# Another Bobbies with guns question

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 20, 2007, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371 "2007-10-20T03:58:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/1 "2007-10-20T03:58:41Z")

</div>

I know that most British police officers do not carry guns. I recently saw a BBC show (it was Torchwood, not a show I watch for accuracy) in which a British police officer is shown to have absolutely no knowledge of how to handle a firearm. Is this accurate? It seems ridiculous to not at least train new officers in use and safe handling of firearms, at least to a level of familiarization.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/2 "2007-10-20T05:14:08Z")

</div>

Torchwood (AFAIK) is not a documentary, but it gets this detail correct. Unless a British Poilce Officer is attatched to a specialised unit, they will never have to use a firearm and so there is simply no need to have firearms training.

Do American police have training for assault rifles and RPGs?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 5:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/3 "2007-10-20T05:16:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Tapioca Dextrin]  
Torchwood (AFAIK) is not a documentary, but it gets this detail correct. Unless a British Poilce Officer is attatched to a specialised unit, they will never have to use a firearm and so there is simply no need to have firearms training.

Do American police have training for assault rifles and RPGs?  
[/QUOTE]

Sometimes and no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chowder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/977dab/32.png) [@chowder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chowder)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 7:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/4 "2007-10-20T07:53:46Z")

</div>

I may be wrong on this but I always understood that most, if not all UK police stations, kept a certain number of firearms and that some of the officers attached to that particular station were trained in the use of them.

Torchwood incidentally is an anagram of Doctor Who

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chez\_Guevara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/aeb1de/32.png) [@Chez\_Guevara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chez_Guevara)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/5 "2007-10-20T11:45:07Z")

</div>

A few broad statistics from the Police Federation, albeit two years old.

> [@](#):
>
> 'That said, gun crime is going up and the number of authorised firearms officers has gone down. Whereas the Metropolitan Police has around 10 per cent of its force authorised to use firearms, on average the national figure is less than 5 per cent.
> 
> ‘There’s a recognition we need to have greater resilience. The people who are authorised firearms officers are having more and more demands placed on them. I would like to see us moving towards the 10 per cent rather than sticking with the 5 per cent figure.’ That would mean having about 14,000 trained firearms officers nationally.
> 
> A decade ago, there were 6,837 trained firearms officers in England and Wales but by last year that had fallen to 6,096. Yet official statistics show gun crime has risen for the last five years: firearms incidents increased by six per cent in the past year alone.

There seems to be a lack of volunteers within the police force for firearms training because of the stress involved in so doing.

Source: [The Observer](http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1646782,00.html) 20 November 2005.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 3:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/6 "2007-10-20T15:40:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Loach]  
I know that most British police officers do not carry guns. I recently saw a BBC show (it was Torchwood, not a show I watch for accuracy) in which a British police officer is shown to have absolutely no knowledge of how to handle a firearm. Is this accurate? It seems ridiculous to not at least train new officers in use and safe handling of firearms, at least to a level of familiarization.  
[/QUOTE]

Why would British police need firearms training?  
The prevailing mood here is anti-gun, especially after [Dunblane](http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/dunblane.html) and [Hungerford](http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/19/newsid_2534000/2534669.stm).

I appreciate that the US has the ‘right to bear arms’ clause, a history of massive gun ownership and the NRA lobbying - but we have none of that.

The public here are not allowed handguns.  
You can only get a shotgun licence if e.g. you are a farmer shooting vermin.

From the Metropolitan Police (they patrol London) site:

CO19 is the branch name given to the Specialist Firearm Command branch of the Metropolitan Police Service that provides firearms-related support to our unarmed colleagues. The branch is comprised of a small number of officers who are highly trained and motivated in dealing with all aspects of the criminal use of firearms. Operationally, our branch is here to provide armed support to allow the vast majority of policing activities throughout London to be conducted in the traditional manner by unarmed officers.

