# Abusing E=Mc2

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 23, 2013, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059 "2013-01-23T00:09:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/1 "2013-01-23T00:09:18Z")

</div>

Ok, so I don’t know how to do superscript in a title.

But you physics people know the reference. So here’s me question: Using that…formula, is it correct to say M = E/c[sup]2[/sup]?

What I want to do is make something incredibly heavy, like, really _really_ heavy, and stationary. Can I do that by releasing massive amounts of energy into a confined space? Like, if I had the means to contain the energy, could I somehow harness a matter/antimatter annihilation and convert the resulting energy into mass?

Because, you know…just asking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/2 "2013-01-23T00:12:54Z")

</div>

That’d explain black holes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8c91f0/32.png) [@Flander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flander)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/3 "2013-01-23T00:13:20Z")

</div>

You are misunderstanding the equation. You can’t turn energy into matter or matter into energy; just that certain numerical values are equivilent given the relationship in the equation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndrewL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@AndrewL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AndrewL)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/4 "2013-01-23T00:14:33Z")

</div>

If you harnessed a matter/antimatter reaction and somehow turned the energy back into mass, the resulting mass would be the same as the mass of the matter and antimatter you reacted in the first place. So, no net increase in mass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/5 "2013-01-23T01:12:14Z")

</div>

> [@Flander](#):
>
> You are misunderstanding the equation. You can’t turn energy into matter or matter into energy; just that certain numerical values are equivilent given the relationship in the equation.

:dubious:

He does not understand the equation. He may misunderstand the application. But I’m pretty sure you do, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 1:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/6 "2013-01-23T01:47:32Z")

</div>

Actually, the OP has it right: If you have a really whopping huge amount of energy, and you somehow manage to contain it in a stationary container, the container will contain a mass equal to E/c^2. Just don’t ask how you’re managing to contain the energy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8c91f0/32.png) [@Flander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flander)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/7 "2013-01-23T02:00:34Z")

</div>

> [@smiling\_bandit](#):
>
> :dubious:
> 
> He does not understand the equation. He may misunderstand the application. But I’m pretty sure you do, too.

My thinking was along the lines of Star Trek holographic machines that take some amount of energy and create some equivilent form of matter. I suppose in the spirit of the OP, one could take one of these and tweek the Power knob to HI, the volume knob to LOW, and get an extremely dense object strictly from energy. However, I don’t know if we have that yet. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/8 "2013-01-23T02:38:51Z")

</div>

I think the gist of it is matter and energy are the same, so there is no abuse, no hard feelings no next day regrets when you wake up after a night of drinking next to the other knowing you did exchange matter for energy.

it’s all good

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zakalwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zakalwe/32/270_2.png) [@Zakalwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zakalwe)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/9 "2013-01-23T02:50:02Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> I think the gist of it is matter and energy are the same, so there is no abuse, no hard feelings no next day regrets when you wake up after a night of drinking next to the other knowing you did exchange matter for energy.
> 
> it’s all good

Well, matter does still have to sneak home in the same clothes it wore yesterday. Fortunately, it gets to sneak home at the speed of light squared so the chances of getting caught are slim…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/10 "2013-01-23T02:54:10Z")

</div>

> [@Zakalwe](#):
>
> Well, matter does still have to sneak home in the same clothes it wore yesterday. Fortunately, it gets to sneak home at the speed of light squared so the chances of getting caught are slim…

Nothing moves faster then matter sneaking home after a night with energy, I think that is why tachyons come about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/11 "2013-01-23T03:01:53Z")

</div>

> [@Inigo\_Montoya](#):
>
> What I want to do is make something incredibly heavy, like, really _really_ heavy, and stationary. Can I do that by releasing massive amounts of energy into a confined space? Like, if I had the means to contain the energy, could I somehow harness a matter/antimatter annihilation and convert the resulting energy into mass?

> [@Ethilrist](#):
>
> That’d explain black holes.

[Kugelblitz](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_%28astrophysics%29); a black hole made of light.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 3:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/12 "2013-01-23T03:04:40Z")

</div>

Well, made _from_ light, at least. It’s a semantic game whether you consider a black hole to be made _of_ anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/13 "2013-01-23T03:28:38Z")

</div>

> [@AndrewL](#):
>
> If you harnessed a matter/antimatter reaction and somehow turned the energy back into mass, the resulting mass would be the same as the mass of the matter and antimatter you reacted in the first place. So, no net increase in mass.

Not only that, but the matter would likely be in the form of particles and their anti-particles since we’re pretty sure mass is conserved and baryon and lepton numbers are “mostly” conserved. In this case if you contained them, they’d generally annihilate and convert back to energy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/14 "2013-01-23T04:27:24Z")

</div>

Ok, I’ve stopped laughing. You guys are fun.

Here’s where I’m going with this, maybe y’all can help. You know that [iconic image](http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=en&tbo=d&biw=1463&bih=689&tbm=isch&tbnid=-oTnREWqYOg5gM:&imgrefurl=http://www.landscheidt.info/%3Fq%3Dnode/200&docid=t_-6QXyN0-ij2M&imgurl=http://www.landscheidt.info/images/well.jpg&w=400&h=300&ei=5mX_UL7WJs_vqQGU1YHQCQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=1001&vpy=123&dur=697&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=171&ty=132&sig=108337893173565708182&page=1&tbnh=138&tbnw=181&start=0&ndsp=28&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:0,i:100) of gravity that makes things look like balls sitting on the down comforter that calls to me even now? Well what if Space/time is folded up like the sheets in the closet?

So instead of a ball making a huge dent in the blanket it sits on, what if we made something really, really heavy but still relatively small? So rather than just “denting” space/time, it actually pokes a hole in it and we end up on another layer of the sheet? I’m trying really hard to do this with E=Mc[sup]2[/sup], but so far all I’m doing is messing up the garage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/15 "2013-01-23T05:58:20Z")

</div>

As to OP, there’s confined energy all over the place. When I lie in a suntanning sarcophagus, I’m supporting a slightly heavier mass than before, am I not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Punoqllads](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d2c977/32.png) [@Punoqllads](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Punoqllads)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 6:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/16 "2013-01-23T06:26:37Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> [Kugelblitz](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_%28astrophysics%29); a black hole made of light.

Not to be confused with a kugelblintz, the densest cuisine short of a knish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmyk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmyk/32/3353_2.png) [@cmyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmyk)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 11:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/17 "2013-01-23T11:30:46Z")

</div>

> [@Inigo\_Montoya](#):
>
> Ok, I’ve stopped laughing. You guys are fun.
> 
> Here’s where I’m going with this, maybe y’all can help. You know that [iconic image](http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=en&tbo=d&biw=1463&bih=689&tbm=isch&tbnid=-oTnREWqYOg5gM:&imgrefurl=http://www.landscheidt.info/%3Fq%3Dnode/200&docid=t_-6QXyN0-ij2M&imgurl=http://www.landscheidt.info/images/well.jpg&w=400&h=300&ei=5mX_UL7WJs_vqQGU1YHQCQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=1001&vpy=123&dur=697&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=171&ty=132&sig=108337893173565708182&page=1&tbnh=138&tbnw=181&start=0&ndsp=28&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:0,i:100) of gravity that makes things look like balls sitting on the down comforter that calls to me even now? Well what if Space/time is folded up like the sheets in the closet?
> 
> So instead of a ball making a huge dent in the blanket it sits on, what if we made something really, really heavy but still relatively small? So rather than just “denting” space/time, it actually pokes a hole in it and we end up on another layer of the sheet? I’m trying really hard to do this with E=Mc[sup]2[/sup], but so far all I’m doing is messing up the garage.

Well, there’s yer problem — you went and brought gravity all up into it!

We know matter and energy are equivalent. We have a lot of this worked out in QM and GR, but once you go poking gravitational holes, from energy or matter into spacetime itself, you should be thankful only your garage is getting messy. Many have lost an eye trying to crack that one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmyk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmyk/32/3353_2.png) [@cmyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmyk)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/18 "2013-01-23T12:06:33Z")

</div>

Also, the “sheet” analogy for the curvature gravity has on spacetime doesn’t quite give the full feeling of the geodesics (the shortest path from point to point in curved geometry) involved in its warpage.

[Here’s a better indication.](http://www.world-mysteries.com/newgw/gravity5.jpg)

So, there wouldn’t necessarily be more “sheets” below the gravity-well if you poked through, like with a singularity at the center of a black hole.

I have some favorite hypothesis that attempt to flesh out what’s really going on beyond that threshold (strains of “complex spacetime”), but that’s a whole 'nuther ball of string.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/19 "2013-01-23T12:39:01Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Actually, the OP has it right: If you have a really whopping huge amount of energy, and you somehow manage to contain it in a stationary container, the container will contain a mass equal to E/c^2.

This is why batteries are so heavy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmyk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmyk/32/3353_2.png) [@cmyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmyk)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059/20 "2013-01-23T13:27:58Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> This is why batteries are so heavy.

And really hot helium balloons.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/abusing-e-mc2/648059.md?page=2)
