# Advise your daughter to "get married in \[her\] 20s."

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 26, 2015, 3:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638 "2015-02-26T03:30:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eclectic\_wench](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ac91a4/32.png) [@eclectic\_wench](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eclectic_wench)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2015, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/81 "2015-02-26T23:22:20Z")

</div>

> [@Algher](#):
>
> Fertility and age: [Your age and fertility | BabyCentre](http://www.babycentre.co.uk/a6155/your-age-and-fertility)
> 
> So there is a measurable risk the longer that you wait to have children. If marriage and kids are part of the same equation - marrying younger increases the chances of successful procreation.
> 
> If you don’t want kids, the age of marriage loses relevancy.

Something is seriously up with the info in your link. The graph says that only 52% of women between 35 and 39 are able to get pregnant - which not only sounds like total bollix based on everything I’ve heard, read and seen, but is also completely contradicted within the page itself. For one thing, that _same graph_ says that the infertility rate is 15% for women in that age group, so what happened to the other 33% of women? Also, the same page says, further down:

> [@](#):
>
> Figures for women aged 30 to 34 and aged 35 to 39 are fairly similar, with 94 per cent and 90 per cent conceiving within two years, respectively.

On topic: it would never occur to me to advise my kids on what age they should get married at, or in fact on whether they should get married at all. That’s just plain weird.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urbanredneck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ea5d25/32.png) [@Urbanredneck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Urbanredneck)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/82 "2015-02-27T02:47:17Z")

</div>

> [@bump](#):
>
> And I suspect it works the same way for women. If I had a sane, kind, attractive woman with no kids whose husband just spontaneously combusted, and I had to try and hook her up with single guys I know, I’d be at a total loss. All the single guys I know pretty much are weird, have commitment issues, and are set in their ways and unlikely to be willing to change their lifestyles enough to accommodate a partner if a relationship became long-term. I’m sure there are guys out there who aren’t that way and who are just unlucky, but I also suspect that a lot of the “good” ones have already been married off by the time you hit 40.
> 
> That’s what the advice was trying to point out. It’s not a pattern that you see coming as a young person, until you’re in the midst of watching it happen, and by then it may be too late for you.

I agree. Past age 40 I cant think of a single decent guy I know of whom I would want to hook up with any woman I cared about.

BUT, there was this one guy I worked with at about age 42, ended up divorced and who was good looking, smart, and financially secure and guess what? The women at work found out he was “on the market” again and they came out of the woodwork.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 4:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/83 "2015-02-27T04:15:50Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> You may agree that boys aren’t encouraged enough to think of marriage, but the fact that you’ve _literally_ treated this as a parenthetical idea says it all.
> 
> It’s not parenthetical. It’s exactly why we’re seeing the phenomenon we’re seeing.

Hmmm. So you’re saying women behave the way they do, at least in part, because of the options and incentives men give them. That does sounds reasonable to me.

Now, if we extend that logic, we might conclude that men behave the way _they_ do because … errr … scratching my head here … hmmm … wow, that’s a poser.

It’s parenthetical because the thread is about _advice to young women_, which is something one gives because one thinks said young women are autonomous agents capable of making choices and taking charge of their lives. If you want to start a thread on advice to young men, I promise you I’ll keep any thoughts I have on what young women should be told in parentheses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stui\_magpie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stui_magpie/32/11010_2.png) [@stui\_magpie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stui_magpie)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/84 "2015-02-27T05:20:02Z")

</div>

> [@William\_Hanley](#):
>
> You have obviously have never had a daughter… if your premise is giving advice and expecting it to be followed!

Bingo.

My daughter is 23. She has a boyfriend, she’ll decide when (and if) she wants to get married and who to. I (rightfully) get no say in that discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 8:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/85 "2015-02-27T08:33:31Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> Men historically are the rate limiting step in marriage, not women. They are the ones who do the proposing and they are the ones who usually need to the most prodding to make the commitment to propose.  
> […]  
> amirite?

Nope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merneith](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/57b2e6/32.png) [@Merneith](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merneith)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 10:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/86 "2015-02-27T10:59:11Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> What is the agenda behind stating the obvious?