[http://www.met.police.uk/co19/](http://www.met.police.uk/co19/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/7 "2007-10-20T16:18:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=glee]  
Why would British police need firearms training?  
[/QUOTE]

Surely we need some police officers who can handle guns, for those occasions when they’re dealing with some nutter(s) who might kill other people?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ticker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/d07c76/32.png) [@ticker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ticker)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/8 "2007-10-20T16:32:09Z")

</div>

I would have thought it wise that **all** coppers were trained to at least handle and make safe a loaded firearm without accidental discharge. It would be a shame if they shot themselves in the foot with a confiscated gun. Somehow I doubt most poses these skills however.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/9 "2007-10-20T16:37:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=glee]  
Why would British police need firearms training?  
The prevailing mood here is anti-gun, especially after [Dunblane](http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/dunblane.html) and [Hungerford](http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/19/newsid_2534000/2534669.stm).

I appreciate that the US has the ‘right to bear arms’ clause, a history of massive gun ownership and the NRA lobbying - but we have none of that.

The public here are not allowed handguns.  
You can only get a shotgun licence if e.g. you are a farmer shooting vermin.

From the Metropolitan Police (they patrol London) site:

CO19 is the branch name given to the Specialist Firearm Command branch of the Metropolitan Police Service that provides firearms-related support to our unarmed colleagues. The branch is comprised of a small number of officers who are highly trained and motivated in dealing with all aspects of the criminal use of firearms. Operationally, our branch is here to provide armed support to allow the vast majority of policing activities throughout London to be conducted in the traditional manner by unarmed officers.

[http://www.met.police.uk/co19/](http://www.met.police.uk/co19/)  
[/QUOTE]

Just because guns are illegal in UK doesn’t mean that criminals won’t have them (that’s why they are criminals–they break the law :smack: )

As such, the police need to be trained in firearm use to protect themselves and the public (which has been disarmed) from these criminals..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/10 "2007-10-20T17:01:08Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=ticker]  
I would have thought it wise that **all** coppers were trained to at least handle and make safe a loaded firearm without accidental discharge. It would be a shame if they shot themselves in the foot with a confiscated gun. Somehow I doubt most poses these skills however.  
[/QUOTE]

That is really what I was thinking. Guns exist. They even exist in GB. It is at least a possibility that you could come in contact with a firearm during your career. I’m sure Bobbies go through months of training before they are put on the street. Wouldn’t it make sense to take them to the range for one day during that time so they can become familiar with the safe operation of the weapons?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wendigo1974](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c37758/32.png) [@wendigo1974](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wendigo1974)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 6:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/11 "2007-10-20T18:09:25Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Loach]  
That is really what I was thinking. Guns exist. They even exist in GB. It is at least a possibility that you could come in contact with a firearm during your career. I’m sure Bobbies go through months of training before they are put on the street. Wouldn’t it make sense to take them to the range for one day during that time so they can become familiar with the safe operation of the weapons?  
[/QUOTE]

There are a lot of different weapons which operate in alot of different ways out there.  
In the UK as all handguns are illegal the criminals have to make do with what they can get there hands on. Which means alot of esoteric or re-activated weapons also get used.  
As it is trained officers occasionally have accidents with their service issue weapons whilst unloading. What are the chances of a beat bobby making a MAC 10 safe he’s just pulled from a Mancunian wideboy’s waistband.  
Better off handing it over the ARV as their “supposed” to know how to handle it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/12 "2007-10-20T18:17:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=wendigo1974]  
Better off handing it over the ARV as their “supposed” to know how to handle it.  
[/QUOTE]

No it is not. It is better to make it safe immediately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/13 "2007-10-20T18:24:09Z")

</div>

Sorry hit submit too soon and couldn’t edit.

