# Advanced dinosaur civilization

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 9, 2022, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923 "2022-06-09T16:22:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/201 "2022-06-13T14:43:39Z")

</div>

Just found this website. Looks like exactly what I’m looking for.

> **[PBDB Navigator](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/202 "2022-06-13T15:07:20Z")

</div>

Let’s see if I can link to a specific chart.

> **[PBDB Navigator](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a)**

No preview, but that link should show all animal fossils of the Kimmeridgian age (in the late Jurassic). You can see how unevenly distributed our exploration is. There are huge geographic areas where there’s no scientific information at all. You can browse to other times easily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slash2k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@slash2k](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slash2k)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/203 "2022-06-13T16:10:26Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Well, except for all those stone artefacts we’ve left scattered around …

Most of which will never be seen.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> So, you’re saying we _should_ expect to see an artefact record?

What sort of record we should expect to see depends entirely upon what sort of artifacts were created, the circumstances in which they were deposited, and the subsequent history of the area.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> The Egyptians _didn’t_ develop agriculture.

They didn’t in this version, but that’s a stretch from it is utterly impossible that the Egyptians could ever have done so. (Certainly other groups domesticated crops all on their own without any input from outsiders.) Are you now asserting that stitched clothing is an essential part of “civilization”?

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Stone tools aren’t fossils, they are more durable and much, much easier to find, and would still show up even in e.g. Himalayan strata.

No, they very likely wouldn’t. The Himalayan sedimentary strata are mostly the remnants of ancient seas (limestones, siltstones); stones would most commonly find their way into the sea by being washed down from terrestrial sites. When stones, including stone tools, are caught up in streams and rivers and floodwaters, they tend to get pounded against each other, smoothing and rounding them; with long-distance transport, distinctive toolmarks and evidence of knapping get eroded away. You need sediments formed on land, or at least not involving long moves in water, to preserve artifacts of land-based creatures well.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’m unfamiliar with the dinosaurs that had teeth like beavers…

[Incisivosaurus gautheri](http://www.dinosaur-world.com/feathered_dinosaurs/incisivosaurus_gauthieri.htm)

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> What about them? Dinosaurs [_couldn’t_ pronate their forelimbs](https://paleoaerie.org/2018/06/13/whats-wrong-with-bunny-hands-on-dinosaurs/comment-page-1/#:~:text=They%20found%20that%20no%20dinosaur,facing%20downward%2C%20aka%20bunny%20hands.).

So they couldn’t turn a door handle. Would they have been able to scrape bark from trees, for example?

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> It’s not “unsolved”, there _are_ no houses on the site.

The question you asked, as I recall, was “Where are this civilization’s houses?” No, they didn’t live at Gobekli Tepe; where they did live is unsolved. We’ve found local settlements; is that all there was, or have we just not found what is there?

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Some proportion of them would.

WHAT proportion? ninety-five percent? a tiny fraction of one percent? something in the middle?

If, e.g., five percent of all of the stone tools ever made survive 150,000 years, but only one percent survive a million years, and 0.0000001% make it 50 million, then you would NOT expect to see the same amount or distribution of evidence for dinosaurian tool-making as you do for Acheulean tool-making, even if the initial quantity and type of tools were similar. (This isn’t even getting into factors influencing where researchers look or what actually gets found.)

I’m just making up some numbers here, because I’m unfamiliar with any literature on how many Acheulean tools may ever have existed (we know roughly how many have been found, but not how many were made or how many are still extant but remain to be found). Feel free to supply some numbers yourself. However, if you haven’t at least thought about this question, then you have no rational basis for concluding that you “would” find evidence as you apparently expect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/204 "2022-06-13T16:48:28Z")

</div>

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Most of which will never be seen.

Enough will.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> What sort of record we should expect to see depends entirely upon what sort of artifacts were created, the circumstances in which they were deposited, and the subsequent history of the area.

