I guess I just assumed that people in general had at least a vague idea about what was happening in the world around them.
I had no idea this would offend you. Go figure.
I guess I just assumed that people in general had at least a vague idea about what was happening in the world around them.
I had no idea this would offend you. Go figure.
The true variety show has been dead since Carol Burnett went off the air. That type of entertainment started losing popularity in the 60s (except for a few stragglers). SNL managed to hang on as a sketch comedy show with music, and by showing late at night, when lower ratings were OK.
Audiences are too fragmented these days for variety shows and people will change the channel as soon as they don’t like an act.
Or it would be really funny the first week and then the same tired jokes about cocaine and midget hookers the second and third and forth week until everyone realized that it’s all they talk about.
Sabado Gigante is still on every Saturday night. It’s a mixture of comedy, musical and other acts, and game show. Now that’s what I call a variety show!
I’m not offended- I’m mocking the notion that Jon Stewart provides a model for appealing to a mass audience.
Well, an argument can be made that it’s already dead, because SNL hasn’t been funny or entertaining since 1976 when the Muppets left.
It was never as good after the Muppets left, but it often had funny and entertaining moments well into the 80s.
ETA: In retrospect I’ll say well into 1980.
Thank you, I came in to this thread to post about Sabado Gigante. Where else can you see Shakira, a trained poodle act, an exciting paternity test, and a chance to win a new car all in the same show?
Then you kind of did it wrong. The pale face line doesn’t really work they way you used it. Even if you don’t like it, ie not a pale face, it’s still arguable that the Stewart/Colbert model might help ratings.