There are likely as many views on Québec as there are Canadians who hold them. I assume from your question that you are referring to Québec’s place within Canadian conferderation, not ‘how do most Canadians feel about Québec maple syrup.’
For the most part, the sentiment in English Canada toward Québec is akin to a family member’s feeling about another family member who alternately expresses love and affection, or hate and desire to move out. There are a few idiots out there who cross there arms, stamp their feet and pout “if Kwee-bec wants to seperate, let’em go” without stopping to think about the ramifications on the rest of Canada of losing (i) a qurater of the population (ii) a third of the land mass (if you think our currency is weak NOW . . .).
I think that for the most part Canadians understand that the vast majority of Québecers want to live theiur lives and not be politicized at every turn, just as English Canadians do. It’s the vocal minority of what I call ‘professional seperatists’ who can’t get off their soapbox lonmg enough to see the damamge their rhetoric causes not only to the economy, but to the peace of mind of their population. Bear in mind also that these politicians and academics are correct in asserting that Québec got the short end of the stick for generations, that Québec sent more into federal coffers than it got back, and that the federal government was often ignorant as to the vagaries of life in La Belle Province. But that situation has been remedied over the past generation or so, with more going into Québec than coming out (in Canada all 10 provinces receive ‘equalization’ payments from the federal government based on things like population, unemployment etc. ie. the rich provinces like Ontario and Alberta pay money to the poorer provinces. Québec used to be one of the rich guys, now they’re one of the poor guys).
I liken the situaion to the equal rights movement in the USA. There are those who assert, rightly so, that minorities have not always been treated fairly in the USA. Hence ERA in the 60’s. Now, there are some opposnents to ERA who say the situation has been redressed, hence no more need for the ERA. Conversely, there are some (like the seperatists) who cannot forget the bad old days.
Finally, within Québec, it is only about 25% of the pouplation who actively advocate an actual sepration from Canada (secession if you like). Another 25% are less ‘seperatist’ and more ‘sovereignist’, asserting that Québec is a distict society within Canada and should therefore have greater control over its social laws, courts, education etc. The other half of the province voted in the 1995 referendum to stay in Canada and not to renegotiate the constitution to give the province more powers. So you’ve got seperatists, sovereignists, and federalists. The majority of Québecers, when in a ballot box, tend to root for the home team, but recognize the value of playing in a bigger league.