A complete non-answer.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> They didn’t in this version, but that’s a stretch from it is utterly impossible that the Egyptians could ever have done so.

They weren’t in a locale to actually _develop_ the agriculture they did. Wheat is an Anatolian grass.

But sure, they could possibly have developed an agriculture around papyrus roots. Whatever fantasy story you want to tell yourself.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> No, they very likely wouldn’t. The Himalayan sedimentary strata […]

_Please_ don’t try an explain geology to me like I’m ignorant. There are plenty of terrestrial deposits in the Himalayas.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Incisivosaurus gautheri

Learn something new every day. Boy, is it dorky-looking. So, that’s your candidate for master wood craftsmen, eh?

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> So they couldn’t turn a door handle. Would they have been able to scrape bark from trees, for example?

They could scrape it, but they sure couldn’t plait it into a rope.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> The question you asked, as I recall, was “Where are this civilization’s houses?”

If they’re not at the site, but scattered over the whole area, then Gobekli Tepe wasn’t a settlement and therefore wasn’t part of a civilization.

Show me the city.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> is that all there was, or have we just not found what is there?

The argument from ignorance that is the theme of this whole thread, repeated in miniature.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> WHAT proportion? ninety-five percent? a tiny fraction of one percent? something in the middle?

Somewhere in the middle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/205 "2022-06-13T17:02:38Z")

</div>

I’m tired of repeating myself, so let me try this.

If you pile a thousand extrapolations atop one another, we would have weekend vacations on a terraformed Mars. No one extrapolation is scientifically indefensible. However, the sum total is infinitesimally possible and the likelihood that all the individual steps would be hidden as well is even smaller.

People in this thread are only using dinosaurs as their example because dinos are cool and the movies make them appear a thousand times smarter than any ever were. Substitute any other animal and any other gap and no one would have this conversation. Substitute any creature from cryptozoology and the mocking would be heard from a terraformed Mars, although a similar set of extrapolations could be just as legitimately postulated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/206 "2022-06-13T17:27:04Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> People in this thread are only using dinosaurs as their example because dinos are cool and the movies make them appear a thousand times smarter than any ever were. Substitute any other animal and any other gap and no one would have this conversation. Substitute any creature from cryptozoology and the mocking would be heard from a terraformed Mars, although a similar set of extrapolations could be just as legitimately postulated.

One could apply the above statement to human space travel to find alien civilizations as well. I have been following this thread and the arguments, and I am revising my prior assessment of the possibility of dino civilization (and adding alien civilization) to: Possible: not really (hey, anything’s possible, right?). Probable: No. Likely: No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/207 "2022-06-13T18:38:26Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> No one extrapolation is scientifically indefensible.

Yes, this is exactly what made me start this thread. Our fossil record is incomplete and extrapolation is not necessarily supportable.

For example, looking at Reptiles (which on the linked site includes birds, but not mammals) in four different Early Cretaceous ages: [Berriasian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), [Valanginian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), [Hauterivian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), and [Barremian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a). These cover 24 million years in total. There are large areas with no specimens at all. Although we could extrapolate across large area or from other ages, doing so doesn’t give a lot confidence in what was or was not there and then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/208 "2022-06-13T18:58:01Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Feel free to speculate about Dinosaur Tree Elves in their woven nests with their poetic song-language and chewed twig tools until the hadrosaurs come home. T

If you are gonna put words in posters mouths and not debate politely, then there is no use debating at all. This is FQ.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slash2k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@slash2k](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slash2k)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/209 "2022-06-13T19:49:04Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> A complete non-answer.

No, an answer that takes into account reality. If the artifacts deposited were mostly wood or bone or other organic material, you’re going to get different survival prospects than if they were mostly lithic. If the primary area subsequently ended up mostly under the seafloor and/or under a couple of thousand feet of sediment, less is going to be found than if the area is readily accessible to a future generation of archaeologists. If they lived primarily in landforms not conducive to sedimentary deposits, or areas that were subsequently heavily eroded, less will have survived. Without knowing something about the initial environment and location, the best you can say is “it depends.”

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> They weren’t in a locale to actually _develop_ the agriculture they did. Wheat is an Anatolian grass.

Sorghum, barley, and pearl millet (among others) are African grasses. I already said the Egyptian civilization would not have been exactly the same, but there were cereal grains they could have domesticated instead. (Millet and sorghum, at least, were domesticated in Africa; barley is more complicated, with DNA evidence suggesting most domestic barley descends from a wild ancestor in Israel or Jordan, but locations ranging from Morocco and Ethiopia to Tibet have been suggested as possible domestication sites.)

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> There are plenty of terrestrial deposits in the Himalayas.

There aren’t that many that are both from a potentially relevant time period AND easily accessible to current researchers (much less that have been surveyed well). The Sub-Himalayan sequence is all post-Chicxulub, e.g., while most of the Tethys Himalayan sequence is too old, with a fair bit of pre-Cambrian sediments.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Learn something new every day. Boy, is it dorky-looking. So, that’s your candidate for master wood craftsmen, eh?

No, it’s merely one example of the very wide range of dinosaur dentition, since you were apparently not familiar. Other oviraptorids had parrot-like beaks (but they weren’t birds). Some dinosaurs had needle-like teeth, while others were more akin to blades.

Also remember that teeth need not be used only by the species that grew them. Most dinosaurs shed teeth throughout their lifetime, making discarded teeth available to other to whatever could grasp them.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> If they’re not at the site, but scattered over the whole area, then Gobekli Tepe wasn’t a settlement and therefore wasn’t part of a civilization.

A number of sanctuaries in ancient Greece were not cities; Olympia, for example, was out in the boondocks (they planted wheat in the stadium between Games). Does that mean Olympia wasn’t part of a civilization?

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Somewhere in the middle.

WHERE in the middle, though, determines whether we can realistically expect to find widespread evidence, just a few isolated and cryptic exemplars, or almost nothing at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/210 "2022-06-13T21:56:34Z")

</div>

[Moderating]

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> If you are gonna put words in posters mouths and not debate politely, then there is no use debating at all. This is FQ.

@MrDibble did not put words in posters’ mouths. When a moderator rejects your flag, that’s not a signal that it’s your responsibility to fight back against other posters. Let’s keep things civil, here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/211 "2022-06-13T23:49:58Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> For example, looking at Reptiles (which on the linked site includes birds, but not mammals) in four different Early Cretaceous ages: [Berriasian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), [Valanginian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), [Hauterivian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a), and [Barremian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/2ef50b7a).

Fixing the urls:  
For example, looking at Reptiles (which on the linked site includes birds, but not mammals) in four different Early Cretaceous ages: [Berriasian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/1ea7a60a), [Valanginian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/9269f82c), [Hauterivian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/28a20703), and [Barremian](https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/#/73104efe).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2022, 5:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/212 "2022-06-14T05:04:18Z")

</div>

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> No, an answer that takes into account reality. If the artifacts deposited were mostly wood or bone or other organic material,

… they’d be irrelevant since you don’t build a civilization using just wood and bone tools

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> less is going to be found […] less will have survived.

“less” is not “nothing”

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Sorghum, barley, and pearl millet (among others) are African grasses.

None of which are from, or at least were domesticated, in Egypt. Your fantasy story had Egypt, specifically, developing along the same lines as in an unisolated Africa. My argument is that if Africa is isolated, there’s no reason Egypt develops first at all. In an isolated Africa, the Nile Valley is a sideshow, not a crossroads.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Millet and sorghum, at least, were domesticated in Africa

_Why_ are you telling me things I already clearly know, when I cited centres of origin already?

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> There aren’t that many

So, not none.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> since you were apparently not familiar.

I wasn’t familiar with that _one_ dinosaur. I’m perfectly familiar with the range of dinosaur dentition.

It’s still magical thinking to think one beaver dinosaur means dinosaurs were potentially going to be chewing up a Dinosaur Lothlorien.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Most dinosaurs shed teeth throughout their lifetime, making discarded teeth available to other to **whatever could grasp them.**

So, not our non-pronating theropods, then - a tool you can only wave from side to side is a useless tool.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> Does that mean Olympia wasn’t part of a civilization?

We can very easily point to the cities associated with Olympia. For GT, we can very easily point to the … scattered huts.

Show me the city.

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> WHERE in the middle, though, determines whether we can realistically expect to find widespread evidence, just a few isolated and cryptic exemplars, or almost nothing at all.

By “middle”, I mean 50%, more or less. Maybe 30%, maybe 40%. Plenty enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2022, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/213 "2022-06-14T18:42:24Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> > [@slash2k](#):
> >
> > No, an answer that takes into account reality. If the artifacts deposited were mostly wood or bone or other organic material,
> 
> … they’d be irrelevant since you don’t build a civilization using just wood and bone tools

I read somewhere about a chunk of China that had much less evidence of prehistoric tool use than might have been expected, and the researchers eventually realized that the area without stone tools corresponded to the range of bamboo at the time. A lot of tools that were made of stone elsewhere were likely made of bamboo by the hominids (or early humans, i forget) there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2022, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/214 "2022-06-14T18:49:25Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> A lot of tools that were made of stone elsewhere were likely made of bamboo by the hominids (or early humans, i forget) there.

I’m struggling to see how you could have bamboo hand axes or adzes or … a lot of what stone tools were used for. I can see bamboo replacing _wood_, but stone?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2022, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/215 "2022-06-14T19:01:07Z")

</div>

You can put a pretty good edge on bamboo, and harden it with fire. Then you can use it to cut skins and flesh and wood, is my understanding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2022, 7:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/216 "2022-06-14T19:02:11Z")

</div>

That replaces cutting blades, but not axes and adzes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2022, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/217 "2022-06-15T04:59:56Z")

</div>

I’ve looked into this, and I think you got a slightly distorted impression of [what’s being argued](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movius_Line) - bamboo replaces _some_ stone tools, but not all. Just because there are no Acheulean tools found doesn’t mean there are no stone tools found.

[Basic Mode I](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldowan#Sites_and_archaeologists) stone choppers are still found, and in fact [you need them to process the bamboo](https://www.academia.edu/9194018/Were_bamboo_tools_made_in_prehistoric_Southeast_Asia_An_experimental_view_from_South_China) into the tools that replace the other more sophisticated blades and eventually microliths that occur elsewhere.

And recent Chinese finds seem to be disputing the existence of the line altogether, according to that first Wiki article.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2022, 11:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/218 "2022-06-15T11:07:54Z")

</div>

So those hominids still had stone tools, but fewer, less sophisticated stone tools. That’s certainly consistent with my fuzzy memory. Thanks for looking this up.

On the “dinosaurs didn’t” side, the fact that the range of tool use at varying times and places is so well documented does argue that if dinosaurs developed tools, we would have found some evidence of that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2022, 11:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/219 "2022-06-15T11:14:52Z")

</div>

That and that no dinosaur lineage we know of could have wielded them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2022, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923/220 "2022-06-15T16:10:41Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> On the “dinosaurs didn’t” side, the fact that the range of tool use at varying times and places is so well documented does argue that if dinosaurs developed tools, we would have found some evidence of that.

My wife, who has a degree in geology and passed her language requirement by compiling a dictionary of Middle Kingdom Egyptian hieroglyphs, still goes to digs (pre-COVID) and today was wearing a t-shirt from one with the slogan “Every Flake Tells A Story.”

The double meaning is particularly apt here.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advanced-dinosaur-civilization/965923.md?page=12)
