I’ve posted this before. As someone who played football in high school and rugby in college, there really is no comparison. Rugby is a rough sport, no doubt, but sort of more along the lines of amateur wrestling. The pads in football, otoh, essentially allow you to use your body as a weapon, with the goal being to hit someone as hard as you can on every single play, often running at top speed.
As to the dangerousness of football, I can’t find it right now, but I saw a study that said that NFL offensive linemen have a life expectancy in the low 50’s. That blew my mind.
I take your point about comparing football in high school and rugby in college. But an international test match does involve contact that comes close to some collisions if not all in the NFL. Particularly any match with Fiji, Tonga or Samoa. But yes in general Football is a far more physical sport.
I’ve often found the treatment of concussion in the NFL a bit troubling. A concussion in rugby is a mandatory two week rest. In the NFL it seems as if they can be thrown back in as soon as they can stand. Maybe I’m wrong.
I’ve heard that 50 year life expectancy thing thrown around a bit, but I assume that if your over 300 pounds then you could play chess and still be at risk.
As for the comments about rugby cheerleaders, over here in Munster we make do with a drunk fella with a megaphone. Beat that!
Maybe getting your “bell rung” is the euphemism for a concussion where you go right back in when you’re not stumbling anymore.
catsix, I was not necessarily suggesting this as a real rule change, but it’s the sort of change you’d need to get rid of concussions. An alternate thought is to reduce the size/effectiveness of shoulder pads. You can’t execute a high speed shoulder-first “tackle” if it’s going to injure you more than the target.