# Addressing An Ex-Pope.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 13, 2013, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161 "2013-02-13T06:53:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 3:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/61 "2013-02-16T03:19:37Z")

</div>

> [@Alley\_Dweller](#):
>
> That’s interesting given that during the State of Union speech and during the campaign debates, President Obama referred to his former opponent as “Governor Romney.” Does Governor fall under the multiple-officeholders rule because there are 50 of them? Or does it fall under the single-officeholder rule because each state only has one of them?

I think it falls under the “It’s not carved in stone anywhere what to call a former officeholder in a democracy, so rather than seem disrespectful by referring to him as ‘Mr. Romney,’ what the hell, I’ll just give him the benefit of his former title” rule.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 7:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/62 "2013-02-16T07:47:34Z")

</div>

Your Holiness while in office.  
Your Ex-Holiness while out of office.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Locrian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/locrian/32/14146_2.png) [@Locrian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Locrian)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/63 "2013-02-16T11:08:26Z")

</div>

Ratzy.

Ratso is already taken.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/64 "2013-02-16T20:47:56Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> Your Holiness while in office.  
> Your Ex-Holiness while out of office.

Your Ass-Holiness would be more amusing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpyOne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/82dd89/32.png) [@SpyOne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SpyOne)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/65 "2013-02-17T13:20:45Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> Perhaps that’s the way its supposed to be, but in practice you commonly hear “President Clinton” or “President Bush” even after they left office.

Not that long ago, people in the media were pretty scrupulous about using the term “former president”. As in, “My guests tonight will be Bono from U2, Stephen Wright, and Former President Bill Clinton.” I am sure there have always been exceptions, but they became a lot more noticeable a few years ago. About a year ago I heard one newscaster refer to, in a single sentence, “Former President Clinton”, “President Bush”, and “Mister Obama”.

A further permutation: is there a hierarchy of elected titles, or does one use the last office held? If someone has been both a Senator and a Governor, which would one call them? And if the proper form for ex-presidents is to drop the title altogether, wouldn’t it be appropriate to revert to the previous title? i.e. Governor Clinton, Governor Carter, and Governor Bush?

Miss Manners may disagree, but I believe it is both simpler and more appropriate to drop the title when the individual leaves office. Sure, include “Former Secretary of State” if you think we might be confused about which Colin Powell you mean, but the only time you call someone “Governor” should be while they are filling that office.  
IMO, YMMV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Critic616](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f6c823/32.png) [@Critic616](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Critic616)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/66 "2013-02-17T14:28:00Z")

</div>

What should you call the pope?  
What you should call any leader of an organization that protected pedopheliacs.  
“Hey you, prisoner 666”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/67 "2013-02-17T15:54:39Z")

</div>

> [@SpyOne](#):
>
> Not that long ago, people in the media were pretty scrupulous about using the term “former president”. As in, “My guests tonight will be Bono from U2, Stephen Wright, and Former President Bill Clinton.” I am sure there have always been exceptions, but they became a lot more noticeable a few years ago. About a year ago I heard one newscaster refer to, in a single sentence, “Former President Clinton”, “President Bush”, and “Mister Obama”.
> 
> A further permutation: is there a hierarchy of elected titles, or does one use the last office held? If someone has been both a Senator and a Governor, which would one call them? And if the proper form for ex-presidents is to drop the title altogether, wouldn’t it be appropriate to revert to the previous title? i.e. Governor Clinton, Governor Carter, and Governor Bush?
> 
> Miss Manners may disagree, but I believe it is both simpler and more appropriate to drop the title when the individual leaves office. Sure, include “Former Secretary of State” if you think we might be confused about which Colin Powell you mean, but the only time you call someone “Governor” should be while they are filling that office.  
> IMO, YMMV.

Many years ago Stephen Jay Gould had an aside in one of his essays about how the proper title of Jimmy Carter was “President Catrter”, not “former President Carter”. Gould’s been dead since 2002, and this wasn’t one of his last columns, so even withouit looking it up I can say that the practice of using “President X” rather than “Former President X” is well over a decade old.

(The issue came up because Carter contacted Gould to make a comment on one of his earlier essays. Garter was evidently a Stephen Jay Gould fan)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/68 "2013-02-17T16:38:59Z")

</div>

> [@SpyOne](#):
>
> …Miss Manners may disagree, but I believe it is both simpler and more appropriate to drop the title when the individual leaves office. Sure, include “Former Secretary of State” if you think we might be confused about which Colin Powell you mean, but the only time you call someone “Governor” should be while they are filling that office.  
> IMO, YMMV.

