# According to this stupid color acuity test on FB...

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 27, 2012, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421 "2012-06-27T03:17:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 3:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/81 "2012-06-28T03:57:56Z")

</div>

45, just a little better than average based on the scale at the bottom of the page.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hilarity\_N.Suze](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hilarity_n.suze/32/6223_2.png) [@Hilarity\_N.Suze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hilarity_N.Suze)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 5:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/82 "2012-06-28T05:30:52Z")

</div>

Eek, I did this some time ago and got a 0, and just now I got a 22.

Of course, my monitor is much older now.

But so are my eyes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9bcb4/32.png) [@ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 5:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/83 "2012-06-28T05:47:48Z")

</div>

0 for me. My better half is one of those rarer color-blind women-folk, though. And she’s left-handed. And a lesbian. Sadly, she has crappy luck gambling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/7bcc69/32.png) [@AaronX](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AaronX)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 9:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/84 "2012-06-28T09:02:11Z")

</div>

> [@MacCat](#):
>
> I got a 0 on the same machine, but color is a big part of my aptitude, education & profession…

2009 MacBook Pro? Do you use it in your work? The screen’s colour reproduction doesn’t seem that good to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jerseymule](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jerseymule/32/3155_2.png) [@jerseymule](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jerseymule)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 3:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/85 "2012-06-28T15:53:53Z")

</div>

Your score: 8  
Gender: Female  
Age range: 50-59

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/renee/32/287_2.png) [@Renee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Renee)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/86 "2012-06-28T17:31:51Z")

</div>

> [@astro](#):
>
> Also bear in mind that some monitors (especially low priced or older flat panels LCDs) are not that great at showing subtle color gradations so it may not be all you if you are looking at what appears to be a smooth gradation and the test is beating you down.

I just got a 0 on the cheapest LCD screen you could buy six years ago. 😃 But I’m a painter, I should be good at this stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baal\_Houtham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baal_houtham/32/13604_2.png) [@Baal\_Houtham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baal_Houtham)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 6:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/87 "2012-06-28T18:31:21Z")

</div>

> [@Colophon](#):
>
> This time, I scored 4, with the errors being in the turquoise zone. I blame my monitor. 😃

Same as above, using an Apple IPS monitor. Because I deal with color in my job I viewed it as a challenge to do well, and probably spent 12 minutes moving many of the chips back and forth with their neighbors… but eventually got bored and said _enough_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2012, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/88 "2012-06-28T23:01:32Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> and in brighter light (normal daylight illumination, or indoors with the lights on) peripheral vision is subserved by the handful of blue-sensitive cones that are out on the periphery.

Huh–that I did not know. I knew that dark-adapted rods could saturate easily (which is why dark adaptation is so easily lost), but didn’t know that there was another saturation point well before normal bright conditions.

> [@njtt](#):
>
> I would doubt that brightness is an issue either. If this teat has been constructed properly, the patches should have been equalized for brightness.

In principle, yes–but that’s the kind of thing that an uncalibrated monitor could easily throw off. Somewhat ironically, calibration could make this test more difficult.

> [@njtt](#):
>
> Surprising as it may seem, there is evidence from recent experiments that eye movements do play a role in color vision. With this test, I found that after I had got things in fairly good order, it helped to move my eyes back and forth along the color line, looking for uneven transitions. I found a few that I had not noticed when looking just at two or three adjacent patches at a time.

Not too surprising to me but interesting nevertheless. The random distribution of receptors helps with detail as well–intuitively, you would expect the detail limit of the eye to be on the order of the receptor spacing, but in fact it’s much higher than that for certain cases (vernier acuity is the quintessential example–the ability to line up two offset lines). I’m not sure that the reason is known for certain, but it’s a pretty good guess that the eye uses the stochastic distribution to make extra inferences about the position of the lines. You couldn’t really do this if the receptors were in a perfect grid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pai325](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Pai325](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pai325)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/89 "2012-06-29T01:42:14Z")

</div>

Female. 131

i know I have issues with color, and I guess this proves it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MacCat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/maccat/32/216_2.png) [@MacCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MacCat)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/90 "2012-06-29T18:22:02Z")

</div>

> [@AaronX](#):
>
> 2009 MacBook Pro?

Actually, older. Think I got it in '08

Model Identifier: MacBookPro3,1

> [@](#):
>
> Do you use it in your work?

