film.Abbott loved it because he got to do more physical comedy. (If you liked movies they made while fighting, have you seen _Little Giant_? Worth a look)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/5 "2016-02-23T14:23:23Z")

</div>

I agree with the above posts:

- the two duos had different styles of comedy. It’s a bit like comparing the Marx Brothers with the Three Stooges.

- A&C were uneven. Some of their stuff is brilliant, some has not aged well, and some was stupid at the time. I’m less familiar with L&H’s overall body of work to make the same judgment though.

- I voted A&C because they are a sentimental favorite of mine. The local UHF station when I was a kid would show A&C movies quite often, and for a while also showed their half-hour TV show (in reruns - I’m not \*that \*old!). So I have fond memories of sitting on my couch watching with my dad or my kid brother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/6 "2016-02-23T14:39:06Z")

</div>

I went with about the same. They are different, but equally enjoyable to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/7 "2016-02-23T14:44:18Z")

</div>

> [@Skammer](#):
>
> It’s a bit like comparing the Marx Brothers with the Three Stooges.

[Which we’ve actually done](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=354170), [at least a couple of times](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=611401).

I voted A&C, based on a very limited exposure to both of them. The last time I saw anything by Laurel & Hardy, I, like **RealityChuck** , was frustrated by the slow pacing. I haven’t _seen_ any Abbott & Costello in a long time, but every once in awhile I’ll listen to one of their old radio shows and find it at least mildly funny.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jim\_s\_Son](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19adc/32.png) [@Jim\_s\_Son](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jim_s_Son)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/8 "2016-02-23T15:22:13Z")

</div>

I prefer A & C because of the Tweety Bird cartoon “A Tale of Two Kitties”. Babbitt says “Give me the bird!!” and Catstello mutters “If the Hays office would only let me, I’d give him the bird alright”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/9 "2016-02-23T15:22:53Z")

</div>

Yeah, I voted A&C out of nostalgia, not out of any in depth analysis. For some reason, L&H didn’t get as much air time on the local TV channels when I was growing up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/10 "2016-02-23T15:27:55Z")

</div>

Really a toss-up but I sided with A&C mostly because I saw their things at the movies, while L&H came later on TV. Without that to sway me, I would rank them almost the same. Both were funnier than Martin & Lewis, if that matters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/11 "2016-02-23T15:48:07Z")

</div>

Narrow vote for L&H, though neither team’s work has aged particularly well. Give me W.C. Fields over them any day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terminus\_Est](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terminus_est/32/3087_2.png) [@Terminus\_Est](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terminus_Est)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/12 "2016-02-23T15:55:16Z")

</div>

Abbott and Costello have the immortal _Who’s on First?_ routine, so that makes them winners in my book.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![commasense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/commasense/32/3017_2.png) [@commasense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/commasense)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/13 "2016-02-23T17:26:08Z")

</div>

Abbott and Costello never won an [Oscar.](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023251/?ref_=fn_al_tt_4) Case closed.

Also, although this is no reflection on the quality of their work, Costello was by all accounts a very unpleasant man, and he and Abbott were not friends offstage. A stark contrast to Stan and Ollie, who were gentlemen in their private lives and unfailingly pleasant to their fans, and remained great friends till Ollie’s death.

Also, I think there can be no dispute that Laurel and Hardy, whose active career spanned three decades and scores of shorts (although only about half as many features as A&C), were vastly more popular worldwide than Abbott and Costello. This could in part be because A&C’s verbal humor, typified by Who’s on First (which I grant is one of the classic comedy routines), didn’t translate as well overseas as L&H’s more physical comedy.

But that doesn’t explain all of the difference. Stan and Ollie’s characters had greater depth and humanity, IMHO, and therefore more universal appeal. Although I’m more familiar with L&H’s work than A&C’s, I also believe the former were far more innovative and creative in their comedy than the latter.

I agreee with some here who say that Laurel and Hardy’s features drag a little for today’s viewers. The shorts are definitely their best work. Watch The Music Box, Big Business, or Brats (where they play themselves and their own kids in oversized sets).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![terentii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terentii/32/212_2.png) [@terentii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/terentii)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/14 "2016-02-23T18:27:25Z")

</div>

There’s nothing wrong with Laurel and Hardy’s pacing. I’d much rather watch their shorts, where the jokes were allowed to build slowly, than any of the piss-poor sitcoms nowadays that try to ram as many lame “jokes” down the viewers’ throats as their allotted 18 to 22 minutes permit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![terentii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terentii/32/212_2.png) [@terentii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/terentii)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/15 "2016-02-23T18:28:53Z")

</div>

IMHO, L&H were funni_er_ than A&C.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirRay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@SirRay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SirRay)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/16 "2016-02-23T18:33:33Z")

</div>

Well, Abbot & Costello started making films together in 1940, by which time Laurel & Hardy had been making films (shorts & features) for over 13 years. According to their relative filmographies, A&C didn’t really make any shorts, only features, while Laurel & Hardy dozens of shorts (in late 1920s thru mid- 1930s Los Angeles, an era which LA looks really cool IMO), as well as features (of somewhat uneven quality).  
Decades later, upon viewing the L&H shorts on YouTube etc, yes L&H were often funnier than A&C in comparable scenarios.

A&C were on in the NY Tri-state area on (I believe) WPIX, Sunday morning, and as a little kid in the 1970s I watched them somewhat religiously (they were on after that drab stop-motion David & Goliath show, which I did NOT watch religiously, on the last few minutes waiting for the song “Hot Butter” to come on, signaling the start of the A&C feature). Their TV show reruns, eh, I didn’t watch too much as lots of the show was clips from the movies I already knew by heart. Laurel & Hardy were much harder to find on NY television in the 1970s (as stated above).

In the obligatory World War II “raw recruits” in boot-camp/win-the-military-wargame-exercise movie, A&C’s “Buck Privates” definitely outshines L&H’s “Great Guns” IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anamorphic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/anamorphic/32/3057_2.png) [@Anamorphic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anamorphic)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/17 "2016-02-23T18:38:33Z")

</div>

> [@commasense](#):
>
> Abbott and Costello never won an [Oscar.](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023251/?ref_=fn_al_tt_4) Case closed.

The stairs where they filmed The Music Box is just up the street from me! I walk by it almost every day. And, when so motivated, up it.

When I was much younger, I enjoyed Abbott & Costello more, but as I’ve gotten older, I’ve found I like the comedy and pacing of Laurel & Hardy more. That’s not a comment on the maturity level of the comedy or anything; just a change of taste. I do still like Abbott & Costello as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/18 "2016-02-23T18:42:22Z")

</div>

I never could get into Laurel & Hardy as a team, though I did like some of Stan Laurel’s solo work from the silent era. This one goes to Abbot and Costello, even though I was never more than middling fond of their work, either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/19 "2016-02-23T18:44:00Z")

</div>

Depends on my mood so I went with about the same.

Their comedy styles are so very different from each other that I wouldn’t normally compare them. A&C were very loud and brash. L&H tended to be a bit more gentle and sublte, up to the point where everything falls apart and then, yeah they could be pretty loud and destructive too. But A&C were pretty much going to town and tearing the place up from the start.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869/20 "2016-02-23T20:12:49Z")

</div>

No question for me. Abbot and that other guy are simply _annoying._

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abbott-costello-or-laurel-hardy/746869.md?page=2)
