# Am I the only Republican here?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [August 31, 2006, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991 "2006-08-31T22:00:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2006, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/121 "2006-09-04T20:16:50Z")

</div>

Yes, you. Again, why not? What \*is \* your idea of an “ideal fiscal conservative”, if balancing the budget isn’t part of it (or even all you can realistically expect)? And do you hold the parties to different standards when deciding who to vote for - one has to be “ideal” while the other does not? Sure looks that way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2006, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/122 "2006-09-04T20:17:11Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I grew up in the 70’s and 80’s. When I was forming my political opinions it was pretty clear which party was pro-military and which was not.

What constitutes a strong military is a matter for debate. Republican administrations tend to strengthen the military by increasing quantity; Democrats tend to strengthen the military by increasing quality. Let’s say the air force has 5000 fighter planes and you’ve got to replace 1000 of them; you can build 1200 more of the same type of planes or 800 newer and better planes. Which solution is a better idea? Either one, depending on the specific details of each situation. But a Republican would claim that he’s trying to strengthen the air force by expanding it while the Democrat are weakening it by shrinking it - and the Democrat would claim that he’s trying to strengthen the air force by giving them better planes while the Republican is weakening them by making them use older planes that aren’t as good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2006, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/123 "2006-09-04T20:31:17Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=ElvisL1ves]  
Yes, you. Again, why not? What \*is \* your idea of an “ideal fiscal conservative”, if balancing the budget isn’t part of it (or even all you can realistically expect)? And do you hold the parties to different standards when deciding who to vote for - one has to be “ideal” while the other does not? Sure looks that way.  
[/QUOTE]

Oops, I have hijacked this thread haven’t I?  
Okay, I do hold the parties to different criteria. Though not on fiscal matters.  
I consider it a political crime that the Republican President and VP are effectively draft dodgers. I let democrats slide on the same issue, because it seems like the best thing for a Dem to say is “Hell yes, I was against the Vietnam War”.  
I clearly said, I do not consider any President in my lifetime to have met the Fiscal conservative criteria, so I am not using a different standard there. I will freely say that Clinton was the most fiscally responsible of the Presidents from Carter to today. I am sorry that is not enough.

**Little Nemo** : Reagan built a huge Navy that required a lot of manpower and threw a lot of money into developing new and better weapon systems and especially defensive weapons. I consider him the ideal President for a Hawk. I do not like many of his domestic policies. I despised his environmental policies. But Reagan was the best friend the military has had since Teddy Roosevelt.

Reagan’s admin push many very good systems that were started under Carter or Nixon, he also seemed to throw money at almost any aspect of the military except for our pay. I felt the US was at a military low following Vietnam and Carter’s failed rescue of the hostages. Reagan made us the most powerful nation in the history of the world in less than 8 years. He nearly bankrupted us, but he did bankrupt the Soviet Union.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2006, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/124 "2006-09-05T03:43:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> But Reagan was the best friend the military has had since Teddy Roosevelt.

Reagan spent billions putting forty year old battleships back to sea. The money would have been a lot more effective if he’d given every member of the armed forces a 10% pay raise.

The issue of what effect Reagan’s military spending had on the collapse of the Soviet Union has been discussed many times on this board and it would be a hijack for me to reopen it. Suffice it to say that it’s hardly a proven fact that one caused the other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2006, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/125 "2006-09-05T04:03:20Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Little Nemo]  
Reagan spent billions putting forty year old battleships back to sea. The money would have been a lot more effective if he’d given every member of the armed forces a 10% pay raise.

