# Amazon.com removes queer and trans books from bestseller lists

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 12, 2009, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853 "2009-04-12T16:23:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tnetennba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7993a0/32.png) [@tnetennba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tnetennba)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 10:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/41 "2009-04-13T10:45:24Z")

</div>

> [@tumbleddown](#):
>
> The only problem is, even if someone _was_ gaming the system by sending in numerous complaints about certain titles/categories of books, that would mean that Amazon has no controls in place to prevent this. Also, people who have worked for Amazon or interviewed for Amazon have stated that there is a human in the stream between “receive a complaint” and “live edit to the site” so where does that component come into play in such a scenario? And how does this explain the messages sent to authors about “adult material” and how their decidedly non-adult, simply LGBT material, was de-ranked?
> 
> Then they need to say so. “Something went very wrong, it appears that there was a massive problem in our system somewhere. We don’t know where. We need to investigate further to understand it. We did not do this on purpose, and we will restore rankings, and figure out how this happened.” That’s pretty simple. Instead, they’re giving us contradictory stories and talking about “glitches” and that’s not reassuring. And yes, it’s a weekend and yes it’s a holiday. But the internet is open 24/7 and Amazon is an international company. As such, you have your head of PR/marketing on call, 24/7, ready to make a _real_ announcement to your customers and the media on something that’s blown up this huge, this fast. You don’t dick around with bullshit language like “glitch.”

My impression is that they didn’t know what was going on until Sunday night and they haven’t had much chance to either investigate it or to prepare the comprehensive statement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baldwin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baldwin/32/7264_2.png) [@Baldwin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baldwin)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 11:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/42 "2009-04-13T11:08:07Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> You’re wrong. I’d far rather be tortured to death by a chainsaw wielding maniac that live in a world in which Amazon removes the rankings from LGBT books. If you wouldn’t, that just proves what a bigot you are. And, like all bigots, totally devoid of an ability to recognize deliberate hyperbole or humor. Which I find horrifying.

Hyperbole without a good reason tends to devalue good words like “horrify”.

Goddamnit, you made me agree with **Starving Artist** about something. Now I have to shower.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ichini\_Sanshigo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/d9b06d/32.png) [@Ichini\_Sanshigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ichini_Sanshigo)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 12:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/43 "2009-04-13T12:36:55Z")

</div>

I was inclined to believe the “We’re all being trolled” theory, but if it’s true that there’s a live human in the process between receiving the complaint and pulling the page rank, then I don’t know what to make of this.

It’s Monday morning. How long do you think it’ll be before we get an actual, non-scripted, non-generic statement from Amazon?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/44 "2009-04-13T12:57:38Z")

</div>

> [@Baldwin](#):
>
> Goddamnit, you made me agree with **Starving Artist** about something. Now I have to shower.

Really? You’re asking God to damn something over a little hyperbole? Ask God to damn disease, ask God to damn a murderer, ask God to damn America, I’ll understand. But you’re really reaching if you’re asking for God to damn something just because of a little misunderstanding on a messageboard. I’d go so far as to say you’re devaluing the word. Right now I’d put its value at $43.97, six cents less than before you trivialized goddamnit.

And don’t even get me started on your having to shower.

As for the outrage over the first link under “homosexuality” being an anti-gay book, I’m not upset by that. Although it’s no longer true, it use to be true that when you Googled “Jew”, the first link would be an antisemitic site called “Jew Watch.” It was a byproduct of how the algorithm worked: among other things, folks talking friendlylike about Jews tend to use other words (Judaism, Jewish people, even Jews) more than they used the word Jew.

I suspect something similar is going on here. This thread is all about homosexuality and Amazon’s weirdness thereto. But if you search the thread for the word “homosexuality,” the only time it shows up is in relation to this one weird search result: otherwise, folks are using words like queer, gay, and LGBT. I suspect that the word “homosexuality” is used much more often by homophobes than by queer-friendly sorts, explaining why a homophobic book would be the first result when searching for homosexuality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/45 "2009-04-13T13:14:40Z")

</div>

How the hell do you define a “gay” book? Were they just bumping off material labeled by its publisher as LGBT-related, or any book with gay characters, or what?

