OK, so this is a “technical” argument rather than what actually will be used in the trial. In the Gutierrez-Reed trial, the prosecutor presented an expert witness to testify what the industry standards are and why those standards were not being followed in Rust and directly linked that as evidence of Gutierrez-Reed guilt.
As they didn’t use your arguments, then that debate seems more of a theoretical GD discussion.
As someone who got sucked into the armorer’s trial, and will likely follow Baldwin’s trial, I’ll stick to the issues relevant to this case.