# Americans Condone Rape of Iraqi Children

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 17, 2004, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630 "2004-07-17T22:34:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Mudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f14d63/32.png) [@Larry\_Mudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Mudd)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2004, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/61 "2004-07-18T21:35:56Z")

</div>

> [@SPOOFE](#):
>
> Or do you think we shoudl condemn all Arabs because of the handful that blew up a few buildings? I sure don’t, but hell… “It’s just a few bad apples, CHECK”.

I think that’s a pretty weak analogy, given that “It’s just a few bad apples,” is offered as a defense of a military heirarchy with a Commander-in-Chief at its head. It’s a piss-poor defense, too, given that before GWB assured everyone that “Instructions went out to our people to adhere to law… That ought to comfort you,” the White House solicited legal analysis from John Bybee that redefined ‘torture’ in such a way that was calculated to allow just about any extremity.

> [@](#):
>
> Physical pain accompanying torture must be equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily functions or death. ([.pdf link](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/dojinterrogationmemo20020801.pdf))

Beyond that, knock yourself out. Letter of the law.

There are more and more indications that the abuses at Abu Ghraib are institutional.

It would be a closer analogy to ask if characterizing the 19 hijackers as “just a few bad apples,” absolves al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, rather than a vague ethnic category.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atticus\_Finch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Atticus\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atticus_Finch)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/62 "2004-07-19T02:28:22Z")

</div>

Why has Sy Hersh dropped this description of the rape in the middle of a speech, rather than staying quiet until his article has been written? Why would he leak his most shocking material - is this a standard journalistic procedure?

Does anyone know if there is an article on this topic coming out soon? If so, any idea when or where - the New Yorker, I presume.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 3:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/63 "2004-07-19T03:06:47Z")

</div>

Now, _that_ is an interesting question.

This is very odd news, really. Its not exactly _breaking_ news, the rumors have been around ever since Rummy’s droll little hint about stuff much worse in the offing. His phrasing, IIRC, was about “murder and _worse_”. Is baby rape worse than murder? Is in my book, but mileage varies.

My wild ass guess? Hersh is talking to people who already know what we are just now being shocked about, an ACLU convention. Lots of lawyers, reporters, that sort. Better informed than we. People who aren’t surprised that this isn’t getting a lot of coverage in the tedia, who are probably afraid to touch it, fearing that it will be revealed to be a hoax, and they’ll look like liberal media jumping on a sensational story to embarass the regime.

(Actually, that’s kind of weak…)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 3:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/64 "2004-07-19T03:08:48Z")

</div>

P.S. Tomorrows _New Yorker_ isn’t up yet, frequently gets up Sunday night, but not always. Maybe this story scares the _NY_ staff, Sy Hersh has a solid rep, but this stuff is poison and dynamite, _whichever_ way it breaks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atticus\_Finch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Atticus\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atticus_Finch)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/65 "2004-07-19T04:04:58Z")

</div>

Ok, I’ve been thinking about this for a while, so how about this for a WAG: Hersh is floating the idea and seeing how it goes. He’s putting it out in front of an audience that’s very likely to be on his side in this matter, so that bit of the delivery is safe, he’s not under the control of any editorial board and won’t hurt his magazine if the story sours, as it would if he published in the New Yorker at first. He / his editors are now monitoring how it spreads through the blogosphere and whether it filters into any Western media before they decide whether or not to put it out as a full story.

Another WAG - he’s hoping to put more pressure on a vital source by saying “we’re on to you…”.

Yet another WAG - he wants the Pentagon / White House to issue a denial, so he can get them for ordering paedophilic rape AND lying about it. Though I don’t see why anyone would give a damn about the lies, if paedophilic rape is proven, so this is probably a weak guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/66 "2004-07-19T04:31:06Z")

</div>

I think you are on the scent, **Lambchop** , but there’s something missing. Yes, the ACLU is probably more sympathetic an audience than he might find just anywhere, but not spectacularly so. I suspect that, even as lefty as they may be, they are much like myself: the last thing they want to hear is another dreadful and disheartening story about our people. Things are bad enough, no need to look for more.

As well, just as I said, this is not a “scoop”, there are enough rumors about, and reports in the foreign press, to render that impossible. This story hit the German press more than a week ago. Perhaps the real story lies in the silence of our own servile tedia. At any rate, he is not jealously guarding it, as he might if he had a real exclusive, it would have Pulitzer written all over it. As good a reporter as Mr. Hersh is, I don’t credit the notion that he doesn’t care about that. Of course, I don’t know him from Adam, but he’s a reporter, so its a pretty good guess.

So my guess is similar to yours: he is trying to get the story out in more than one way, he doesn’t want to be the only guy holding this bag of shit if it all blows up. The Bushiviks would just love a story like this to be spread about, and then thoroughly disproved, _Faux News_ would talk about it for a month before they took a breath, and they would mention his name every third word.

