# ACORN "pimp" arrested for illegally accessing Senate office; tampering with phone system

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 26, 2010, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586 "2010-01-26T23:13:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2010, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/301 "2010-06-03T21:24:40Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> From your link:
> 
> First – if he told them he planned to use prostitution proceeds to run for Congress, that proves my point reasonably well.

No it doesn’t, because that is not a request for any help or service from ACORN. It also confirms that he never claimed to be a pimp.

> [@](#):
>
> Here we have him telling the ACORN workers that he intended to run for Congress through earnings from prostitution, and they continued to help him.

They helped him run for Congress? Cite?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2010, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/302 "2010-06-03T21:31:30Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Well, I did find a pdf of a report by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger
> 
> (bolding mine)
> 
> Full disclosure: The report is an "independent report by a reputable individual, however it was not an official government investigation; it was commissioned by the ACORN board.

Thanks for this. This must have been what I was thinking of. If it was an independent investigation and not from an official one, then I guess **Bricker** will say it’s therefore a lie and the former Mass. AG is in on ACORN’s nefarious conspiracy to shine on fake pimps as they talk about their plans to run for Congress.

Still, the _official_ findings still remain that ACORN was cleared by every law enforcement in investigation in every state concerned. I’d like to know what **Bricker** thinks ACORN was actually guilty of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2010, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/303 "2010-06-03T21:41:25Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Thanks for this. This must have been what I was thinking of. If it was an independent investigation and not from an official one, then I guess **Bricker** will say it’s therefore a lie and the former Mass. AG is in on ACORN’s nefarious conspiracy to shine on fake pimps as they talk about their plans to run for Congress.

Many third party sites were reporting this investigation as by the Attorney General of Mass. (they left out “former”) so it is understandable if you gathered that it was a government report.

I’m comfortable believing that Harshbarger would not simply make shit up about “insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms.Giles’s comments”

This goes beyond simple film making, into the genre of:

Lying, dirtbag vicious cowardly propagandizing, for the purposes of destroying the credibility of an organization who is doing nothing illegal, but is registering voters who may tend to vote for a political party you do not like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2010, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/304 "2010-06-03T22:07:36Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Thanks for this. This must have been what I was thinking of. If it was an independent investigation and not from an official one, then I guess **Bricker** will say it’s therefore a lie and the former Mass. AG is in on ACORN’s nefarious conspiracy to shine on fake pimps as they talk about their plans to run for Congress.

Y’know, in my experience, if a poster explicitly withdraws an erroneous assertion, then restates essentially the same thing without the error, **Bricker** tends to be quite generous about acknowledging it, and dealing with the assertion as amended.

OTOH, when a poster pisses and moans about how he ( **Bricker** ) would call them a liar because of a nitpicky little error (yet neglects to acknowledge and correct the errror itself), yeah, he can be pretty enthusiastic in his insistence that the poster still has an unacknowledged inaccuracy in his resume.

I’m just sayin’…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2010, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/305 "2010-06-03T22:16:59Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I find it very likely that the ACORN people featured on his tapes did substantially what he portrays them as having done.
> 
> I find it very likely that the ACORN people featured on his tapes did exactly what he portrays them as having done.
> 
> I find it very likely that the ACORN people featured on his tapes did substantially what he portrays them as having done.
> 
> I find it very likely that the ACORN people featured on his tapes did substantially what he portrays them as having done.
> 
> I find it very likely that the ACORN people featured on his tapes did substantially what he portrays them as having done.
> 
> One of these things is not like the others,  
> One of these things just doesn’t belong,  
> Can you tell which thing is not like the others  
> By the time I finish my song?

So what you are saying so far are virtually empty assertions just to keep your “point” going?

Do tell.

It is clear that you do not want to consider that one of the ACORN workers did plant information that demonstrated how unreliable the “pimp” was.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/306 "2010-06-04T00:16:21Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Well, I did find a pdf of a report by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger
> 
> (bolding mine)
> 
> Full disclosure: The report is an "independent report by a reputable individual, however it was not an official government investigation; it was commissioned by the ACORN board.

