You could throw ‘check your links’ in there, too. Thanks.
It’s not that they think the doctor could be wrong–it’s that they think the fetus’s right to life is absolutely commeasurate with the mother’s, and that it is never ethically right to sacrifice one life to save another. So, in the same way that they don’t believe you could kill one person to harvest their organs to give another a life-saving transplant, they think that it’s wrong to kill the fetus so that the mother may live, even if doing nothing will result in the death of both.
By doing nothing, they believe themselves to be not culpable in the death of the mother, which is caused by the fetus. If they were to abort, they would be culpable in the death of the fetus, with no corresponding credit for saving the mother.
Note: This is not a view that I endorse; I’m simply explaining the reasoning behind it.
Which realistically is the same thing. Outlawing abortion goes hand in hand with misogyny.
Then you aren’t really “anti-abortion” as the term is normally used; and certainly not in the context of this thread which is about outlawing abortion. I’M “anti-abortion” by the standard you are using, and so is almost all of the population I think; abortion is clearly second best to effective birth control by a large margin. “Anti-abortion” normally means “wants to outlaw abortion”.