# Am I alone in hating the rise in video for online news?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [June 30, 2016, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798 "2016-06-30T18:05:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/21 "2016-06-30T20:24:42Z")

</div>

I too agree with the OP. It’s especially annoying for those on metered accounts or with limited bandwidth. And they have a 15-30 second advertisement beforehand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/22 "2016-06-30T20:27:22Z")

</div>

You are not alone, I hate it too. Give me articles, internet, not videos, when it comes to news.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Helena330](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/helena330/32/531_2.png) [@Helena330](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Helena330)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/23 "2016-06-30T20:32:09Z")

</div>

Clearly, their research didn’t include asking the Dope! Maybe a younger demographic wants their news via video (which doesn’t give me much hope for the younger demographic).

I, too, would much rather read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![romansperson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/romansperson/32/17100_2.png) [@romansperson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/romansperson)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/24 "2016-06-30T20:37:18Z")

</div>

> [@Jennshark](#):
>
> Dislike the video “enhancements” in most venues. When I’m info seeking online I pass up videos in favor of reading material 90% of the time.
> 
> I wonder if this preference has a positive correlation to age? I’m 49yo.

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> so, either the SDMB is not a representative sample of the world at large, or these news sites haven’t done much market research. I suppose it could be as simple as they can force ads into the videos, but elsewhere then can be ignored.

It’s both these things. In a communications class I took about a year and a half ago, we were told that a) the young 'uns (in this case those age 25 and under) often prefer watching videos online over reading text, and b) it is another way to force people to watch ads. So I guess some content providers consider this a double win.

Since this was a graduate class aimed at working professionals, there was no one 25 or under in it, and the general opinion about this development amongst the class was pretty negative. Those with kids, however, said their children do indeed spend a lot more time than they do watching videos of all kinds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robby/32/11048_2.png) [@robby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robby)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/25 "2016-06-30T20:47:17Z")

</div>

I wholeheartedly agree, for numerous reasons:

[ul]  
[li]I can read much faster than a talking head can read a story to me. Also, the vast majority of news videos are short and full of fluff. I can read the same amount of info presented in a typical 3-minute online video in about 30 seconds, and a written story usually contains far more information. [/li][li]I’m either in a quiet place where I don’t want the audio to disturb others, or I’m in a loud place. Either way, I need to put earbuds in to hear the audio, which is a pain in the neck.[/li][li]The video usually takes forever to load, and is frequently preceded by a 30 second ad. They also chew up data.[/li][li]The video is likely to either not load or crash my browser, especially on my iPad or iPhone. (This is also true with websites full of other crap on the page.)[/li][/ul]  
A couple of years ago, I used to regularly read news online on [CNN.com](http://CNN.com) and [MSNBC.com](http://MSNBC.com). Both are almost completely worthless to me now.

Now I find myself usually reading [BBC.com](http://BBC.com) or [TheGuardian.com](http://TheGuardian.com).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rhiannon8404](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rhiannon8404/32/17929_2.png) [@Rhiannon8404](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rhiannon8404)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/26 "2016-06-30T21:04:59Z")

</div>

Yep, I agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![usedtobe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ec9cab/32.png) [@usedtobe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/usedtobe)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/27 "2016-06-30T21:05:20Z")

</div>

Video = Entertainment. For this, video was invented.

Back in the 60’s, the New York Times once ran the transcript of the CBS Evening News, in toto.  
It took about 10" of single-space column.

I can’t decide which is worse - the slow pace of video (a 3 minute video to include an 8 seconf video (and the video WAS the story) or the huge verbiage being written about a factoid that could be expounded, in much greater detail, in 300 words.  
“Click here to read more” - and that is after enough verbiage to have told the story.  
And gawd help the fool who clicks - prepare to be bored to tears looking for the actual story lost in a sea of “get paid by the word” text.

Luckily, I’m old enough to have heard all the “News” at least twice before.  
“Nothing new under the Sun”…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snfaulkner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snfaulkner/32/433_2.png) [@snfaulkner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snfaulkner)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/28 "2016-06-30T21:34:22Z")

</div>

I’ve been to Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq so I can safely say without hyperbole that video news (especially autoplay) is 10,000,000 times worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/29 "2016-06-30T21:45:36Z")

</div>

The rise of the Internet means that straight news reporting (X happened to Y on Z date) has become a straight commodity. For any news story for which a video exists, there also exists a thousand purely textual accounts of that same story. If you don’t like video news, fine, go to any of the thousand other places to read your news.

But it’s also meant that it’s pretty much impossible to make any significant money off straight textual reporting. As soon as you put out any kind of report, it’s reblogged and excerpted by a thousand different aggregators who you’re now competing with. Video at least provides the barest of a defensive moat. If I excerpt several paragraphs from your reporting without your permission and add the barest skeleton of connective tissue, that’s generally considered commentary and is fair use under US law. If I stitch together segments of your video and rehost it without your permission, that’s generally considered copyright infringement and you can send a takedown notice to remove it.