I’d sure like this link.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosstone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/22d042/32.png) [@Bosstone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosstone)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/307 "2010-06-04T00:24:12Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I’d sure like this link.

[Skadoosh](http://www.proskauer.com/files/uploads/report2.pdf). (Link to PDF)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/308 "2010-06-04T00:24:56Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> No it doesn’t, because that is not a request for any help or service from ACORN. It also confirms that he never claimed to be a pimp.

He was going to use the proceeds from the prostitution but he wasn’t a pimp?

What am I missing?

> [@](#):
>
> They helped him run for Congress? Cite?

No. “They helped him” refers to his original request for assistance from ACORN.

Not his run for Congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lightnin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lightnin/32/180_2.png) [@Lightnin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lightnin)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/309 "2010-06-04T00:41:29Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> No. “They helped him” refers to his original request for assistance from ACORN.
> 
> Not his run for Congress.

Surely there exists some corroborating paperwork? I mean, if they were going to assist him in any way, there would have to be a papertrail, correct?

Or are we talking just emotional assistance?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/310 "2010-06-04T00:44:50Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> No. “They helped him” refers to his original request for assistance from ACORN.
> 
> Not his run for Congress.

And exactly what assistance did this ACORN office give him? Sympathetic noises? Precisely what paperwork did they file on his behalf?

What about the other ACORN offices where the staff turned him away, reported him to the police, refused to provide him any aid, and in one case tried to convince the phony prostitute to get counseling?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/311 "2010-06-04T00:49:53Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Well, I did find a pdf of a report by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger
> 
> (bolding mine)
> 
> Full disclosure: The report is an "independent report by a reputable individual, however it was not an official government investigation; it was commissioned by the ACORN board.

I have no problem with the credibility of a report from Harshbarger. In fact, given that it was made in an effort to improve ACORN’s processes, as opposed to determining if any ACORN conduct was prosecutable, it arguably reaches a higher standard of criticism. I don’t imagine a former state AG is going to throw his integrity under the bus for ACORN, either.

So I am willing to take whatever facts he reports at face value.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/312 "2010-06-04T00:57:24Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> And exactly what assistance did this ACORN office give him? Sympathetic noises? Precisely what paperwork did they file on his behalf?

So far as I’m aware, no one actually filed paperwork on his behalf; the jig was exposed before that point was reached. The problem that he exposed was that in some ACORN offices, he could go in and talk about setting up a prostitution scheme and NOT get immediately told, “We can’t help you.”

> [@](#):
>
> What about the other ACORN offices where the staff turned him away, reported him to the police, refused to provide him any aid, and in one case tried to convince the phony prostitute to get counseling?

Those offices did nothing wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/313 "2010-06-04T01:09:02Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> He was going to use the proceeds from the prostitution but he wasn’t a pimp?
> 
> What am I missing?

Well, you’re missing the words you quoted yourself from the California AG, for one thing:

> [@](#):
>
> but in his actual taped sessions with ACORN workers, he was dressed in a shirt and tie, presented himself as a law student, and said he planned to use the prostitution proceeds to run for Congress. **He never claimed he was a pimp.**

What do you think the AG meant when he said "he never claimed to be a pimp?

The “money from prostitution” was ostensibly money previously earned by the girl he claimed he was trying to _rescue_ from prostitution.

> [@](#):
>
> No. “They helped him” refers to his original request for assistance from ACORN.

He did not get any assistance at all from ACORN.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/314 "2010-06-04T01:15:26Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> So far as I’m aware, no one actually filed paperwork on his behalf; the jig was exposed before that point was reached. The problem that he exposed was that in some ACORN offices, he could go in and talk about setting up a prostitution scheme and NOT get immediately told, “We can’t help you.”

This is completely false. He did not talk to a single office about setting up a prostitution scheme. If you disagree, please provide the evidence along with an explanation for why all the relevant law enforcement agencies determined that this did not happen.