It’s not rocket science. It doesn’t take a long training period to became familiar with firearms. You don’t have to hold every gun ever made to figure out how to handle them. I recently had to help confiscate over 50 weapons from someone. Most were antiques. I was never trained on how to handle double barrel black powder muskets. I am familiar enough with weapons to be able to figure it out. This attitude with actual police officers who treat weapons like they are radioactive is ridiculous. One day at the range would be all that is needed to familiarize them with the operation of firearms. “This is a pistol. The bullets go in here and come out there.” Maybe they would never need to use the training. Like every other aspect of the job I would rather be trained in something and never use it than not have the training when I do need it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malacandra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Malacandra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malacandra)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/14 "2007-10-20T18:38:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=chowder]  
Torchwood incidentally is an anagram of Doctor Who  
[/QUOTE]

Hit, son. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLoadedDog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/35a633/32.png) [@TheLoadedDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheLoadedDog)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/15 "2007-10-20T22:13:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Malacandra]  
Hit, son. 😉  
[/QUOTE]

Ongar.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/16 "2007-10-20T23:33:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Usram]  
Surely we need some police officers who can handle guns, for those occasions when they’re dealing with some nutter(s) who might kill other people?  
[/QUOTE]

Sorry, I meant most British police. As per my cite, there are specialist firearms units.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/17 "2007-10-20T23:37:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=jtgain]  
Just because guns are illegal in UK doesn’t mean that criminals won’t have them (that’s why they are criminals–they break the law :smack: )

As such, the police need to be trained in firearm use to protect themselves and the public (which has been disarmed) from these criminals..  
[/QUOTE]

Just because a member of the public has a gun licence doesn’t mean it won’t be used to kill illegally. That’s why they have guns - to shoot them. :smack:

As such, a country will be far safer if guns are banned. (The UK has far fewer gun deaths than the US.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/18 "2007-10-20T23:48:30Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Loach]  
That is really what I was thinking. Guns exist. They even exist in GB. It is at least a possibility that you could come in contact with a firearm during your career. I’m sure Bobbies go through months of training before they are put on the street. Wouldn’t it make sense to take them to the range for one day during that time so they can become familiar with the safe operation of the weapons?  
[/QUOTE]

I suppose (as Ticker already said) it might be useful for a policeman to learn how to make a gun safe.  
In case they ever confiscate one.  
You could also argue for police learning how to deal with hand grenades, biological and chemical weapons.

However you should realise just how few guns there are in the UK. We had two gun massacres in 1987 and 1996. So we banned handguns completely then (they were already pretty rare).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2007, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/19 "2007-10-20T23:49:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=glee]  
Just because a member of the public has a gun licence doesn’t mean it won’t be used to kill illegally. That’s why they have guns - to shoot them. :smack:

As such, a country will be far safer if guns are banned. (The UK has far fewer gun deaths than the US.)  
[/QUOTE]

Did you read that right? The quote mentioned criminals with guns because they are criminals. It then said _police_ should be trained in the use of firearms to protect the public. No mention of giving the public licenses or removing the gun ban in England.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2007, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371/20 "2007-10-21T02:44:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=glee]  
Just because a member of the public has a gun licence doesn’t mean it won’t be used to kill illegally. That’s why they have guns - to shoot them. :smack:

As such, a country will be far safer if guns are banned. (The UK has far fewer gun deaths than the US.)  
[/QUOTE]

Pro/anti gun is a discussion for another thread as I don’t wish to hijack this one. I’m not sure what you mean by a “gun licence”. I own several guns, but have no license, as one is not required to own a gun, or even carry a gun in your car’s glove box in the state of Florida.

If I want to conceal the pistol on my person, in public, then I need to get a concealed weapons permit, which costs about $100, a background check, and is must-issue if I am not a criminal. Is this the “gun licence” you mean?

Anyways, just because the UK bans citizens from owning firearms, you understand that the criminal element disregards such laws? I’m sure the UK has laws against bank robbery, but need a police force to stop/investigate those crimes.

Since a criminal in possession of an illegal firearm could be a serious threat to the officer or the public in general, why shouldn’t the police be trained in the use of firearms should that unfortunate event happen?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-bobbies-with-guns-question/423371.md?page=2)