I mean, Steven Fry’s books always have a gay protagonist, but I wouldn’t call them LGBT fiction. Iain Banks novels sometimes have characters who have variously been lesbian, gay, bisexual _and_ transgendered during their lives…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/46 "2009-04-13T13:15:01Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I suspect something similar is going on here. This thread is all about homosexuality and Amazon’s weirdness thereto. But if you search the thread for the word “homosexuality,” the only time it shows up is in relation to this one weird search result: otherwise, folks are using words like queer, gay, and LGBT. I suspect that the word “homosexuality” is used much more often by homophobes than by queer-friendly sorts, explaining why a homophobic book would be the first result when searching for homosexuality.

Maybe (although in my experience, “homosexuality” is way more common and non-pejorative than “homosexual”). But when I do a search for “homosexuality” at [chapters.com](http://chapters.com), only one of the books on the front page is anti-gay. None of the top 20 or so search items at [borders.com](http://borders.com) is obviously anti-gay. For the _top_ item at [amazon.com](http://amazon.com) to be anti-gay (not just anti-gay, but promoting ex-gay movements) – as well as at least three of the other search results on the first page – relative to these other booksellers indicates something’s badly askew.

And it stands to reason, because as has been pointed out, this has had the effect of suppressing or even completely eliminating the de-ranked books from common searches. When I search for “dancer from the dance,” the current edition is _nowhere_ in the search results; I have to click on a used edition and go through the author’s name before I can find it, and it took me the better part of an afternoon to figure that out.

So, yeah. Having LGBT books eliminated altogether _en bloc_ from search results in by far the world’s largest online retailer is incredibly worrisome to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/47 "2009-04-13T13:15:17Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> If [amazon.com](http://amazon.com) said they were unlisting books because of their “adult” content and those included books with gay sex scenes, but not books with straight sex scenes, then how is that just an accident/glitch? It sounds like they knew what they were doing. And based of what I’ve seen of what they have and haven’t unlisted, it looks really bad for them.

It could be as simple as someone applied a rule based on taxonomy, expecting it to remove “adult” content and not realizing that the Amazon taxonomy put Gay-themed books under Adult. Or they have a multi-noded taxonomy and it had unintended consequences.

These systems are rule and taxonomy driven, no one looks at individual titles except in extremely rare events. The systems are complex and it’s fairly easy to make rules changes without fully understanding the ramifications.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/48 "2009-04-13T13:18:00Z")

</div>

> [@matt\_mcl](#):
>
> Maybe (although in my experience, “homosexuality” is way more common and non-pejorative than “homosexual”). But when I do a search for “homosexuality” at [chapters.com](http://chapters.com), only one of the books on the front page is anti-gay. None of the top 20 or so search items at [borders.com](http://borders.com) is obviously anti-gay. For the _top_ item at [amazon.com](http://amazon.com) to be anti-gay (not just anti-gay, but promoting ex-gay movements) – as well as at least three of the other search results on the first page – relative to these other booksellers indicates something’s badly askew.

What I like about you, **matt** , is that you provide incredibly persuasive evidence for your posts. So yeah, consider my earlier speculation retracted: it looks like this isn’t a peculiarity of the language, but is rather a result of their bizarre delisting thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/49 "2009-04-13T13:32:45Z")

</div>

Roger Ebert complained about the rating given to a movie about two young gay males. I wish I could remember the name but it was certainly from within the last 10 years or so. The movie didn’t have enough foul language, sexual content, or nudity to be rated R but it was given that rating because it was about two gay males.

Supposedly Steve Jackson Games stopped doing RPGA events because TSR got their panties in a bunch over SJG’s adventure. It featured the standard rescue your true love adventure except this time the true love was a male and so was the rescuer. About as much sex and romance as you’ll find in most other role playing games but the gay element was too much.

