[QUOTE=tim314]
My point is, we should never just say “Oh well, there’s only one person per X who’s wrongfully convicted. That’s good enough.” We should say, “What reasonable steps can we take to reduce the number of wrongfully convicted people further?”
[/QUOTE]
And the word “reasonable” gets into my initial post. Because at SOME point “reasonable” becomes “unreasonable,” in which case you’ll be declaring that you can live with the innocent people convicted because of not implementing the “unreasonable” action, and then that question comes into play.