I would have thought that the agenda was obvious, too. It’s the same agenda that doesn’t like to talk about how [men in their forties are more likely to father autistic, epileptic or schizophrenic children (among a host of other problems).](http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303936704576400161673484394)

That link has an interesting take on it:

> [@](#):
>
> Several months ago, my friend Anna called to complain about her boyfriend of eight months. Bombarded by media warnings about the female biological clock, he wanted to make sure that Anna was fit for childbearing before the relationship moved forward. He had taken her to a fertility clinic where a reproductive endocrinologist drew blood to check her ovarian reserve and injected radioactive iodine into her uterus to ensure that her fallopian tubes were clear.
> 
> Anna is 32. Her boyfriend is 52.
> 
> Anna’s boyfriend was right to be concerned. As women increasingly pursue careers and take advantage of fertility treatments to postpone childbirth into their 30s and 40s, they do place their offspring at risk for countless disorders and diseases. This occurs, however, not because of the woman’s age but because women in their 30s, like Anna, tend to couple off with older men. And when it comes to fathering healthy children, older men, it turns out, are just as much at the mercy of their biological clocks as women.

It’s true that historically, women are willing, (and often required,) to marry older men. More attention needs to be paid to the effect of having older sperm on the child’s health. Even though studies on this have been known for twenty years, somehow, the agenda at play is still aimed at getting girls tied down with early marriages despite how it hurts their long term financial security.

The agenda that wants women to be kept financially dependent on men is long standing and thoroughly documented.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monstro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@monstro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/monstro)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/87 "2015-02-27T15:15:12Z")

</div>

It seems to be yet another thing that women can’t “win”.

If women start talking “marriage and baby” in her late teens, everyone rolls their eyes at her, telling her she needs to find herself first. They laugh at her if she looks for a husband in college (the old “MRS” degree thing) and tell her she needs to worry more about her education–preferably a STEM one. If she starts talking talking marriage+baby right after college, she’s got to sit through lectures about how she and her boyfriend don’t know each other well…how it would be irresponsible for them to start family-making when they’re both pulling in low salaries in an unstable job market…how the demands of graduate school and family conflict with one another…how no one wants to hire a woman if she’s going to just drop out of the workforce a year later and start pumping out babies.

If she waits till she’s in her 30s, she’s gets all this “advice” about how she’s waited too late and it’s her stupid fault for wanting too much out of life. For being selfish.

Women would be best to tune out all the busy-bodies, especially the male ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/88 "2015-02-27T15:41:27Z")

</div>

If you want a taste of a situation in which you really can’t “win” no matter what sex you are - try actually becomming a parent.

You will never do anything right again. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/89 "2015-02-27T15:59:25Z")

</div>

> [@monstro](#):
>
> Women would be best to tune out all the busy-bodies, especially the male ones.

Never mind also that if she marries young, pops out 2 or 3 kids, loses her girlish figure as a result, maybe elects to being a SAHM because she _does_ prioritize motherhood above career (because if she’s in her early 20’s, she likely doesn’t have a career anyway), and then lo and behold, winds up divorced and abandoned, there will be no shortage of people judging her not making smarter decisions. These same types will then judge her for demanding child support and alimony, and they will also tsk-tsk her when she tries to date.

So yeah, anyone advising their daughter to get married in their 20’s without factoring in the nonsense that very well might come with that choice is practicing bad parenting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/90 "2015-02-27T16:06:19Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> So yeah, anyone advising their daughter to get married in their 20’s without factoring in the nonsense that very well might come with that choice is practicing bad parenting.

… just like I said, become a parent and you never do anything right again. 😛 It really doesn’t matter what advice you give your kids - it will always be wrong. Also, failing to advise your kids is even _more_ wrong.

If you kids do well it will be despite you, but if they do poorly, it will be because of you. Guaranteed. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/91 "2015-02-27T16:17:09Z")

</div>

> [@even\_sven](#):
>
> To emphasize income again, the average income of college educated women who marry in their 20s is around $30,000. For those that marry in their 30s, it’s $50,000. That’s an enormous, life-altering gap.
> 
> For men, getting married earlier is associated with higher incomes.
> 
> Kind of implies a screwy dynamic, huh?

But which is the cause and which is the effect? The type of women who earn more are also more likely to focus on their careers first before marriage. And how much of it is due to people, all things being equal, earning more in their 30s than in their 20s?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/92 "2015-02-27T16:51:12Z")

</div>

> [@monstro](#):
>
> It seems to be yet another thing that women can’t “win”.
> 
> If women start talking “marriage and baby” in her late teens, everyone rolls their eyes at her, telling her she needs to find herself first. They laugh at her if she looks for a husband in college (the old “MRS” degree thing) and tell her she needs to worry more about her education–preferably a STEM one. If she starts talking talking marriage+baby right after college, she’s got to sit through lectures about how she and her boyfriend don’t know each other well…how it would be irresponsible for them to start family-making when they’re both pulling in low salaries in an unstable job market…how the demands of graduate school and family conflict with one another…how no one wants to hire a woman if she’s going to just drop out of the workforce a year later and start pumping out babies.
> 
> If she waits till she’s in her 30s, she’s gets all this “advice” about how she’s waited too late and it’s her stupid fault for wanting too much out of life. For being selfish.

You think men get a simple way to “win?” Get married young and your buddies will tell you you need to play the field and sow oats. Wait and women will complain you’re afraid of committement. etc. etc. Granted, it’s different groups of people, but it’s the same in your scenario above.

Nobody gets to make everyone else happy. That’s life.

> [@](#):
>
> Women would be best to tune out all the busy-bodies, especially the male ones.

Interesting that the male busybody in the thread is the one giving the advice about “decide what’s important to you and act accordingly.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/93 "2015-02-27T16:53:39Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> To be sure, no one should get married to comply with some statistic or beat some artificially set deadline. But I think a lot of young people these days have been told that “There will always be time; you can take things for granted.” And many of them are going to wake up one day after being in a 20s mindset for forever and find that they’re 35 or 40.

Bingo! And they’re 35 or 40, and the pool of available, non-losery, non-weirdo, non-psychotic potential partners has significantly dwindled in the meantime.

I think that’s what several of us are trying to point out- things do change over time, and that people should be aware of that, so they can make decisions accordingly.

But that doesn’t mean that it necessarily means that you should freak out and hunt down a spouse ASAP because you’re 31… unless being married is that important to _you_.

There’s no problem with not getting married until later, but I have a feeling that a lot of people just assume that since (in their 20s and early 30s) right now there are plenty of potential partners and plenty of ways to meet them, that it’ll always be that way, including my late 30s and 40s. And this isn’t really true- the population does dwindle, and the signal to noise ratio goes down as well.

To use a personal example, I have a friend who’s 43. She’s extremely attractive, very successful, stylish, kind, loving, etc… Thus far in her life, she’s been very career-focused, and never seemed to want to put the time in to grow and nurture a relationship. Starting in her late 30s though, she started to make more noise about men, etc… and the problem was, at that point the single men that we, her friends knew were mostly weirdos, losers or people otherwise damaged by prior relationships. Combine that with the fact that she’s good looking enough and successful enough for either to be intimidating, and that she’s looking for a guy who meets her concept of successful and attractive enough for her, and the poor girl can’t buy a date.

Which is a shame, because she’s got a lot to offer- she’s surprisingly geeky once you get to know her (she has EVERY MST3k episode on DVD that she dubbed herself, she plays some video games, watches shows like DragonBall Z, etc…) .

I kind of suspect that had she known that the pool of prospective spouses was going to dry up so significantly after she turned about 35, she’d have possibly made a different decision about being so career focused. She seems content, or at least she’s making the best of what she’s got, but I don’t know about truly happy, because I’ve seen her happier overall in the past.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/94 "2015-02-27T17:17:46Z")

</div>

> [@furt](#):
>
> Hmmm. So you’re saying women behave the way they do, at least in part, because of the options and incentives men give them. That does sounds reasonable to me.

Yeah, I do. This is especially the case because men have more influence on when marriage occurs than women do. I guarantee that if you were to poll 100 young adult couples to find out which gender was the most concerned about “where this is all going”, it will more often be the woman.

If you google the words “[marriage", “delay” and "proposal](https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=marriage+delay+proposal)”, the advice columns, blog posts, and personal commentaries are all about men stalling, not women. That’s not a coincidence, either.

> [@](#):
>
> Now, if we extend that logic, we might conclude that men behave the way _they_ do because … errr … scratching my head here … hmmm … wow, that’s a poser.

Because the attention on women is disproportionate to the influence they have on marriage. It’s also in keeping with sexist ideology that insists a woman’s place is in the home, weighed down with kids.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s parenthetical because the thread is about _advice to young women_, which is something one gives because one thinks said young women are autonomous agents capable of making choices and taking charge of their lives.

What a load this is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monstro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@monstro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/monstro)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/95 "2015-02-27T17:19:15Z")

</div>

> [@furt](#):
>
> You think men get a simple way to “win?” Get married young and your buddies will tell you you need to play the field and sow oats. Wait and women will complain you’re afraid of committement. etc. etc. Granted, it’s different groups of people, but it’s the same in your scenario above.
> 
> Nobody gets to make everyone else happy. That’s life.

Getting ribbed on by friends is nothing like having to listen to parents and family and a bunch of faceless strangers on the internet opine about what you should do with your life…as if it’s your societal duty to have babies before anything else.

Everyone would be better off tuning out the annoying peanut gallery. But especially women. Women are always getting told what to do and not to do with their sexuality, even though they are the ones who have to live with all the consequences and all the judgment (see the “single mother” stigma).

> [@](#):
>
> Interesting that the male busybody in the thread is the one giving the advice about “decide what’s important to you and act accordingly.”

There isn’t just one male busybody in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/96 "2015-02-27T17:27:51Z")

</div>

> [@monstro](#):
>
> There isn’t just one male busybody in this thread.

This is a discussion board. We aren’t actually offering advice to anyone, but rather commenting on the reasonableness of the advice in the OP - which the OP invited. No-one in this thread is a “busybody”.

Or is it that simply having a different opinion makes you a “busybody”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monstro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@monstro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/monstro)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/97 "2015-02-27T17:40:17Z")

</div>

> [@bump](#):
>
> Bingo! And they’re 35 or 40, and the pool of available, non-losery, non-weirdo, non-psychotic potential partners has significantly dwindled in the meantime.
> 
> I think that’s what several of us are trying to point out- things do change over time, and that people should be aware of that, so they can make decisions accordingly.
> 
> But that doesn’t mean that it necessarily means that you should freak out and hunt down a spouse ASAP because you’re 31… unless being married is that important to _you_.
> 
> There’s no problem with not getting married until later, but I have a feeling that a lot of people just assume that since (in their 20s and early 30s) right now there are plenty of potential partners and plenty of ways to meet them, that it’ll always be that way, including my late 30s and 40s. And this isn’t really true- the population does dwindle, and the signal to noise ratio goes down as well.
> 
> To use a personal example, I have a friend who’s 43. She’s extremely attractive, very successful, stylish, kind, loving, etc… Thus far in her life, she’s been very career-focused, and never seemed to want to put the time in to grow and nurture a relationship. Starting in her late 30s though, she started to make more noise about men, etc… and the problem was, at that point the single men that we, her friends knew were mostly weirdos, losers or people otherwise damaged by prior relationships. Combine that with the fact that she’s good looking enough and successful enough for either to be intimidating, and that she’s looking for a guy who meets her concept of successful and attractive enough for her, and the poor girl can’t buy a date.
> 
> Which is a shame, because she’s got a lot to offer- she’s surprisingly geeky once you get to know her (she has EVERY MST3k episode on DVD that she dubbed herself, she plays some video games, watches shows like DragonBall Z, etc…) .
> 
> I kind of suspect that had she known that the pool of prospective spouses was going to dry up so significantly after she turned about 35, she’d have possibly made a different decision about being so career focused. She seems content, or at least she’s making the best of what she’s got, but I don’t know about truly happy, because I’ve seen her happier overall in the past.

You may very well be describing me in the next ten years. I’ve always been career-focused and never cared about relationships. But this could easily change.

And you’re right, I would have a hard time jumping into the game at such a late age.

The same way it’s really hard to go back to college when you’re 43.

Or start a new career when you’re 43.

Or do anything new when you’re 43.

Not everyone is ready to go to college when they’re 18. We all know this. But we also know there are real advantages to going to college right after high school. Should a person who is not interested in college go there anyway? No, because someone who doesn’t want to do something isn’t going to be all that great at it. They will just waste their time and money, and make themselves and everyone else around them miserable. They’d be better off doing whatever it is they want to do, that makes them happy, damned what their parents want. Sure, there are trade-offs to going back to college as a middle-aged person. But if you arent ready for something, you aren’t ready for it. No sense in forcing it.

I see relationships the same way. Yes, if I wake up tomorrow with burning in my loins, I’ll probably wish I was twenty years younger. But I also know that 20 years ago, I wouldn’t have been ready to tackle a relationship. I would have been one of those “don’t stick your dick in the crazy” type of girlfriends. Someone who thinks it’s a shame I’m single doesn’t know me that well.

Your friend is content, so I don’t think her life is all that sad. It may seem sad to you because you have something she doesn’t have. But that’s projection. There are so many sad, pathetic, angry people who have SOs that the mere absence of one doesn’t signify anything about the quality of a person’s life, IMHO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![even\_sven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dfb087/32.png) [@even\_sven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/even_sven)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/98 "2015-02-27T18:06:02Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> But which is the cause and which is the effect? The type of women who earn more are also more likely to focus on their careers first before marriage. And how much of it is due to people, all things being equal, earning more in their 30s than in their 20s?

They are looking at income in their mid-30s, so this is accounting for age related income differences. And this statistic is for college educated women, who presumably had some kind of plan for investing the time and money it takes to get a degree.

But the bigger question is, where are the men? Presumably some men “prioritize fatherhood,” but they don’t seem to be penalized financially. And if men aren’t prioritizing family, why not? And why is it that we are being told women are happy to be “liberated” from mind-numbing “cubicle drudgery”, but men aren’t exactly hammering at the door to achieve that same freedom and joy?

We fought for a long time to be able to work. Why did we do that? Because we are crazy? Stupid? Mislead?

Or may it be that financial independence bring fulfillment, security, freedom, and more life options for women, just like it does for men? Obviously not all women want to focus on career, and that’s fine. Im sure a lot of men desire the same, and I would like them to have that freedom as well. But as long as we are working and basically doing the same thing as men, we shouldn’t have to make all kinds of extra choices and trade offs that men have never had to make. It’s just a job and a kid or two. It shouldn’t be somehow unachievable because we have innies instead of outies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/99 "2015-02-27T18:22:07Z")

</div>

> [@monstro](#):
>
> Getting ribbed on by friends is nothing like having to listen to parents and family and a bunch of faceless strangers on the internet opine about what you should do with your life…as if it’s your societal duty to have babies before anything else.
> 
> Everyone would be better off tuning out the annoying peanut gallery. But especially women. Women are always getting told what to do and not to do with their sexuality, even though they are the ones who have to live with all the consequences and all the judgment (see the “single mother” stigma).

[https://www.google.com/search?q=man+up&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8](https://www.google.com/search?q=man+up&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8)  
[https://www.google.com/search?q=men+need+to+grow+up&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8](https://www.google.com/search?q=men+need+to+grow+up&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8)  
[https://www.google.com/search?num=30&q=men+are+losers&oq=men+are+losers&gs\_l=serp.3...98401.100039.0.100237.10.10.0.0.0.0.142.913.5j4.9.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.serp..5.5.502.FMt-URKmQlw](https://www.google.com/search?num=30&q=men+are+losers&oq=men+are+losers&gs_l=serp.3...98401.100039.0.100237.10.10.0.0.0.0.142.913.5j4.9.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.serp..5.5.502.FMt-URKmQlw)  
[https://www.google.com/search?num=30&q=men+are+cowards&oq=men+are+cowards&gs\_l=serp.3...18237.40440.0.40702.18.18.0.0.0.0.205.1924.9j8j1.18.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.serp..9.9.907.0.BEQJwx2mV8A](https://www.google.com/search?num=30&q=men+are+cowards&oq=men+are+cowards&gs_l=serp.3...18237.40440.0.40702.18.18.0.0.0.0.205.1924.9j8j1.18.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.serp..9.9.907.0.BEQJwx2mV8A)

Please, feel free to scroll through.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2015, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638/100 "2015-02-27T18:39:31Z")

</div>

> [@even\_sven](#):
>
> But the bigger question is, where are the men? Presumably some men “prioritize fatherhood,” but they don’t seem to be penalized financially. And if men aren’t prioritizing family, why not?

This was already addressed. Did you miss it?

> [@](#):
>
> And why is it that we are being told women are happy to be “liberated” from mind-numbing “cubicle drudgery”, but men aren’t exactly hammering at the door to achieve that same freedom and joy?

Some women are, some are not. Some men are, some men are not. _Married_ men outearn _married_ women for obvious reasons already elucidated: for good or ill, when couples with children switch to a single breadwinner, it’s almost always going to be the man who works.

For childless people in the same age bracket, there is only a slight income discrepancy, and it’s [in favor of women.](http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/02/24/childless-women-in-their-twenties-out-earn-men-so/)

> [@](#):
>
> We fought for a long time to be able to work.

What was sought was more of a choice. What’s been achieved is switching one societal expectation for another. Whether that’s an upgrade or not is another question.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/advise-your-daughter-to-get-married-in-her-20s/713638.md?page=6)