Still, something missing…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atticus\_Finch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Atticus\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atticus_Finch)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 5:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/67 "2004-07-19T05:27:18Z")

</div>

If there was something about to appear in the New Yorker or some other major US news source, wouldn’t its existence and likely publication time be leaked ahead of time?

That is, if there’s something that’s going to be in the next online edition of the New Yorker, which is apparently coming soon, wouldn’t we know it was coming, or at least know something along the lines of “Seymour Hersh has a big story coming out re Abu Ghraib in the next New Yorker”? So if we don’t know this yet, would it mitigate against the story breaking properly in the next few days?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atticus\_Finch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Atticus\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atticus_Finch)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 5:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/68 "2004-07-19T05:28:43Z")

</div>

It looks like this week’s online edition has just come out today, so presumably there’ll be no revelations there anytime soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 5:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/69 "2004-07-19T05:31:25Z")

</div>

Well, yeah, but the story has more or less “broke”, its been published overseas. Doesnt seem to be a big HAD (hairy ass deal) developing over it, which, by my reckoning, there by God ought to! Has the Arab press covered it? Al Jazz? Dunno. Probably could find out if I weren’t so lazy and easily …look! Shiny!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Mudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f14d63/32.png) [@Larry\_Mudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Mudd)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 5:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/70 "2004-07-19T05:53:33Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Has the Arab press covered it? Al Jazz?

Natch, but it’s not terribly information-dense:

[U.S. hides videotapes of new abuse cases at Abu Ghraib](http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=2741).

I don’t think Seymour would approve of this attribution:

> [@](#):
>
> The Bush administration is hiding videotapes of these crimes, said Hersh,

It reads a little differently than “Some of the worst things that happened that you don’t know about. OK? Videos.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 6:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/71 "2004-07-19T06:12:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Still, something missing…

There’s not enough pressure behind the story yet. This is something that America very much does NOT want to know about.  
Look at this story:

> [@](#):
>
> “We’re still uncovering, as late as this morning, other incidents, other cases, that will be promptly investigated by the Department of Defence,” said Warner.
> 
> “Each day it comes along – new incidents, revelations of new incidents that occurred in the past” which may contravene Geneva Convention rules prohibiting physical and mental torture of detainees.
> 
> Warner’s committee is trying to schedule a public hearing next week with Paul Bremer…
> 
> But **more public hearings will have to wait until fall, said Warner, when they won’t jeopardize the rights of soldiers standing trial on abuse charges**.

[London Free press](http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2004/07/16/544526.html)

It looks like big news with talk of new allegations every day, meetings with Bremer, yet it’s gotten very little stateside coverage.  
How about that lame excuse for delaying tactics in the last line? It’s flying.  
People want it to fly either for political reasons, or because they don’t want to know the truth.

While the discovery that [Sanchez himself authorized the use of dogs at Abu Ghraib](http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-07-19-iraq-dogs_x.htm), may provide a little traction, it’ll take a continuing parade of stories like this: [Detainees in US desert camp plead to be handed over to Iraqi custody](http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=6381)

> [@](#):
>
> why don’t you rescue us from this hell?" pleads a prisoner behind a high fence at this US-run detention center on Iraq’s border with Kuwait where temperatures can soar to 60 degrees Celsius (140 degrees Fahrenheit).  
> …  
> The US military says it now plans to expand and transform Camp Bucca, named after a firefighter who died in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York’s World Trade Center, into a long-term detention facility for the most serious offenders, which would include those held in Abu Ghraib.

published in foreign media outlets, and leaking into our consciousness, before America becomes willing to ask collectively and forcefully, “What the hell have we been doing over there?”. Once that starts to happen, Hersh can publish, and only then do we have a chance to finally get to the bottom of this cesspool.

* * *

I wonder if FireMarshall Bucca’s family agrees to the use his name’s been put? Someone should interview them and see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 6:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/72 "2004-07-19T06:51:00Z")

</div>

Originally posted by **elucidator**

> [@](#):
>
> \*This story hit the German press more than a week ago.
> 
> & “Well, yeah, but the story has more or less “broke”, its been published overseas”.\*

What story do you mean? There’s nothing about Americans video-taping rape?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b4bc9f/32.png) [@RTA](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTA)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/73 "2004-07-19T12:39:38Z")

</div>

The cat’s out of the bag; all that’s left for us to see is the extent to which the story is suppressed in the US. My guess is quite a hell of an awful lot.

And who will be the celestial pundit who once again floats the idea that this is a result of the loose sexual mores of Bill Clinton? Limbaugh, Coulter, O’Reilly; the red-state nation looks to you to defend the indefensible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 12:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/74 "2004-07-19T12:43:48Z")

</div>

> [@RTA](#):
>
> The cat’s out of the bag; all that’s left for us to see is the extent to which the story is suppressed in the US. My guess is quite a hell of an awful lot.

