Realistically ER do withhold service. When I was a young thing, I answered the phones in the ER and a lot of the service is “directed” we’d call it. For instance the ambulance driver would be diverted when the called in from a bad area where don’t have the insurance or a lot of poverty. We’d push into standby for lesser emergencies. We were a trauma center, so if a heart attack victim came we’d divert them simply “balance” the system, cause a heart attack can be handled by almost all ERs.
And we would also ship rapidly too. If a person came in with a knife wound, he’d be stablized extremely fast and shipped to the county hospital.
As for Hill Barton, that was a good act but in reality it is worth nothing. What that basically says is a hospital will provide so much free service in exchange for indigent patients…
Now when’s the last time in a major city a new hospital was built, as in NYC, Chgo or Philly or Boston. These were done probably in the 60s or earlier. The Hill Barton commitment was usually for 25 years. Some hospitals have it in perpituity. But still all Hill Barton says is you have to provide “SO MUCH” free care, the distribution is left to the hospital.
So let’s say thru Hill Barton the hospital has to provide 1 million a year. Now remember in the 50s and 60s when these hospitals were built that was a lot of money but it isn’t now for people with major problems. So the hospital can provide all it’s free service from January 1 of the current year and by the middle of the month used up ALL it’s required money and be done with their charity care under Hill Barton. Or they can apply $100 toward each patients bill and do that till the 1 million is used up.
Like everything there is the law and how it’s applied and it’s not done fairly but if you do not have insurance you can bet after you’re stabalized you’re last on the list.