Everyone here can relax and get their panties unbunched. It’s not that video is replacing textual news in any meaningful sense, all of the text news you could get before, you still can get. Rather, it’s that publishers are ceding text news to Reuters, AP and the thousands of aggregators that churn the stuff together and are focusing on video news as a supplement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FairyChatMom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fairychatmom/32/21906_2.png) [@FairyChatMom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FairyChatMom)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/30 "2016-06-30T21:50:19Z")

</div>

I don’t like to watch videos - I’d rather read a story. In fact, on the rare occasions when I do watch a video, I have to turn on my speakers. I prefer quiet computing. So hush! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anny\_Middon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bc79bd/32.png) [@Anny\_Middon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anny_Middon)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/31 "2016-06-30T21:51:30Z")

</div>

I not only dislike video news online, I also dislike slide show news. When the story is headlined “Average Tax Bite per State” I want to see a list of the states with typical taxes paid in each. I don’t want to have to click through 40 states to discover that mine is indeed in the top 10.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtur88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e9c0ed/32.png) [@jtur88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jtur88)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/32 "2016-06-30T21:53:11Z")

</div>

What I find even more annoying is the sports sites, where I go to see the latest sports scores on games in progress, and I have to wait for their featured video highlights to load before the scoreboard appears.

But I understand why they do this. Most of the news/sports internet sites are sources that also have TV networks as their big revenue taps, and they are pitching their TV video.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thelurkinghorror](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7c8e57/32.png) [@thelurkinghorror](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thelurkinghorror)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/33 "2016-06-30T22:29:47Z")

</div>

> [@Anny\_Middon](#):
>
> I not only dislike video news online, I also dislike slide show news. When the story is headlined “Average Tax Bite per State” I want to see a list of the states with typical taxes paid in each. I don’t want to have to click through 40 states to discover that mine is indeed in the top 10.

[http://deslide.clusterfake.net](http://deslide.clusterfake.net)  
Works pretty well, though not with all sites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/34 "2016-06-30T22:33:02Z")

</div>

I have almost zero interest in any video online unless I go to youtube. And if I go to youtube I’m more likely to download it and run it in QuickTime player instead. Web browsers aren’t very good video players and streaming video sucks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dracoi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90db22/32.png) [@dracoi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dracoi)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2016, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/35 "2016-06-30T22:48:53Z")

</div>

> [@Shalmanese](#):
>
> The rise of the Internet means that straight news reporting (X happened to Y on Z date) has become a straight commodity. For any news story for which a video exists, there also exists a thousand purely textual accounts of that same story. If you don’t like video news, fine, go to any of the thousand other places to read your news.
> 
> But it’s also meant that it’s pretty much impossible to make any significant money off straight textual reporting. As soon as you put out any kind of report, it’s reblogged and excerpted by a thousand different aggregators who you’re now competing with. Video at least provides the barest of a defensive moat. If I excerpt several paragraphs from your reporting without your permission and add the barest skeleton of connective tissue, that’s generally considered commentary and is fair use under US law. If I stitch together segments of your video and rehost it without your permission, that’s generally considered copyright infringement and you can send a takedown notice to remove it.
> 
> Everyone here can relax and get their panties unbunched. It’s not that video is replacing textual news in any meaningful sense, all of the text news you could get before, you still can get. Rather, it’s that publishers are ceding text news to Reuters, AP and the thousands of aggregators that churn the stuff together and are focusing on video news as a supplement.

Can you give me an example of these thousands of website with text-based content?

Maybe I’m looking in the wrong places, but what I find is just enough text to drive search engine results, with lots of video content. Other than pay wall sites, I’m not seeing a lot of good text content.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2016, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/36 "2016-07-01T01:39:28Z")

</div>

> [@Jennshark](#):
>
> Dislike the video “enhancements” in most venues. When I’m info seeking online I pass up videos in favor of reading material 90% of the time.
> 
> I wonder if this preference has a positive correlation to age? I’m 49yo.

I agree completely. I can read a story much faster than watch a video. I’m 67.

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Agreed. I want to read the story, and if there is a video, have an option to look at it. Not to mention that I’m often in a public place on my PC and don’t want random audio clips going off.

This seems obvious to me-- LOTS of people are going to be looking at news sites on their phones, computers, kindles, etc. in places where they can’t have audio blaring out.

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> so, either the SDMB is not a representative sample of the world at large, or these news sites haven’t done much market research. I suppose it could be as simple as they can force ads into the videos, but elsewhere then can be ignored.

Of course, the SDMB is not a representative sample of the world at large. We are much smarter, better looking, wittier, more literate, skinnier, have better hair, and cuter dogs/cats/children, and are just generally more darling than the _\<fill-in-the-blank\>_ that comprise the “world at large.” You knew that already, didn’t you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/b77776/32.png) [@oara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/oara)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2016, 3:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/37 "2016-07-01T03:29:37Z")

</div>

Video is slow and loud and awful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2016, 9:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/38 "2016-07-01T09:53:57Z")

</div>

Thanks for your input. Either we are a much more discerning bunch than whoever the target audience for news media is, or the people in charge of news sites are clueless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nightshadea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/7ba0ec/32.png) [@nightshadea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nightshadea)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2016, 10:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/39 "2016-07-01T10:30:59Z")

</div>

oh whats worse is the slideshow from some place like [answers.com](http://answers.com)…you click through 3 pages of ads for 4 lines on what ever it they suckered you in with

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2016, 11:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798/40 "2016-07-01T11:02:10Z")

</div>

I’m another one fed up with video “news” and autoplay. Pretty much all my pet peeves have been covered already in this thread.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-alone-in-hating-the-rise-in-video-for-online-news/758798.md?page=3)
