# Amy Coney Barret and Atheists?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [May 23, 2021, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720 "2021-05-23T03:42:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 8:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/21 "2021-05-23T08:59:37Z")

</div>

This thread needs some definitions. It’s like you’re all talking **at** each other instead of **to** each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 12:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/22 "2021-05-23T12:11:14Z")

</div>

I think rather than talking about Atheists, we should be looking at Irreligiousness in general. The Irreligious make up a significant and growing demographic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 12:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/23 "2021-05-23T12:35:33Z")

</div>

> [@Jim\_B](#):
>
> I am probably not the only person who wonders.

Yes, I think you are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a87d85/32.png) [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tired_and_Cranky)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/24 "2021-05-23T13:17:48Z")

</div>

Do you speak for any atheists? If so, on whose authority?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a87d85/32.png) [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tired_and_Cranky)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/25 "2021-05-23T13:21:37Z")

</div>

Others wonder too but because we are concerned about those bad outcomes instead of dismissing them out of hand or secretly favoring them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mozchron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mozchron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mozchron)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/26 "2021-05-23T13:28:28Z")

</div>

I have seen the argument posited that as atheism is not a religion (it’s the absence of religion), atheists do not enjoy first amendment protections for their beliefs. As an atheist that concerns me.

> **[Is Atheism Religion Under the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses? - National...](https://nationallegalfoundation.org/blog/is-atheism-religion-under-the-first-amendments-religion-clauses/)**
>
> "Religion" under the First Amendment does not include non-theistice worldviews like atheism and agnosticism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saje](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saje/32/3631_2.png) [@saje](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/saje)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/27 "2021-05-23T13:54:18Z")

</div>

I’m not sure I follow. In it’s broadest terms, it’s about freedom of speech and religion. If your freedom of speech is unaffected, and you don’t believe in a specific religion, how are you being affected? In the example you posted it talks about giving the invocation. I guess I don’t understand why a non-theist would want to speak words they don’t believe, invoking a power they know isn’t there.

I qualify as an atheist, but I don’t consider myself AN atheist - that sounds like being part a “religious” group of non-believers. I don’t like, trust, believe in religion over and above the thought of a supreme being.

I’d be happy the atheism is not considered a religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/28 "2021-05-23T14:03:26Z")

</div>

If atheism is not considered to be, let’s say, the equivalent of a religion for free exercise purposes–with fully equal rights and protections to religions–then something like [Section 4 of Article 1 of the Texas State Constitution](https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm) is not necessarily unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments:

> [@](#):
>
> Sec. 4. RELIGIOUS TESTS. No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

But non-theistic beliefs _are_ the equivalents of religions, for the purposes of free exercise jurisprudence, and so that clause of the Texas State Constitution (and similar clauses in the constitutions of several other states) are not enforceable (at least not _legally_ enforceable; politically or socially enforceable is another matter, there being no way to control what voters do in the privacy of the voting booth).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mozchron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mozchron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mozchron)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/29 "2021-05-23T14:32:57Z")

</div>

I can be affected if, for instance, I’m fired from a job for espousing atheistic beliefs, or fired for not espousing religious beliefs. Yes, currently the law seems to forbid this, but with nutters like Barret on the court I have no confidence the status quo will hold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/30 "2021-05-23T14:58:25Z")

</div>

> [@Great\_Antibob](#):
>
> …having fundamentalists (or near-fundamentalists) in charge of determining what is constitutional or not would be a major concern going forward.

I agree with you. And I’m no fan of Amy Coney Barret.

However, she is not a fundamentalist, or even a near-fundamentalist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobsmom101](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobsmom101/32/2867_2.png) [@bobsmom101](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobsmom101)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/31 "2021-05-23T15:35:09Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> than there are pro-life atheists.

May I make a suggestion that we stop calling the anti-abortion faction “pro-life?”

More descriptive terms would be “anti-abortion” or “anti-choice.” Calling them “pro-life” pretty much defines the opposing position exactly the way they would like. If these individuals were truly “pro-life” they would support other forms of birth control, wage parity for working women, subsidies for child care, and more support for poor single mothers. Unfortunately their platform is usually against all of these measures.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/32 "2021-05-23T15:48:46Z")

</div>

If atheism is a religion, then silence is a musical genre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/33 "2021-05-23T15:57:03Z")

</div>

Oh, crap-Now someone is going to link to that damn “John Cage’s 4’33”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Anconia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@D\_Anconia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Anconia)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/36 "2021-05-23T16:07:11Z")

</div>

You’re the fourth or fifth person to misspell the Justice’s name in this thread. Is it deliberate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icarus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icarus/32/72_2.png) [@Icarus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icarus)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/37 "2021-05-23T16:12:07Z")

</div>

Regarding abortion vis a vis atheism - I do not want any member of the scotus predicating their decisions on their personal religious belief. In this instance, the case may be about abortion, in the next it may be about access to birth control. This is a “camel’s nose in the tent” issue. Any scotus decision predicated on religious belief (yes, ANY) erodes the rights of atheists, and other out religions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/38 "2021-05-23T16:22:24Z")

</div>

> [@D\_Anconia](#):
>
> You’re the fourth or fifth person to misspell the Justice’s name in this thread. Is it deliberate? -

Maybe you should talk to the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/39 "2021-05-23T16:26:33Z")

</div>

No, it’s not. Thanks so much for pointing out my misspelling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/40 "2021-05-23T16:35:14Z")

</div>

In any case, who cares? It’s just an attempt to demonize and distract from the thread topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/41 "2021-05-23T16:38:02Z")

</div>

> [@bobsmom101](#):
>
> If these individuals were truly “pro-life” they would support other forms of birth control, wage parity for working women, subsidies for child care, and more support for poor single mothers.

We do exist, you know. I’ll grant you that there aren’t nearly enough of us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720/42 "2021-05-23T16:50:15Z")

</div>

But as has been pointed out, none of these things “make life harder” for atheists because of their atheism. They may affect, 1) people who desire abortions, 2) LGBTQ persons, and 3) people who don’t like the First Amendment as written, but they do not affect atheists by virtue of being an atheist. Where is the connection between atheism and these issues?

Sure, the local Elks Club might pass a resolution saying that they are pro-life, but if a bill is passed allowing third trimester abortions that doesn’t “make life harder” on the Elks Club.

All of the examples in this thread are substituting “liberal” for “atheist.”

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/amy-coney-barret-and-atheists/942720.md?page=3)