Yes, Landscape Design. Color is not critical like in high end magazine advertising or similar, but I do fine with approximating colors of actual flowers, and other elements. The Epson printer I use is pretty good too, so overall the print I present to the client looks very good.

> [@AaronX](#):
>
> The screen’s colour reproduction doesn’t seem that good to me.

Mine seems fine for my purposes, but _precise_ color is not critical for my work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cher3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/da6949/32.png) [@cher3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cher3)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/91 "2012-06-29T19:06:22Z")

</div>

Am I doing it right? What’s with the extra chip below each of the rows?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Death\_of\_Rats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a6a055/32.png) [@Death\_of\_Rats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Death_of_Rats)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/92 "2012-06-29T19:16:32Z")

</div>

I tried it without moving any and got a score of 936! now everone can feel a little better about thier score. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![drewtwo99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d07c76/32.png) [@drewtwo99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drewtwo99)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/93 "2012-06-29T19:49:25Z")

</div>

I got a 7, which I thought was good until I saw most people here got like a 4 or a 0.

So I’m just gonna say I didn’t try very hard, I’m tired from working in the office all day, the computer monitor is cheap, and you guys are probably pulling our legs anyway.

I had troubles with the turqouis here too, and knew I was having trouble with it during the test. It didn’t surprise me that the results showed that was my weak area.

ETA: Highest score for my gender and age range is 109748. Wow…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zabali\_Clawbane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ecd19e/32.png) [@Zabali\_Clawbane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zabali_Clawbane)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/94 "2012-06-29T20:08:28Z")

</div>

> [@drewtwo99](#):
>
> I got a 7, which I thought was good until I saw most people here got like a 4 or a 0.
> 
> So I’m just gonna say I didn’t try very hard, I’m tired from working in the office all day, the computer monitor is cheap, and you guys are probably pulling our legs anyway.
> 
> I had troubles with the turqouis here too, and knew I was having trouble with it during the test. It didn’t surprise me that the results showed that was my weak area.
> 
> ETA: Highest score for my gender and age range is 109748. Wow…

Here’s **[the screenshot](http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu78/Zabigail/KatPerfectColorVisionvsm.jpg)** I got last time I took the test.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Finagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b19c9b/32.png) [@Finagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Finagle)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/95 "2012-06-29T20:23:46Z")

</div>

Got a 4, but my eyes were starting to freak out on me after a couple of minutes, so I didn’t spend much time checking my work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/96 "2012-06-29T20:27:20Z")

</div>

> [@Kenm](#):
>
> Is it worth the time to do the test when probably every monitor used in this thread has different colour characteristics?

Precisely the problem. I know the way my monitor is set up that certain hues are mixed up–I can go compare it on another monitor.

Though LCDs are much more accurate that CRTs were. It’s probably not going to be off by more than 100 or so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/97 "2012-06-29T20:35:44Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> The test is about \*relative \*colors, and has little to do with calibration. You could do the test on 100 monitors, all calibrated differently, and the results should be the same . . . except for some really crappy monitors, or displays with only 256 colors.

That’s full out wrong. I know for certain there are times where a bright yellow will, when, made brighter, take on a green tint, and then, a bit brighter still, will lose it. I also know it looks perfectly fine on the LCD monitor that is more correctly calibrated.

Furthermore, if one color is brighter than another, then rather than seeming like continuous color, it will seem like it gets brighter all the sudden, and thus look wrong. You can only do this measurement if the brightness is either the same or contiguous, otherwise the color differences are too small.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2012, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/98 "2012-06-29T20:55:25Z")

</div>

> [@cher3](#):
>
> Am I doing it right? What’s with the extra chip below each of the rows?

From what I can tell, this thing only works properly if the full screen and text magnification is at 100%. Seeing as that won’t fit on my monitor, I can’t do this test.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VenusGx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/e495f1/32.png) [@VenusGx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VenusGx)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2017, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/99 "2017-05-16T05:17:33Z")

</div>

Well I know this is bragging a bit, but I took 2 different versions of this test on 3 different monitors and scored a 0 each time. 😃 Now if only I could figure out a way to capitalize on my newly discovered talent for having perfect color acuity! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drunky\_Smurf](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drunky_smurf/32/449_2.png) [@Drunky\_Smurf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drunky_Smurf)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2017, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421/100 "2017-05-16T15:29:09Z")

</div>

I took the test for real this time and got a 4.

Thanks for bumping this **VenusGx** so I could prove my awesomeness.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/according-to-this-stupid-color-acuity-test-on-fb/626421.md?page=6)