Early on in Colin Powell’s stint as Secretary of State, the NYT referred to him on second reference as “General Powell,” but there were complaints that this blurred the line between military and civilian authority, and they stopped doing that, referring to him instead as “Mr. Powell” on second reference (just as they refer to the current occupant of the Oval Office as “Mr. Obama” on second reference).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/69 "2013-02-17T17:58:37Z")

</div>

Your Unholiness? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/70 "2013-02-17T18:38:17Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> Your Unholiness? 😃

See post 56.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_Robson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gary_robson/32/3448_2.png) [@Gary\_Robson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_Robson)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/71 "2013-02-17T21:06:49Z")

</div>

> [@Critic616](#):
>
> What should you call the pope?  
> What you should call any leader of an organization that protected pedopheliacs.  
> “Hey you, prisoner 666”

[moderator note]  
Please stay aware of which forum you’re in. While this response would be fine in most parts of the Straight Dope, it’s inappropriate for GQ.  
Thank you. No warnings issued.  
[/moderator note]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Critic616](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f6c823/32.png) [@Critic616](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Critic616)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/72 "2013-02-18T01:12:52Z")

</div>

Noted.  
I regret the comment and apologize.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_diego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7bcc69/32.png) [@the\_diego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/the_diego)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/73 "2013-02-18T07:14:27Z")

</div>

“Governor” AFAIK is a lifetime title, like Ambassador.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/74 "2013-02-18T09:32:29Z")

</div>

> [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](#):
>
> Red Pope, Blue Pope

This one has a litle [car](http://www.dici.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/papamobile-300x216.jpg)  
This one has a little [star](http://www.myspace.com/djpopestar)  
Say, what a lot of Popes there are!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![moriah](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b2d939/32.png) [@moriah](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/moriah)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 11:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/75 "2013-02-18T11:18:00Z")

</div>

One [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/onepope_zps7ae8772e.jpg)  
Two [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/twopopes_zpsb4df2b6b.jpg)  
Red [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/redpope_zps2273b76b.jpg)  
Blue [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/bluepope_zps074bfd16.jpg).  
Black [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/blackpope_zps6b5b81a1.jpg)  
Blue pope  
Old [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/oldpope_zps3ff8ae46.jpg)  
New [pope](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/newpope_zps724ec416.jpg).  
This one has a little [star](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/starpope_zps7241bdbf.jpg).  
This one has a little [car](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/carpope_zps3d5de67e.jpg).  
Say! What a lot  
Of pope there are.  
Yes. Some are red. And some are blue.  
Some are old. And some are new.  
Some are [sad](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/sadpope_zpsac0d44fd.jpg).  
And some are [glad](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/happypope_zpsab5c6ba6.jpg).  
And some are very, very [bad](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/badpope_zpse89e7054.jpg).  
Why are they  
Sad and glad and bad?  
I do not know.  
Go ask your dad.  
Some are [thin](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/thinpope_zps958f7ea3.jpg).  
And some are [fat](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/fatpope_zpsff9129b0.jpg).  
The fat one has  
A [yellow hat](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f346/zombie_guy/Private/yellowhatpope_zpsf266bccc.jpg).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f1d935/32.png) [@CC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CC)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/76 "2013-02-18T17:08:11Z")

</div>

Say, once he’s ex-officio, does he become fallible again?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/77 "2013-02-18T17:13:18Z")

</div>

> [@CC](#):
>
> Say, once he’s ex-officio, does he become fallible again?

Yes. Papal infallibility only holds if the Pope is specifically exercising his office. No office, no infallibility.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/78 "2013-02-18T17:13:42Z")

</div>

Bravissimo, **moriah**! Simply wonderful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![moriah](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b2d939/32.png) [@moriah](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/moriah)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/79 "2013-02-18T17:47:52Z")

</div>

> [@CC](#):
>
> Say, once he’s ex-officio, does he become fallible again?

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> Yes. Papal infallibility only holds if the Pope is specifically exercising his office. No office, no infallibility.

To clarify, he himself was not infallible, the self-identified infallible pronouncements made explicitly ‘ex cathedra’ were infallible (and only two of them ever made). And as explained, that’s a function of the office, not the person (though the person has a lot to do with how the office gets exercised).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161/80 "2013-02-18T19:22:34Z")

</div>

> [@CC](#):
>
> Say, once he’s ex-officio, does he become fallible again?

Push him down the stairs, see what happens.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/addressing-an-ex-pope/650161.md?page=5)
