# Aborting gay fetuses

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aborting-gay-fetuses/486662>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 20, 2009, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aborting-gay-fetuses/486662 "2009-02-20T02:21:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 50

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2009, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aborting-gay-fetuses/486662/50 "2009-02-20T16:34:22Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Well, that’s very generous of you, but the question was whether pro-lifers would support allowing the baby to be adopted BY gay people.

That would be a decision between the bio-parents (or guardian) and the couple. In general terms I believe that both genders are needed and one can never substitute for another as they contribute different attributes to a child so a m-f couple would be in general preferable.

Just going on a line of thought, a f-f couple might be the next in order of preference as one female may take on the full maternal role, which IMHO is critically important in early life. A single f may not have the time required to nurture a baby, though there is a greater possibility of the addition of a male in marriage for the father role later in life. A m-m couple would be the least preferable IMHO (of the 4 possibilities mentioned), as the father role, though very important for normal development, is not as critical as the maternal one at the early stages IMHO.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aborting-gay-fetuses/486662)._
