Hey, if I’ve learned anything from cartoons it’s that anything going through a wall will leave a perfect outline of the person or object. Any suggestion that the impact could affect either other parts of the wall or any part of the perforating object are just crazy talk.
Or, y’know, psikeyhackr could look at Posts #812 and 813.
I’ll cut psik some slack here - I don’t think Gregg64 really saw pics of the vertical stabilizer, because the vertical stabilizer smashed into the Pentagon wall at 500 mph and was smashed to bits.
However, there are pics of the elongated holes for wings. Lute linked to one in post #813.
None of those pics show anything conclusive, and wouldn’t the port wing have done some damage to the ground? Pretty convenient that the entire plane turned to “dust”.
The port side wing didn’t hit the ground, it hit across the first floor face. The port engine apparently clipped a concrete vent retaining wall just before hitting the building.
That’s because they knew that they’d have to bring down the WTC 64 years later and no-one was going to believe that a blimp could knock over a skyscraper. Therefore, they had to kill off the zeppelin industry so it could be replaced by airplanes, which they did by using aluminum (which of course is an ingredient of thermite) to blow up the Hindenburg. It’s so simple!