Nope.
Pennsylvania Dutch is a cultural designation (or perhaps linguistic, if you consider the PA dutch dialect to be a defining criteria), not a religous one. The term refers to the decendents of early settlers that William Penn recruited from the Rhine Valley and surrounding areas in what is now (mostly) Germany. Penn offered land, and a promise of religous freedom both of which were fairly attractive, as this area of europe was involved in some pretty hefty warfare at the time (much of it with a religous flavor, as it was wise to at least appear to practice the same religous beliefs as the area landholder).
Some of the original PA Dutch settlers practiced anabaptist religions, including the Amish, the Mennonites (and these are different (but similar) religions, not varying “degrees of isolation”), the Swenkfelders, and many many others (including several which refer to their members as “brethern”). But many other original PA Dutch settlers were Lutherens, or Catholics. It’s just that these religions had larger followings, and therefore never became linked with the PA Dutch in people’s minds. One of the oldest Catholic churches in PA is in a strong PA Dutch area, and was founded by some of those very settlers Penn rounded up in Germany.
While it is still correct to say that most modern day Amish ( and isn’t that an odd phrase
) do come from PA Dutch cultural heritage, and many speak the PA Dutch dialect as their primary language at home, it is far from correct to imply that all PA Dutch are belivers in one of the anabaptist sects.
The PA Dutch are an extremely long surviving island of culture. Most PA dutch families are 200-250 years or more removed from Germany, and yet they remain identifable here in the US.
My family is PA Dutch, and have lived in Berks County PA or surrounding areas for the last 250 years. However, my Grandfather (born in 1915, less than 40 miles from Philadelphia) spoke PA Dutch as his primary language, and only learned English as a teenager. Historically speaking, my ancestors were mostly Lutheren (with a few Catholics), not anabaptists, and believe me, I’m far from Amish.
And for the OP. Amish communities separate themselves from the outside world by forgoing the use of technology and the trappings of the modern world. What this means specifically is defined by each individual community. There is no single rule book. 150 - 200 years ago, the Amish didn’t appear outwardly much different from their “English” neighbors, most of whom were also farmers [ Note: “english” is a term used by the Amish to refer to their non-amish neighbors, most of whom speak English as their primary language. It has nothing to do with actually being from England or of English decent] . Now, as the modern world evolves and changes faster and faster, and technology takes an ever increasing role in all of our lives, their lifestyle seems strikingly different.
Increasing land prices in many areas have made it difficult for some Amish communities to maintain the primarily agricultural lifestyle they held in the past. It has simply become cost prohibative for each family to support themselves on their own farm. These communities often sanction “trade” with the “english”, producing furniture, crafts or foods for sale to the general public (like those you encountered in the Reading Terminal Market), or becoming involved in the tourist trade. Other communities have made the decision to allow their members to work for the “english” (construction or housekeeping are popular). In the course of employment, some Amish are permitted to use some technology that they would not be allowed to own for their personal use, they can ride in cars (but usually not drive them), use power tools, or vaccum cleaners etc. but what they can and cannot do is still largely decided by the community
The money earned in any of these pursuits belongs to the person/family who earned it. However the Amish function as a comunity in the truest sense of the word, and will not hesitate to lend or give funds to community members in need. For example, they do not use the “english” system of insurance, but rather assist their own in times of need. They use the same hospitals and doctors as everyone else, but they by cash of medical services. They are not required to contribute to Social Security, nor are they eligable to collect it’s benefits.
Sorry for the enormous post 