I can certainly understand this type of thing happening with Amazon 10-15 years ago. I think it’s a bit odd to happen in 2009. It just strikes me as being so silly. I wonder if _Ammonite_ by Nicola Griffith is “adult?”

Odesio

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tnetennba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7993a0/32.png) [@tnetennba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tnetennba)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/50 "2009-04-13T13:41:40Z")

</div>

I don’t think the facts of the case are in dispute, that [Amazon.com](http://Amazon.com) had some craziness this weekend. What I dispute is the narrative behind it, that Amazon as an entity decided to do this on the quiet, got busted by heroic Twitterers, and are now denying it and lying about it. I would believe it in a heartbeat if it was Walmart, but I need better evidence to believe it of Amazon. The Occam’s razor explanation of a bunch of fundies gaming the system or a disgruntled homophobic database manager simply seem way more likely. But the story for me has become something else and something more disturbing – SNS give people the power to make a lot of noise in a short amount of time, and since the noise becomes news, it makes them feel validated for having been in on a mob. I don’t care much about Amazon, but I’m wondering what overnight witch hunts we will see in the near future. Our outrage meters are set to “very sensitive”; our wait and see setting is shut off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/51 "2009-04-13T13:43:54Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> Supposedly Steve Jackson Games stopped doing RPGA events because TSR got their panties in a bunch over SJG’s adventure. It featured the standard rescue your true love adventure except this time the true love was a male and so was the rescuer. About as much sex and romance as you’ll find in most other role playing games but the gay element was too much.

Really? Who are they worried about offending? The fundie elements who make up the bulk of gay haters already think TSR is evil for promoting devil worship and such.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/52 "2009-04-13T13:49:27Z")

</div>

This looks more like passive homophobia on the part of Amazon than active. Still, with the speed of non-news these days, if something negative about my company were all over the internet, I’d want to know and respond quickly. Perhaps Amazon corporate doesn’t have email. The fact that they didn’t respond suggests that it’s low priority and / or they aren’t on top of it. Neither is a surprise. Neither makes me happy, of course, but it’s too early to show up at the warehouse with pitchforks. I did order some books from [ABE.com](http://ABE.com) instead. Frankly I’m a little more worried about discrimination from the government and the general public than on the part of one specific book distributor.

I wonder if it’s part of a broader plot to discourage reading and thinking on the part of the trolling organization’s sympathizers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/53 "2009-04-13T14:55:03Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Really? Who are they worried about offending? The fundie elements who make up the bulk of gay haters already think TSR is evil for promoting devil worship and such.

There was a time when Dungeons and Dragons got rid of all there references to devils and demons for PR reasons and they didn’t make a return until the 3rd edition. I suppose it could be related to that. Also, and I hate to say it, but those who play D&D or other role playing games aren’t really any more enlightened than the general population nor are they any more intelligent. At least in my experience.  
Odesio

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/54 "2009-04-13T15:05:28Z")

</div>

> [@cricetus](#):
>
> the story for me has become something else and something more disturbing – SNS give people the power to make a lot of noise in a short amount of time, and since the noise becomes news, it makes them feel validated for having been in on a mob. I don’t care much about Amazon, but I’m wondering what overnight witch hunts we will see in the near future. Our outrage meters are set to “very sensitive”; our wait and see setting is shut off.

One hell of a good point.

We like fast, snappy media in this culture - and that means we like fast, snappy decisions and pronouncements. Get the opinion out there and strike while the iron is hot.

I’m not sure it delivers a “mob” frisson, though, because the mob is not right there at your elbows. What it does give, though, is an instant, cheap high of empowerment.

“Wait and see” not only doesn’t deliver the buzz - _the medium and the pace of information exchange itself_ is unsuited to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/55 "2009-04-13T15:10:15Z")

</div>

There is an upside to that, and that is you don’t have to wait very long. But an alarming story will always have more energy than its calmative antidote.