Um, you guessed wrong. It actually broke in the US. Hersh has been telling this story since early May. Of course, the thread title is factually incorrect, and Hersh has so far offered no tangible evidence, but still.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avumede](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/avumede/32/7235_2.png) [@Avumede](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avumede)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/75 "2004-07-19T12:46:14Z")

</div>

> [@zuma](#):
>
> yeah, it’s fake.
> 
> all i had to see it [plastic.com](http://plastic.com). The site is run by a guy who is pretty much insane. He’s sane enough to keep his site up, i guess, but check out the history of the guy. he’s nuts.

You don’t know what you are talking about. Carl seems a bit eccentric, but certainly not insane. And he doesn’t put up this news, it’s a community driven site. The requirements for putting up stuff tend to be fairly strict, the site in fact usually sacrifices reporting speed for accuracy. not to mention all the supporting links in the story. So rest assured, it ain’t fake.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/76 "2004-07-19T13:18:44Z")

</div>

> [@Liberal](#):
>
> Um, you guessed wrong. It actually broke in the US. Hersh has been telling this story since early May. Of course, the thread title is factually incorrect, and Hersh has so far offered no tangible evidence, but still.

The thread title is correct in substance. There is no moral difference between doing the raping or doing the videotaping. If Americans watched and videotaped while chilren were being raped, then they were accsessories to the rape. Child pornographers are still child molesters.

I don’t know what you woul expect in the way of “tangible” evidence from a reporter. Hersh can’t post the videotapes himself but he he can report what he knows about them, directly or indirectly. It sounds to me, from his description of the children screaming on the soundtrack, like he’s seen them himself.

Officials in the Pentagon, WH and Senate have already conceded that the worse is yet to come and that the crimes at AG included rape. They also have not denied any of Hersh’s allegations about child rape, which is as good as a concession to me.

Ultimately, all a reporter really has is his reputation and you just have to decide whether a given reporter has any basic credibility. Sy Hersh does. He is very well respected and has no history of being wrong before, certainly not for inventing wild accusations out of whole cloth. I see no reason to insinuate that the man is lying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revtim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/revtim/32/1042_2.png) [@Revtim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revtim)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 1:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/77 "2004-07-19T13:36:03Z")

</div>

Is anybody else absolutely astonished that they would actually videotape this happening? What is the name of Christ was their goal in recording it for posterity? I’m personally glad they did, so the harshest punishments can be doled out, but what was _their_ reason to tape it? It wasn’t for ‘America’s Funniest Home Videos’, I assume.

Was it to have souvenirs from the war? After Gulf War 1 I saw a photo album a soldier made of all the corpses he saw and/or created. Was it kinda like that?

Or maybe it was to show to other prisoners, to demonstrate what their captors were capable of?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/78 "2004-07-19T15:03:20Z")

</div>

It might have had legitimate motives. Might have been “I’ll tape this, and when someone in authority sees this, heads will roll and this shit will stop.”

Were I there, standing a post, I would hope that I would bring my weapon to bear, and say something like “Get up off of that kid right now before I paint the wall with your baby-fucking brains.” I hope so, but I wasn’t, and I’m not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/79 "2004-07-19T15:07:31Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> The thread title is correct in substance. There is no moral difference between doing the raping or doing the videotaping. If Americans watched and videotaped while chilren were being raped, then they were accsessories to the rape. Child pornographers are still child molesters.
> 
> I don’t know what you woul expect in the way of “tangible” evidence from a reporter. Hersh can’t post the videotapes himself but he he can report what he knows about them, directly or indirectly. It sounds to me, from his description of the children screaming on the soundtrack, like he’s seen them himself.
> 
> Officials in the Pentagon, WH and Senate have already conceded that the worse is yet to come and that the crimes at AG included rape. They also have not denied any of Hersh’s allegations about child rape, which is as good as a concession to me.
> 
> Ultimately, all a reporter really has is his reputation and you just have to decide whether a given reporter has any basic credibility. Sy Hersh does. He is very well respected and has no history of being wrong before, certainly not for inventing wild accusations out of whole cloth. I see no reason to insinuate that the man is lying.

Upon reconsideration, I believe you’re right. Thanks for the excellent argument, Diogenes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2004, 3:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630/80 "2004-07-19T15:13:12Z")

</div>

> [@Liberal](#):
>
> Upon reconsideration, I believe you’re right. Thanks for the excellent argument, Diogenes.

You can take me now, Lord, I done seen it all, no more reason to stay.  
[Sanford] I’m coming, 'Lizabeth, I’m coming…[/Sanford]

Which is to say, backhanded kudos for **Lib** , conduct entirely becoming, above and beyond the call of the Pit…

Pip, pip. Good show, that.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/americans-condone-rape-of-iraqi-children/255630.md?page=5)
