# ancient army logistics

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 9, 2005, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604 "2005-06-09T16:20:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2005, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/21 "2005-06-12T03:20:53Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Ah, I didn’t ask if he was the first to _discover_ logistics, I asked if he was the first to _master_ logistics.

I wouldn’t say so. The term comes from Latin ( Roman _logista_ = quartermaster ) by way of Greek and I’d probably give pride of place to the Romans for being the first real _masters_ of logistics ( if such a thing is possible in any but the most relative of senses in terms of time period ), if only because of their excellent infrastructure. Diocletian in particular through necessity turned the Roman empire into, to quote Edward Luttwak, ‘one vast logistic base’. Though there were certainly innovators before them, Philip of Macedon not least of them. It should also be mentioned that the ( roughly contemporary to the Roman principate ) Han empire in China was no slouch as well.

- Tamerlane

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2005, 3:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/22 "2005-06-12T03:54:48Z")

</div>

The other thing to bear in mind is that warfare in ages past was SLOW. Well, it was slow as compared to today. It should be pretty obvious that the difficulty of logistics is directly proportional not only to the size of the army in question and their provisional needs, but also the rate at which they moved.

Armies in times past simply didn’t move very fast.

It’s interesting, though, that as plnnr points out, the armies of the Civil War would still steal anything they could get their hands on. These were armies that, especially on the Union side, had railroads and very large and advanced networks of riverboats and ocean-going ships to supply them. And they’d still take your food.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2005, 5:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/23 "2005-06-12T05:01:12Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Armies in times past simply didn’t move very fast.

Good point.

As Luttwak points out ( and I hope everyone has read his The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire:\* From the First Century A.D. to the Third\* - if you haven’t, you should ) that the occasional criticisms of the Roman policy of the early to mid-principate of not maintaining a significant permanent strategic reserve of troops in the center, as opposed to spreading them out in a great circle near the borders, are silly. At the stately pace of 3 mph, any central reserve of heavy infantry were almost functionally immobile considering the distances involved and therefore virtually useless.

- Tamerlane

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimpy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c68b51/32.png) [@Jimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimpy)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2005, 10:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/24 "2005-06-12T10:07:37Z")

</div>

> [@plnnr](#):
>
> I think you’d have to county 1861-1865 as “modern times” in many ways, and it was VERY common for armies on both sides of the Civil War to simply take whatever they wanted or needed when on the move. My mother grew up living beside a woman who was a child during the Civil War and remembers that both sides pretty much left the family with no hogs, no corn, and no firewood. Virginia was pretty much decimated during the war, so much so that people left in droves and it is only within the last 50 years that the population has rebounded. There were more people living in my home county in 1750 than there were in 1950.

In The Civil War, the South stretched itself to thin and Grant discovered that once he got passed the main lines there were few, if any, reserve troops in the rear. Grant, in particular, sent troops into the Confederate rear to cut supply lines. These units, generally only 1000-2000 strong, if that, were quite effective at times.

There is an old saying “An army travels on it’s stomach.” At times, the rebel army had no choice but to scrounge around for any food it could get. Even the Union army had to raid the local farms, they either outran the supply lines or didn’t have enough to begin with (or, for that matter, wanted fresher rations.)

And if you think those days are gone, you may be mistaken. I don’t know of any recent case of a modern army running out of food, but in the First Gulf War, Fred Franks and his group almost outran their fuel trucks. Walt Boomer (I think, I’m doing this from memory) and the marines anticipate this problem and put their supply depots \*\*in front of \*\* the main lines before the attack. Food, fuel and amunition, all of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tranquilis](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tranquilis/32/3639_2.png) [@Tranquilis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tranquilis)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2005, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/25 "2005-06-13T15:01:46Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Ah, I didn’t ask if he was the first to _discover_ logistics, I asked if he was the first to _master_ logistics.

Which is why I incleded the words “practical” and “organized.” Those qualities are what’s required to master logistics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jet\_Jaguar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jet_jaguar/32/3562_2.png) [@Jet\_Jaguar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jet_Jaguar)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2005, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604/26 "2005-06-13T15:26:08Z")

</div>

Another book you may want to look at is Sun Tsu’s “Art of War”. Along with strategic advice, there’s a little information on budgeting and maintaining a Chinese army circa 500 BC or so.

There’s also the classic Chinese historical novel “Romance of the Three Kingdoms” about the civil war that ensued during the Three Kingdoms era (~180 to 260 AD, IIRC). It goes into great detail about the waging of war and logistics, though it’s a huge read. In addition to requisitioning food from towns and foraging off the land, the Chinese also maintained military farms purely for the purpose of feeding hundreds of thousands of troops at a time.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ancient-army-logistics/307604.md?page=1)