There was no “jig,” and your insinuation that those ACORN workers were just about to file the paperwork (weeks or months after the stunts took place) only to be foiled by the public “exposure” of what we know were falsified tapes is notuonly baseless, but laughable on its face.

No office made any attempt of any kind to try to help this kid after he left the office.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/315 "2010-06-04T01:52:19Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> … is notuonly baseless…

notuonly, _Adj._, reckless depravity, indicative of corrupt moral character and poor personal hygiene.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/316 "2010-06-04T02:09:09Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> So far as I’m aware, no one actually filed paperwork on his behalf; the jig was exposed before that point was reached. The problem that he exposed was that in some ACORN offices, he could go in and talk about setting up a prostitution scheme and NOT get immediately told, “We can’t help you.”

So essentially the “crime” of this one ACORN office (out of many) is that they did not show this guy the door fast enough, and tell him to piss off?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/317 "2010-06-04T03:26:55Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Well, you’re missing the words you quoted yourself from the California AG, for one thing:
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > but in his actual taped sessions with ACORN workers, he was dressed in a shirt and tie, presented himself as a law student, and said he planned to use the prostitution proceeds to run for Congress. **He never claimed he was a pimp.**
> 
> What do you think the AG meant when he said "he never claimed to be a pimp?
> 
> The “money from prostitution” was ostensibly money previously earned by the girl he claimed he was trying to _rescue_ from prostitution.

That’s kind of hard to wrap my head around. _SHE_ (allegedly) still has proceeds from her prostitution work, and _HE_ putatively intends to use those proceeds to finance _HIS_ run for [public office].

Huh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/318 "2010-06-04T03:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> So far as I’m aware, no one actually filed paperwork on his behalf; the jig was exposed before that point was reached.

Sorry, missed this one.

“The jig was exposed”?? WTF?

You contend that the reason that no paperwork was filed by ACORN to help O’Keefe was because of the “expose”? I’m sure that since you demand cites and proof from us that you won’t mind the same demand made of you? Right?

The timeline will support your suppositions? Paperwork was in the pipeline, only to be nipped in the bud just in time, was it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DoctorJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctorj/32/2904_2.png) [@DoctorJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DoctorJ)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 10:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/319 "2010-06-04T10:33:37Z")

</div>

I think the “use the prostitution money to run for Congress” thing makes it even more likely that the people at ACORN were just humoring him. If someone comes to me and says he’s got a big shipment of crack rock coming in that night, and he’s going to sell it and use the money to work on the spaceship he’s going to fly to Venus, should I report him?

To me, it would be different if O’Keefe had a record of quality journalism behind him, and his transgressions were flukes in an otherwise interesting record. His words would still be suspect, but I might still consider his future work to be worthwhile.

O’Keefe is known for exactly three things: 1.) the ACORN videos, which were misleadingly edited and very misleadingly presented, 2.) being convicted of tampering with a Senator’s phone system (for reasons that remain unclear), and 3.) this nothingburger of an expose on the census. There’s no honest, interesting work to mitigate those. How can you put that together and call this guy anything but a dishonest hack?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2010, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586/320 "2010-06-04T12:44:09Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Well, you’re missing the words you quoted yourself from the California AG, for one thing:  
> What do you think the AG meant when he said "he never claimed to be a pimp?
> 
> The “money from prostitution” was ostensibly money previously earned by the girl he claimed he was trying to _rescue_ from prostitution.
> 
> He did not get any assistance at all from ACORN.

OK, a lot of these claims and counterclaims are flying past each other, in part because we’re referring to different things. So far as I can tell, the California report deals only with the Los Angeles, San Bernadino, and San Diego office visits. So it seems to me that if you say, for example, “He never claimed to be a pimp,” and then refer to the California report, your actual claim is, “In the three California office visits, he never claimed to be a pimp.” Yes?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586.md?page=15)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/acorn-pimp-arrested-for-illegally-accessing-senate-office-tampering-with-phone-system/526586.md?page=17)