The issue of what effect Reagan’s military spending had on the collapse of the Soviet Union has been discussed many times on this board and it would be a hijack for me to reopen it. Suffice it to say that it’s hardly a proven fact that one caused the other.  
[/QUOTE]

Yes, of course, but the Battleships did make excellent flagships and with their missile refit made a good dual-purpose shore support unit with ridiculous armor. The old BBs showed the flag like few other ships could and were a moral boost to the Navy and had tremendous appeal to those in the Navy to serve on board. I would have had to Re-up for 4 years to get assigned to the New Jersey. I know, I checked at the time. I also mentioned that Reagan threw money at all military investments, some good and some foolish. I will not concede the BBs were foolish, they were great for morale and flag waving, this had a legitimate Foreign policy value. He did lay down the works for the new Nuke carriers that have largely replaced the conventional pigboats I served on from the fifties. He ordered most of the modern ships we have. Reagan’s Navy buildup was incredible and allowed us at its height to project our power anywhere in the world and to fight a 3 front war with a reserve. Check the weapons programs, he threw money at both overhauling the incredibly efficient B-52s and most of our modern stealth jets. He spent money on all aspects. He had money set aside for research into energy weapons and of course the half crazy Space Shield. The military morale was very low in 1980, by 1988 the morale was very high. We believed we the best in the world in every respect.  
Air, Sea and Land.  
Subs and Satellites.  
We had the #1 Special Forces unit in the world in the SEALS.  
We had the best pilots in the world and the second best.  
We were prepared for almost every contingency and when asked to respond in Iraq under the first Bush, almost everything worked like clock work from the ancient BBs and B-52s to the very state of the art Smart Bombs, Stealth Fighters and FAE bombs. We cleared a path through the largest minefield ever seen by bombing it out of existence. Our tanks and trunks worked without problems. If anything had active radar, it was found and destroyed instantly. Did we need to be this strong and powerful, that is another debate, but we were that strong and powerful.

Of course it is not a proven fact that Ronny’s buildup finished of the USSR, but it is my opinion and strangely enough we were discussing the forming of my opinions.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/126 "2006-09-13T17:53:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=silenus]  
May we ask why? I’d like to know what argument worked.  
[/QUOTE]

(Referring to my statement that I’d changed my stance on gun control)

See the thread I’m about to start in IMHO.

Don’t want to hijack this one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tibby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tibby/32/17030_2.png) [@Tibby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tibby)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/127 "2006-09-13T21:41:29Z")

</div>

Republican  
Fiscal conservative, social moderate

I was afflicted with a modicum of liberalism as a child, Thorazine cured me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/128 "2006-09-13T23:16:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Monstre]  
I’m actually kind of confused about what was **done** with the surplus I heard about during the last couple of years of Clinton’s presidency, because from [these numbers](http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpenny.htm), the debt certainly didn’t decrease over any of the years of surplus. If it was applied towards the debt, then I can only assume that the interest compounding throughout the year grew the debt faster than the annual budget surplus amount was able to pay it. (And I’m sure there may have been other factors I’m not aware of affecting these numbers).  
[/QUOTE]

There wasn’t an actual surplus. The government was still spending more money than it was taking in, and the debt was still increasing. It’s just that a lot of the debt was “off budget” debt, like Social Security, and more of it was projected surplus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThisSpaceForRent](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thisspaceforrent/32/345_2.png) [@ThisSpaceForRent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThisSpaceForRent)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/129 "2006-09-13T23:24:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FormerMarineGuy]  
Exactly what the question asks. I consider myself an open-minded guy (as most of you can see by my posts on this board), and am ready for the hits I might take. But…am I the only Republican here?  
[/QUOTE]

…Hopefully!!

😃😃

But on a serious note, Dem or Rep mean little to me…personal idiology is much more relivanet.

have fun, live long…and prosper.

tsfr

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedFury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ec9cab/32.png) [@RedFury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedFury)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/130 "2006-09-13T23:58:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=danceswithcats]  
I’m a registered Republican who looks at candidates from both parties, and sincerely wishes that the Dems would truly give me another choice.  
[/QUOTE]

Do you actually mean _BushCo_ is a choice for you?

_:::shudders:::_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2006, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991/131 "2006-09-14T00:07:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=galen]  
Really? Sounds to me like you’re a Clinton Democrat.  
[/QUOTE]

To the extent that “Clinton Democrat” means “someone who didn’t like Clinton and rarely votes Democrat,” sure. Seems like it might confuse people, though.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/am-i-the-only-republican-here/370991.md?page=6)
