Abraham Lincoln. Who did he think he was?

Ummm… Did they even have ice cream back then? I mean, how’d they keep it frozen? Would an ice box be cold enough? Maybe they only ate it in winter. Or maybe it was just a sort of chilled, sweetened flavored cream. So many questions…

Actually, it wasn’t a laxative. He apparently took it to treat depression. It contained, among other things, dangerously high levels of mercury. Lincoln was know for occasional bizarre and violent behaviour, which can be a symptom of mercury poisoning. Several months after his inauguration he decided that the pills were making him cross and stopped taking them. After that he showed the calm and composure that he is noted for. Check out this link: http://www.cosmiverse.com/science07180102.html

It seems that they did.

I don’t know what they did to keep it frozen.

I don’t like cake… I don’t have time to tell you why I hate cake but Suffice it to say that not liking cake is a very important issue you should all discuss. So begin your debate any time on the fact I don’t think Cake is all that shit hot. No I’m sorry I can’t say anything please just discuss.
What? You ask why I’ve spent all this time telling you I don’t cake when all I have to do is just put a few words down expaining my cake hating post. Well that is a good question but I don’t have the time to answer because I don’t like cake not at all

Ok I’m still here but well I’m just waiting to see what you think of cake and why cake would never be a good president. By the way I don’t like apple pie either… sorry no time to explain.

Please discuss… Oh yes this will be a great debate all right I wish I could get into it but I have no time. Just remember I hate cake. By the way Cake never freed the slaves. Oh do I loathe cake… Let them eat cake but remember a cake in the hand isn’t worth two birds in the bush.

You aren’t discussing. Sorry no time to get further into this.
Hmmmm Why are you not discussing this…
oh yeah. I HAVEN’T GIVEN ANY REAL FREAKING ARGUMENT TO DISCUSS!!! NO ARGUMENT AT ALL

To attempt to seriously answer your question, Lincoln wouldn’t have seen it that way. He believed, almost religiously, that the preservation of the United States, as one nation, was neccesary for democracy. That was one (but not the only one) of the reasons he was opposed to slavery. If you read his first inaugural, he lays out his thinking about the matter of the union there.

Are you sure it was margarine? I thought it was Mayonaise, invented by General MacMahon (a French general of Irish descent).

It looks like oleomargarine was first manufactured in the US in 1871. Apparently it was first invented in France in 1869, by Hippolyte Mège-Mouries, a French chemist, by mixing beef fat with milk and salt. At the 1866 Paris World Fair, Emperor Napoleon III had announced that he was subsidizing research toward a butter substitute, and this was the result.

And then you quote:

See, this is what I find absurd. Unity of the USA as a federation is a distinct issue from democratic governance of any of its member states.
But the mid-1800’s Republican Party held to the position that the USA was a single nation, & that the South had no right to independence. And here we see Lincoln trying rhetorically to tie this to belief in democracy.
The Southerners, obviously, disagreed. They maintained, rightly, that they had as much right to secede from the Union as the united states had to win independence from the United Kingdom three generations earlier.

One could reasonably claim that in that case, it was better to keep a unified nation to ensure democracy in the South & to end slavery. But, in general, it is absurd to equate the sovereignty of large federal organizations with democracy, liberty, or good governance in the many local areas where people actually live.

Well, maybe there is a connection there. Keeping the borders open may allow people to leave corrupt &/or oppressive localities for more liberal areas and put a beneficial economic & political pressure on the corrupt areas to reform.
However, as the liberals & the oppressed minorities abandon those areas, they leave nearly monolithic populations who scoff at any attempts to reform them.

Sure, just like the Union had a right to fight to prevent them from doing so, like the UK did three generations earlier.

But to get back on topic, when it comes to cake, you really can’t beat a Baskin Robins ice cream cake with that chocolate crumb stuff! Mmm!

I think you have it wrong. John Wilkes Booth ate too much cake, and the sugar made him go crazy. The historical predecent for Harvey Milk (as in ice milk) and the Twinkie defense.

Actually, if I had stopped to think about it for a moment I would have realized that it was possible that they had ice cream back them. I remember that my grandparents had a hand-cranked ice cream machine. We used to use it to make ice cream on the spot for picnics. The ingredrients were placed in an enclosed drum which was immersed in an ice and salt mixture. So if you have ice you can make ice cream even if you don’t have refrigeration. Before refrigeration, ice was harvested from lakes and, I believe, stored in insulated warehouses for the summer.
They may have had to consume it as soon as they made it, but it was possible to make it.

Stop making me laugh! I’ll wake the parents up. And we all know that means no Cake :smiley:

Jeez you people, I come here looking for a debate on the relative merits of certain deserts, only to find this thread hijacked by a discussion on abe lincoln, slavery, and the civil war. And you wonder why I’m in a bad mood. Bah.:frowning: