# Alphabetizing

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 8, 2006, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604 "2006-02-08T22:23:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/1 "2006-02-08T22:23:51Z")

</div>

My _Wonderfalls_ DVD box set arrived in today’s mail. Very exciting, having the chance to see those episodes I’ve still managed to miss in repeats on LOGO, but it does give rise to a question. On my DVD shelf, does _Wonderfalls_ get shelved before or after _Wonder Woman_? W-O-N-D-E-R-F certainly comes before W-O-N-D-E-R-W, but there’s that space…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FatBaldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecd19e/32.png) [@FatBaldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FatBaldGuy)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/2 "2006-02-08T22:28:43Z")

</div>

In most alphabetizing methods I have seen, the space counts as a letter and comes before “A”, so Wonder Woman would go before Wonderfalls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/3 "2006-02-08T22:29:21Z")

</div>

After. _Wonder_ trumps _Wonderf_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![twickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ec9cab/32.png) [@twickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/twickster)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/4 "2006-02-08T22:37:23Z")

</div>

I prefer to ignore spaces, so I’d do Wonderfalls, Wonder Woman.

Either system is fine, as long as you do it consistently – I will point out, however, that both the phonebook and Leonard Maltin’s Film Guide are with me on this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cunctator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/43a26b/32.png) [@Cunctator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cunctator)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/5 "2006-02-08T22:47:23Z")

</div>

I’d agree with **twickster**. Anyway, since it’s your collection, do whatever seems logical to you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jayrot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Jayrot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jayrot)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/6 "2006-02-08T22:56:12Z")

</div>

> [@Cunctator](#):
>
> I’d agree with **twickster**. Anyway, since it’s your collection, do whatever seems logical to you.

NO! You must do whatever seems logical to Leonard Maltin!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/7 "2006-02-08T23:11:30Z")

</div>

> [@Otto](#):
>
> On my DVD shelf, does _Wonderfalls_ get shelved before or after _Wonder Woman_?

The answer, as you might expect around here, is “Yes.”

There are two schools of alphabetizing, both with strong adherents and standard conditions for usage. One goes letter by letter, the other word by word. So “Wonder [Woman]” precedes “Wonderfalls” on the same principle that B precedes Ba’athist. Or “wonderw…” follows “wonderf…” on normal alphabetical usage.

As far as your home DVD library goes, you have complete freedom to do whichever you wish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2006, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/8 "2006-02-08T23:55:14Z")

</div>

Well, I know that space was treated as a letter before A when I shelved books at my junior high school library.

Leonard Maltin is a punk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmkeller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmkeller/32/118_2.png) [@cmkeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmkeller)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/9 "2006-02-09T00:37:17Z")

</div>

I personally ignore spaces and would put Wonderfalls first. However, I’m not about to suggest that my preferences are necessarily the only way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/10 "2006-02-09T00:50:43Z")

</div>

Hm. Space “comes before A”? That makes no sense to me.

If you have a bunch of titles that have the same first word, you have to move on to the second as a tiebreaker. Like so:

Wonder Bar  
Wonder Boys  
Wonder Woman  
Wonderfalls

The word “Wonderfalls” comes after “Wonder,” alphabetically, so you wouldn’t insert it between “Wonder Boys” and “Wonder Woman.”

Think of a title like a name. You wouldn’t alphabetize like this:  
John, Sam  
John, S. Bertram  
Johns, Harold  
John, Shelly  
Johnson, Albert  
John, Steve

You’d do it like this:

John, S. Bertram  
John, Sam  
John, Shelly  
John, Steve  
Johns, Harold  
Johnson, Albert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/11 "2006-02-09T00:54:14Z")

</div>

You can use either method, as long as you’re consistent.

Counting the space really only came into play when computers started being used for alphabetizing. Humans can ignore a space, but with a computer, it’s easier not to.

FWIW, the OED ignores spaces (e.g., “Perfect storm” comes after “perfectory.”), as does Leonard Maltin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/12 "2006-02-09T00:58:30Z")

</div>

I’ve got a detailed Excel database of my CD collection. In Excel, “Wonder” is before “Wonder(space-something)” which is before “Wonder(something).” It makes sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 8:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/13 "2006-02-09T08:23:29Z")

</div>

OK, well, I’ve decided to shelve _Wonderfalls_ ahead of _Wonder Woman_. But only because, if I shelved it after, I’d have to put different seasons of _Wonder Woman_ on different shelves, and as much as I love the alphabet I love having multiple DVD seasons, CDs, books and so forth all together on the same shelf more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 10:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/14 "2006-02-09T10:49:43Z")

</div>

My DVDs are not in alphabetical order at all, not even a little bit. I use a genre organisational method - therefore, _Wonder Woman_ would go next to _The Flash_ and _Batman_, while _Wonderfalls_ would fit in next to _Joan of Arcadia_ and _Tru Calling_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/15 "2006-02-09T16:24:18Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Hm. Space “comes before A”? That makes no sense to me.
> 
> If you have a bunch of titles that have the same first word, you have to move on to the second as a tiebreaker. Like so:
> 
> Wonder Bar  
> Wonder Boys  
> Wonder Woman  
> Wonderfalls
> 
> The word “Wonderfalls” comes after “Wonder,” alphabetically, so you wouldn’t insert it between “Wonder Boys” and “Wonder Woman.”
> 
> Think of a title like a name. You wouldn’t alphabetize like this:  
> John, Sam  
> John, S. Bertram  
> Johns, Harold  
> John, Shelly  
> Johnson, Albert  
> John, Steve
> 
> You’d do it like this:
> 
> John, S. Bertram  
> John, Sam  
> John, Shelly  
> John, Steve  
> Johns, Harold  
> Johnson, Albert

**Lissener** outlines very coherently the word-by-word system of alphabetizing here. But not all lists-to-be-alphabetized fall into this simple system, so the alternative of letter-by-letter system, ignoring spaces and punctuation, is an alternative. For example, is that user’s name **Mr Invisible** , two words, **MrInvisible** , one run-on word, or **Mr-Invisible** or **Mr\_Invisible** , with typography intervening. And does it matter? In such a case, you opt to go letter by letter, putting him after **Miss Interpretation** and **Mr Black** and before **Mrs Moose** and **MunkeyShines**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/16 "2006-02-09T16:25:35Z")

</div>

From the perspective of a mathematician or computer scientist, “Wonder Woman” comes before “Wonderfalls”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/17 "2006-02-09T17:22:19Z")

</div>

> [@Polycarp](#):
>
> **Lissener** outlines very coherently the word-by-word system of alphabetizing here. But not all lists-to-be-alphabetized fall into this simple system, so the alternative of letter-by-letter system, ignoring spaces and punctuation, is an alternative. For example, is that user’s name **Mr Invisible** , two words, **MrInvisible** , one run-on word, or **Mr-Invisible** or **Mr\_Invisible** , with typography intervening. And does it matter? In such a case, you opt to go letter by letter, putting him after **Miss Interpretation** and **Mr Black** and before **Mrs Moose** and **MunkeyShines**.

Respectfully, Poly, the examples you give are equally esoteric and irrelevant. In your first series, each username is A) a single “unit,” being for all intents and purposes an unbreakdownable name. Let me explain: since there are no realy rules for usernames, and since many of them are one-word constructions (like yours and like mine), the only way to treat them consistently is to treat them ALL like one-word constructions. THus, if I were alphabetizing usernames, and not real first-name/last-name names or books on a shelf, I’d alphabetize exactly as you suggest. In other words, the rules necessitated for the esoteric, exceptional example of usernames cannot be taken to be universally applicable to more standard rules for such as books. And B), in your second series, the “title”–Mr, Mrs, Dr–is universally understood to be outside of the process. Just as you ignore “The” when alphabetizing books, you ignore “Mr” when alphabetizing names. Unless, as in my A), it’s an irreducible like a username.

I neglected to cover all such esoteric eventualities in my response, because we were talking about titles on a shelf.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2006, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/alphabetizing/343604/18 "2006-02-09T21:42:09Z")

</div>

What gets me is “St.”. Do you assume it is spelled out and alphabetize it like “Saint”? Does St. Elsewhere come after “The Saint”? How about a hyphenated St. like “St.-Smith”? Or St. John, which Brits pronounce as one word?
