Accepted For Value (A4V)

Thanks for the confirmation. Now all I have to do is write up a contract with myself whereby I (;usedtobe: a flesh and blood sentient sovRan CitizEn) agree to represent USEDTOBE:, a legal fiction holding $100,000,000,000 in a secret account in the Federal Reserve - all matters. Furthermore, USEDTOBE acknowledges that he is the sole debtor and I, :usedtobe: a flesh and blood sentient sovRan CitizEn am the creditor and entitled to all proceeds from said account.

I really want to see the document with 4 colors of ink AND a red thumb print Mr. Meads “filed” in Meads v Meads. I also REALLY want to see the final judgement.
After 20 pages or so of “Let’s see how many ways we can nail these morons”, I suspect the good Judge has some unpleasant surprises waiting. We may not know until after August - Mr. Meads has not filed tax returns for the last couple of years, and the Judge gave him until Aug to produce tax returns, statements of investments, quantities of precious metals and stones (this guy is not poor, just believes there are magic words which will make all his debts and taxes go away.

As to the OP - the judgement refers repeatly to a "Mercedes Benz Financing v (some A4V moron). It seems someone thought he could score a really nice car for free The case was referenced in several places:
Example of OPCA strategy
How Costs and be used to discourage such nonsense
How Contempt actions can be applied.
It seems that fellow really should have rented the car - his attempt to get it free is going to cost much more than the rental fees would have been.

Another Q for those gurus who use seminars: How did you pay for the room? I’ll give you real good odds he did NOT write “A4V” (or “Bill - consumer purchases”) and hand it back.
Follow him to his car - does HE have “license plates” issued by himself?

I actually watched a minute or two of some snake oil guy - he starts with "I’m just a carpenter - i’m not a lawyer! If you want legal advice, see a lawyer. I’m not an accountant…

He probably thinks that disclaimer will protected him from litigation - it might have, had he not them launched into an explanation of how the law really works.
I really wanted to watch him explain where this “hidden fortune” came from. They actually believe that, at birth, a fantastic (literal meaning) sum is deposited in your account and that your SS (USA) SI (Canada) number is all or part of the account number. If you chant just the right words, the Clerk (or Judge) can be forced to open that account and pay all your bills.
Mr. Meads actually handed the Clerk a “contract” which made her his fiduciary and instructed her to use his secret account to pay any assessment the Court might place on him. Bizarre enough.
To top it off:He later explains to the Judge that he HAS provided payment - he has given the Clerk everything she needs to pay - why is the Judge thinking he still owes anything?
To top off the top off: He requests a small advance on this account in the sum of $100,000,000,000 (yes, 100 billion), paid in gold or silver.

p.s. - it was flavor-aid. real Kool-Aid was too expensive. Given the one-time nature of the event, they could have splurged…

Looks like we have: Vibert v AG [2013] JRC 030 (7 February 2013). Vibert is a decision from the Jersey Royal Court in the UK.

At paragraph 42, the decision discusses Meads:

(Emphasis as in original.) The decision then goes on to refer to paragraphs in Meads, and compares them to the court behaviour exhibited and documentation filed by Mr. Vibert.

Yup, Rook has written the sovereign citizen bible. :slight_smile: