# Advice on dealing with teenager's professed lack of religious belief

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [October 4, 2010, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029 "2010-10-04T18:50:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kim\_jung\_il](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/54ee81/32.png) [@kim\_jung\_il](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kim_jung_il)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/81 "2010-10-06T04:40:58Z")

</div>

It truly baffles me how people can be afraid of being atheist or have an atheist child.

I suggest being proud of your son. He has weighed up science that has evidence and theories, against religion, with indoctrination and dogma, with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.  
Good on him. He’s made the choice that’s right for him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sisu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@sisu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sisu)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/82 "2010-10-06T05:14:10Z")

</div>

This is a tough one, if you wish him to have a more religious view on life take him to church. I have with my 11yo and explained to him that the bible is just a bunch of stories that show us how to live our lives. Like me, he is into science but does acknowledge a higher power.

One of the ways that a professed athiest can profess belief is to not catoragise this higher power. It can be love of humanity, it can be the jungian collective, it can be a lot of things. All Scouts wants you to do is to believe that a higher power exists, heck I know one 17yo who used logic as his higher power. I am a scout leader, christian and scientist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/83 "2010-10-06T05:53:42Z")

</div>

> [@Skammer](#):
>
> One thing I would ask him is why he thinks science is in conflict with religion. It’s not, at all, and Catholics especially would confirm this.

The scientific method of hypothesis, falsification, and test, is definitely at odds with the principle of religious faith, in which one is expected to accept some level of dogma at face value as being definitionally supernatural.

That isn’t to say that many religions don’t make great strides to accommodate scientific theories that have become generally accepted such as Copernican heliocentricism or Darwinian natural selection, but they typically do so after a period of resistance and often persecution, and only in response to pressure from their constituents to harmonize religious dogma with empirical evidence about the natural world. That isn’t to say that one cannot hold religious or other non-empirical beliefs in one area and still apply rigorous scientific methodology in others, and indeed, many notable scientists have done so, and not just in regard to religion; many accomplished scientists have held utterly flaketastic beliefs about issues separate from their area of expertise. From a Popperian view, the practical application of the scientific method isn’t generally as rigorous as defined anyway; there is certainly an interjection of belief into the formation of a hypothesis and falsification criteria. However, the core of religious faith is the acceptance of doctrine based upon authority, either by an earthly representative (pastor, priest, pope, or whathaveyou) or alleged direct communication with the prime religious entity via prayer or visions that is undocumentable in objective fashion. The core of the scientific method is an ultimate willingness to refine or reject any previous theory based upon new evidence, regardless of what any authority may claim.

> [@robby](#):
>
> Specifically with respect to Christianity, the rational side of me tells me that Jesus Christ was likely just a human, not the son of God.

“He’s not the Messiah. He’s a very naughty boy.”

> [@robby](#):
>
> That being said, I think that I would like him get some moderate exposure to some religious tradition, enough that he might have something he could turn to if necessary or if he desired later in his life. There’s also the cultural knowledge aspect that I think would be valuable.
> 
> I discussed the issue with my wife and son last night, and we might consider attending a church a bit-- maybe just at Christmas and Easter. If he were to just learn some of the basics, even if he doesn’t actually believe in any of it, I think I would be fine with this. At least then he’d know what specifically he’s not believing in, if that makes any sense.

I would argue that this is the wrong approach, at least if you want your son to gain any realistic and objective understanding of religious tradition. Being “Christian on holidays” is like being the prototypical upper class liberal booster for homeless causes without actually being willing to serve a few shifts at a homeless shelter; it’s a feel-good move that really accomplishes nothing. In the case of Christianity, the core ethic is to appreciate and (at least in the Catholic tradition) share in some fashion the sacrifice that the central deities made to preserve their worshipers from eternal damnation, i.e. the father gave his son, and the son allowed himself to be brutally crucified, so that unwashed followers everywhere could ascend to pearly gates and hang around watching their grandchildren run around like spoiled brats, at least according to Family Circus cartoons.

If you want your son to understand religions traditions, where they come from, and what ostensible purpose they serve (as opposed to their actual purposes, which is to bind followers to a particular religious sect or organization) there are plenty of books and courses on comparative religion that explain without inculcating, and may ultimately provide a more balanced and positive point of view of the benefits of organized religion. “Twice-a-year-Christians” are in some ways even more annoying that the usual kind, insofar as their beliefs are generally based on an even less substantial-than-normal understanding of the basic tenets of their belief system. A more consistent attendance and study of the cultural traditions, even if the core supernatural tenets are not accepted–such as is common with many ostensibly Jewish or Hindus–requires more consistency and at least provides the benefit of academic study. If you want your son to actually hold some kind of faith…well, good luck with that. He seems to have formed a belief based upon evidence, and while he may modify it in the future, it’s unlikely at his age that you are going to manifestly influence him to change it dramatically.

On the other hand if you are doing this primarily to pacify the wife, then it is entirely understandable–nothing tears a household apart like a fundamental difference in belief that can’t be rationally negotiated–and you should explain it in those terms to the lad.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 8:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/84 "2010-10-06T08:18:43Z")

</div>

Sounds like a smart kid. Better give him “The Talk” soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gus\_Gusterson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/85f322/32.png) [@Gus\_Gusterson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gus_Gusterson)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/85 "2010-10-06T13:21:37Z")

</div>

> [@Gatopescado](#):
>
> Sounds like a smart kid. Better give him “The Talk” soon.

He’s a Boy Scout, so there’s no need to rush on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desert\_Nomad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/desert_nomad/32/177_2.png) [@Desert\_Nomad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desert_Nomad)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 2:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/86 "2010-10-06T14:05:47Z")

</div>

After my mom remarried she became uber-Catholic. I was about 12 when she dragged us all to church every Sunday. It didn’t work. At 13 I don’t think you have any time left to change him - or that you’d want to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/87 "2010-10-06T14:07:55Z")

</div>

I still think it’s a good idea to let him attend a mass. I think everyone should at least once. It’s just interesting. And, evne though I’m usually against ritual, even that is fascinating.

I do think you do need to try to impress why people are religious, but without the normal atheistic mindset that it is all wrong. That’s the part that is up to him.

I also reject the idea that being curious about whether there is an afterlife is irrational. It’s no more irrational than people who wonder if the world is real. It’s a real philosophical question. It may not be logical, but that’s not the same thing. One things skeptics often forget is that one can and should be skeptical of the skeptics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zulema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/db5fbb/32.png) [@Zulema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zulema)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/88 "2010-10-06T16:43:16Z")

</div>

If he’s really just exploring the realization that science and literal Bible religions don’t work together you can find him some books by Bible scholars who explain the Bible as a book written by humans about their experiences as they saw and understood them in ancient times.

Science and religion or at least spirituality can coexist and the Bible doesn’t have to be taken as the direct word of God. A lot of people think it’s all or nothing but it’s not. Teens can benefit from the church  
community even if they don’t believe everything. Ask what he would like to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/89 "2010-10-06T17:01:16Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> > [@Skammer](#):
> >
> > One thing I would ask him is why he thinks science is in conflict with religion. It’s not, at all, and Catholics especially would confirm this.
> 
> The scientific method of hypothesis, falsification, and test, is definitely at odds with the principle of religious faith, in which one is expected to accept some level of dogma at face value as being definitionally supernatural.

They’re not at odds; they’re unrelated. Most religious beliefs are either of the sort that are unfalsifiable (for example “God exists”) or are historically unique events (for example “Christ is risen”), neither of which are able to be subject to the scientific method because they can’t be tested or falsified.

Religious claims that _can_ be scientifically falsified are generally abandoned, ultimately, in favor of science (geocentrism being one example).

Here I’m talking about mainstream religion like the RCC, not biblical literalists and the fundamentalist fringes.

That’s probably about as far as I can go outside GD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robby/32/11048_2.png) [@robby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robby)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/90 "2010-10-06T17:06:51Z")

</div>

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> > [@robby](#):
> >
> > I would think that would be obvious.
> 
> It’s not at all obvious.

OK, I’ll grant that it might not be obvious. That was a cop-out on my part.

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> If there is an afterlife, there’s no rational reason to believe it will be better than this life. You only think it will be better because that’s what your religion taught you.

I think you are attributing a lot of unwarranted assumptions about my beliefs. The Roman Catholic religion didn’t teach me a whole lot, considering that I haven’t attended church regularly since I was small child. In particular, I do not believe that an afterlife will necessarily be better than this life (though I hope it is). I also don’t necessarily believe there is an afterlife in the first place. I just hope there is one.

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> It could totally suck. The idea that there’s no afterlife should, rationally, be more comforting since the lack of an afterlife means assurance that you won’t suffer after you die.

This doesn’t make any sense to me. By this same logic, you should end your life now because it means assurance that you won’t suffer in the future. While the future might hold suffering in store during life, you hope it doesn’t. Similarly, I hope that the afterlife (if it exists) does not involve suffering.

Incidentally, your comments remind me of the Asimov short story “[The Last Answer](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Answer).” Nevertheless, if there is an afterlife, I do hold out hope that it is less bleak than what you and Asimov imagine.

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> I don’t think you approach these things at all rationally…

I think you would regard any approach other than that of strict atheism as being irrational. I disagree. My approach may not be completely logical and consistent with how I approach other things in life, but I don’t think that it is inherently irrational to hold out hope that there might be a positive afterlife and some point to this life on Earth.

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> …and your son is likely to be put off by any attempt to impose religion on him because all he will get are unsatisfying answers that only serve to reinforce his belief that it’s all baloney.

As I have said repeatedly, I have no intent of _imposing_ religion on my son. I am merely contemplating a belated attempt to introduce him to it, and let him make his own choices.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robby/32/11048_2.png) [@robby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robby)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/91 "2010-10-06T17:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@robby](#):
>
> Incidentally, your comments remind me of the Asimov short story “[The Last Answer](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Answer).” Nevertheless, if there is an afterlife, I do hold out hope that it is less bleak than what you and Asimov imagine.

P.S. I like Asimov’s classic story “[The Last Question](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Question)” much better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Redpill](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/58956e/32.png) [@Redpill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Redpill)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/92 "2010-10-06T17:19:08Z")

</div>

Science can never confirm or deny presence of God. Such is the the nature of Science and of the concept of God.

Everything else is just belief.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/93 "2010-10-06T17:41:31Z")

</div>

> [@Redpill](#):
>
> Science can never confirm or deny presence of God. Such is the the nature of Science and of the concept of God.
> 
> Everything else is just belief.

First, it cannot deny the presence of God as in your statement because God is such a fuzzy concept. Which God? Science can deny several of the Gods believed in by Americans, such as the one who created the earth 6,000 years ago.

As for confirming the presence of God, if God came down and did godlike things, like parting the Red Sea, or rearranging the stars, science couldn’t prove it was god but might be able to state with a high degree of confidence that a godlike being existed. The problem with confirming god is not science, it is that God hasn’t seen fit to do anything lately that would falsify the hypothesis that he doesn’t exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/94 "2010-10-06T17:50:19Z")

</div>

> [@Arnold\_Winkelried](#):
>
> > [@robby](#):
> >
> > That being said, I think that I would like him get some moderate exposure to some religious tradition, enough that he might have something he could turn to if necessary or if he desired later in his life. There’s also the cultural knowledge aspect that I think would be valuable.
> 
> Do you mean any religious tradition, or your own personal religious tradition?
> 
> If you mean any, then I would bring him to a Unitarian Universalist church, like you mention in your OP - that is the best choice (I assume that you are near to a UU church). Most UU churches have a service somewhat similar to a catholic-style service (a minister with a sermon, uu “hymns” during the service) but at a UU church you can be an atheist and also a moderate catholic without having to be hypocritical (professing to believe something in which you don’t). If your wife is totally against the UU church, then ask her how she would like to handle it. If she insists that a Catholic religious education is the only one acceptable, then I would tell her that she first needs to make peace with the Catholic hierarchy and be willing to talk to a priest.
> 
> I see nothing wrong with wanting to teach your children something about religion. It would be wrong to tell him “you **must** believe in God.”
> 
> My experience: my wife and I are both former Catholics, when our children were born we decided that we would like them to know something about religion, so we go to a UU church.

Wow, some UUers seem to proselytize harder than a whole squadron of Mormon missionaries! 😃  
If exposure to religion is desired, I’d suggest reading for background than visits to a number of churches and temples - and even mosques. But with certain exceptions (like being circumcized) there is nothing easier than picking up a religion late in life - it is not like anyone is going to reject him for coming late to the party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Redpill](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/58956e/32.png) [@Redpill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Redpill)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/95 "2010-10-06T18:07:35Z")

</div>

And that is the problem with most religions. Putting too much emphasis on the tale instead of the moral. The tale is easy to refute.

I think of the concept of God as a something or someone beyond us, beyond our understanding, which influences our existence and day to day life without us consciously detecting.

Think of it as waking up locked in a room deep in the hold of a ship in sea and wondering if there’s someone at the helm. You better hope so, or not, your choice. Such are the constraints on our senses, lifespans and futility of argument about God.

Whatever makes one feel better, and makes our time on earth better, should be the guiding principle. We are too insignificant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/96 "2010-10-06T19:29:55Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> Wow, some UUers seem to proselytize harder than a whole squadron of Mormon missionaries! 😃  
> If exposure to religion is desired, I’d suggest reading for background than visits to a number of churches and temples - and even mosques. But with certain exceptions (like being circumcized) there is nothing easier than picking up a religion late in life - it is not like anyone is going to reject him for coming late to the party.

That’s part of the UU educational curriculum 😉

And actually, its a nice part. Not all churches, temples and mosques are really comfortable with tourists. Even “seekers” - which it doesn’t sound like Robby’s son is, need a little guidance. Shoes on or off. Hair covered or not. Women participate in the service? Can the uninitiated enter the temple (take communion, whatever). When we take our sixth graders out on their field trips we work with the community we are visiting to make sure we are welcome and that the kids are taught whatever behavior is appropriate. We’ve worked with many of the same communities for years.

And being UUs, if you discover your spiritual home in someone else’s faith, we will be sincere in wishing you the best (unless its fundie Christianity or Scientology or something like that - even UUs aren’t perfectly non-judgmental on matters of faith).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anne\_Neville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Anne\_Neville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anne_Neville)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/97 "2010-10-06T21:03:10Z")

</div>

> [@Dangerosa](#):
>
> Not all churches, temples and mosques are really comfortable with tourists. Even “seekers” - which it doesn’t sound like Robby’s son is, need a little guidance. Shoes on or off. Hair covered or not. Women participate in the service? Can the uninitiated enter the temple (take communion, whatever). When we take our sixth graders out on their field trips we work with the community we are visiting to make sure we are welcome and that the kids are taught whatever behavior is appropriate.

I’ll recommend a book on this: _How to Be a Perfect Stranger: The Essential Religious Etiquette Handbook._ Good for visiting churches, temples, or mosques, as well as being good for if you’re invited to a wedding or other event.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AClockworkMelon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aclockworkmelon/32/10803_2.png) [@AClockworkMelon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AClockworkMelon)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2010, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/98 "2010-10-06T21:48:41Z")

</div>

Be proud of your son for making the break that you failed to (though it sounds like you’re in the middle of making a break yourself). The older a person gets the less likely they’ll be able to shrug off whatever religious indoctrination they’ve been exposed to. Thank your lucky stars that 1.) you guys didn’t do a great job beating religion into him and 2.) that he’s smart enough to ignore what little religious exposure he’s had.

You say that you’re confused about your own religion (or lack thereof). Good luck with whatever conclusion you finally come to, but I think in the deep recesses of your mind you know what you believe. You’re just fighting against a lifetime of training.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 2:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/99 "2010-10-07T02:40:27Z")

</div>

> [@Anne\_Neville](#):
>
> > [@Dangerosa](#):
> >
> > Not all churches, temples and mosques are really comfortable with tourists. Even “seekers” - which it doesn’t sound like Robby’s son is, need a little guidance. Shoes on or off. Hair covered or not. Women participate in the service? Can the uninitiated enter the temple (take communion, whatever). When we take our sixth graders out on their field trips we work with the community we are visiting to make sure we are welcome and that the kids are taught whatever behavior is appropriate.
> 
> I’ll recommend a book on this: _How to Be a Perfect Stranger: The Essential Religious Etiquette Handbook._ Good for visiting churches, temples, or mosques, as well as being good for if you’re invited to a wedding or other event.

I might have to order that. It sounds wonderful! Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anne\_Neville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Anne\_Neville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anne_Neville)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029/100 "2010-10-07T17:06:23Z")

</div>

At a guess, I’d say most places of worship (at least in the US and Canada) are more prepared for people who don’t know much about them to drop in than they would have been 20 years or more ago. Interfaith relationships are becoming more common and accepted, so it’s getting more common for a Jewish family (for example) to have Protestant in-laws who might come to an event at the synagogue. That means that non-Jews showing up at the synagogue is not going to be a shocking or unheard-of thing at the majority of synagogues.

And it’s not always a huge hairy deal if you don’t observe every fine point of religious etiquette correctly. Mr. Neville forgot to put on a yarmulke before he went into our synagogue’s Rosh Hashanah services. What happened was that an usher discreetly brought him a yarmulke. Nobody made a scene. I doubt that most people in the sanctuary even noticed, or that anyone outside our family remembers it now. If you use some common sense, try to be respectful, and don’t try to make a scene, it’s likely to go well.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advice-on-dealing-with-teenagers-professed-lack-of-religious-belief/556029.md?page=4)
