# An historian or a historian?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 22, 2005, 5:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049 "2005-01-22T05:34:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LavenderBlue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e95f7d/32.png) [@LavenderBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LavenderBlue)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 5:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/1 "2005-01-22T05:34:17Z")

</div>

Which one is correct?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![friedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8edcca/32.png) [@friedo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/friedo)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 5:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/2 "2005-01-22T05:39:52Z")

</div>

That depends on how you pronounce “historian.” If you’re American, you probably say it with a strong consonant “H,” in which case “a historian” is correct. Many Brits say it with a much softer “H” or none at all, making it basically a vowel, in which case “an historian” is correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 5:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/3 "2005-01-22T05:40:04Z")

</div>

As one of the people who used it in Eve’s Pit thread, **an** historian. The H is silent. Parvenu! :rolleyes:

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 5:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/4 "2005-01-22T05:40:58Z")

</div>

> [@lavenderlemon](#):
>
> Which one is correct?

An is used in front of “h” words when th H isn’t sounded.

I’ll be there in an hour  
I’ll be happy to finally have a home.

Historian is sort of an inbetween case; the h is sounded just a bit. I’ve certainly see it both ways and either sounds OK to me. OTOH I’d never say an history book. Note that the accent in history is on the first syllable, but the accent in historian is on the second syllable which makes the sounding of the h much less pronounced. (pun intended).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![coop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/87869e/32.png) [@coop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/coop)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 6:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/5 "2005-01-22T06:47:40Z")

</div>

An Hotel.  
A House.  
A Hovercraft.  
An Hors d’oeuvre.

🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hemlock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c5a1d2/32.png) [@Hemlock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hemlock)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/6 "2005-01-22T07:39:04Z")

</div>

Well, if you’re a cockney it’s  
an 'istorian  
an 'ouse  
an ''overcraft  
an 'ors d’oeuvre

…innit?

From what I’ve seen, a silent ‘h’ in historian or hotel sounds outdated or pretentious among standard Brit English speakers.

Probablt part of the tendancy in recent decades among many people to be self-conscious and even hypercorrect about pronunciation. Hence the ‘h’ n forehead is usually sounded now, as is the ‘t’ in often. Similarly, a lot of people now pronounce tourquoise a la francaise (tourqwazz) rather than tourqwoiz as God, being English, intended.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 7:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/7 "2005-01-22T07:53:43Z")

</div>

> [@Hemlock](#):
>
> Similarly, a lot of people now pronounce tourquoise a la francaise (tourqwazz) rather than tourqwoiz as God, being English, intended.

I’ve never heard that one - and I think I’d punch anybody who said it that way 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![coop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/87869e/32.png) [@coop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/coop)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2005, 11:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/an-historian-or-a-historian/286049/8 "2005-01-22T11:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@Hemlock](#):
>
> Well, if you’re a cockney it’s  
> an 'istorian  
> an 'ouse  
> an ''overcraft  
> an 'ors d’oeuvre
> 
> …innit?
> 
> From what I’ve seen, a silent ‘h’ in historian or hotel sounds outdated or pretentious among standard Brit English speakers.
> 
> blah blah blah…

I have heard, more often (silent “T”) than not, especially on the news, “An Hotel,” more than “A Hotel.”  
To me, the first is the more correct pronunciation 🙂

Going along with your argument, I suppose you think we should pronounce the “L” in film - fillum?

And I’m not a cockney… Aussie, through and through 🆒