\*A lie can travel halfway round the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. \*

- Mark Twain

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/56 "2009-04-13T15:19:18Z")

</div>

The guy at this link (warning: definite troll, not necessarily honest, not necessarily SFW) claims to be behind the issues at Amazon, claims it to be a relatively simple hack of their system: [http://community.livejournal.com/brutal\_honesty/3168992.html](http://community.livejournal.com/brutal_honesty/3168992.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/57 "2009-04-13T15:32:52Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> Also, and I hate to say it, but those who play D&D or other role playing games aren’t really any more enlightened than the general population nor are they any more intelligent. At least in my experience.

Certainly not when it comes to gender issues. Sure, it’s OK for a male roleplayer to play a “sexy” female drow wearing less than I floss my teeth with, but if that same male tried to play a normal, gay, human, you should see the fur fly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aangelica](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b2d939/32.png) [@Aangelica](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aangelica)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/58 "2009-04-13T15:35:02Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> The guy at this link (warning: definite troll, not necessarily honest, not necessarily SFW) claims to be behind the issues at Amazon, claims it to be a relatively simple hack of their system: [http://community.livejournal.com/brutal\_honesty/3168992.html](http://community.livejournal.com/brutal_honesty/3168992.html)

This right here is why I’m not getting my panties all bunchy over this at the moment. It seems pretty plausible that there could well be some form of loophole in Amazon’s system that lets outside parties tinker with the rankings. It just seems more likely than stealth ninja corporate homophobia on the part of a gigantic corporation not known for their conservative politics. If this is the case, and I’m Amazon, I probably don’t want to discuss the matter publically until I can figure out what the fuck is going on. Admitting there’s such a loophole may placate the outraged, but it encourages the goddamn trolls. Which leads to more outraged people, etc.

Given that all this blew up over the course of a holiday weekend - yanno, when people aren’t in the office (and, frankly, often not even at home) and that it’s now not even noon EST (and barely normal business hours PST where Amazon’s corporate HQ is) I’m not all that dismayed that they haven’t had much in the way to say about it. It’s gotta take a certain amount of time for their tech people to figure out what the hell happened and arrive at a fix (or at least a patch to keep it from happening while they institute a real fix). Until then, I’d think “avoiding feeding the goddamn trolls” is going to be the corporate strategy.

Frankly, in my personal opinion, this is more of an “Oh well _shit_” moment than an “OMG It’s an _emergency_! Cancel vacation time immediately! Call everyone in for OT!” moment for Amazon. I’m just thinking that “some asshole is screwing with our rankings to aggravate the LGBT community” doesn’t engender the same sort of corporate urgency as “someone hacked the checkout system” might.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/59 "2009-04-13T15:41:39Z")

</div>

They still sell vibraots and lube though, right?  
Phew. You’ve got to throw something in your cart with that erotic classic _Heather Has Two Mommies_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d6d6ee/32.png) [@wolfstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfstu)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2009, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853/60 "2009-04-13T15:58:11Z")

</div>

> [@matt\_mcl](#):
>
> FWIW, a search for “Homosexuality” currently gives as its first result _A Parent’s Guide to Preventing Homosexuality_. Barf.

I looked up that book just now, and amazon has a preview on the site. As the author begins to propose the kernel of his thesis on why little boys grow up queer, he gives this argument on page 24:

> [@The aforementioned book](#):
>
> “The penis is the essential symbol of masculinity – the unmistakable difference between male and female. This undeniable anatomical difference should be emphasized to the boy in therapy. As psychoanalyst Richard Green has noted, the effiminate boy (whom he bluntly calls the “sissy boy”) views his own penis as an alien, mysterious object. If he does not succeed in “owning” his own penis, he will grow into an adult who will find continuing fascination in the penises of other men.”

OH GOD WHAT IS THAT THING HANGING OFF MY PELVIS? Whatever it is it’s making me want to suck cock.

(I will hereafter refer to this alien, mysterious object as my UFO – Unidentified Fucking Object. Meanwhile, off to be a man-whore!)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amazon-com-removes-queer-and-trans-books-from-bestseller-lists/492853.md?page=4)
