Animals which we couldn't live without

so humans put out the occasional huge wildfire that might wipe out a species or 2 every couple thousand years is your argument that humans are some how good for the planet?

what about the fires set to burn in the south American rain forests to clear land for farming that will only produce crops for a few seasons before they burn more forrest for more next to useless farmland rinse and repeat? even conservative estimates would guess at hundreds of extinctions each year due to this. and the extinction rate prior to humans altering the planet for their needs was something around 1 per 1000 years, now its (or it was) close to 1 per day?

sorry for the hi-jack.
I dont think any single animal would have a huge holy crap we are all gonna die effect but there are quite a few that would have some significant impacts.

But at least we’d still have Phish.

Thanks for fighting the ignorance.

Somebody needs to write a letter to National Geographic and straighten them out. I thought it sounded fishy. The article describes the huge drifts of leaves that supposedly blew around North American forests until European worms arrived to turn them into mulch. :dubious:

Then again, there was a lot about that article (about the Jamestown colony) that was suspect.

Here’s how National Geographic describes the worm situation:

So their language is more circumspect than I remembered, describing only the northern forests as being worm-free, before the dastardly Europeans arrived and callously inflicted their worms on the place.

(Sorry; that last bit was a venting of my aggravation at the “noble savage” vibe of the rest of the article.)

Well the dinosaurs went extinct and the cavemen managed to survive, FWIW.