# Another fucking scandal?! WTF?!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 6, 2013, 2:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289 "2013-06-06T14:21:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/121 "2013-06-12T18:52:32Z")

</div>

I cannot imagine a more boring endeavor than researching Mr. Romney’s phone records. It would be like eating a five gallon jar of mayonnaise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/122 "2013-06-12T19:29:44Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> This seems to boil down to, “I trust the phone company (and all it’s employees) not to break the law.” Good for you. An endearing, if somewhat dewey-eyed, quality.

Not quite. But I do trust them not to give a shit, as long as the bill gets paid.

> [@](#):
>
> Do you think that someone didn’t go through Mitt Romney’s phone records looking for just those kinds of things? Really? They illegally snooped on his IRS file but left his phone records alone, did they?

“They”? Who is “they”? Your middle-school composition teacher didn’t beat that out of you, unlike most of us, apparently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/123 "2013-06-12T21:54:34Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> …They illegally snooped on his IRS file but left his phone records alone, did they?..

Perhaps it seems to you that this is so entirely obvious and accepted fact it need not be cited. Humor us, and do it anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/124 "2013-06-12T23:06:46Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Perhaps it seems to you that this is so entirely obvious and accepted fact it need not be cited. Humor us, and do it anyway.

What claim do you imagine I’m making that should be cited?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/125 "2013-06-12T23:38:08Z")

</div>

From your post, you seem to believe that someone was directed by their employer or other authority figure to comb through Mr. Romney’s phone records looking for certain info.

Do you believe that? And can you tell us why, with cites showing the information you discovered or found that led you to this belief?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2013, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/126 "2013-06-13T00:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> What claim do you imagine I’m making that should be cited?

I love it when you bat the big, brown, innocent eyes. What **SnowBo** said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2013, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/127 "2013-06-13T19:47:40Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> From your post, you seem to believe that someone was directed by their employer or other authority figure to comb through Mr. Romney’s phone records looking for certain info.
> 
> Do you believe that? And can you tell us why, with cites showing the information you discovered or found that led you to this belief?

I do believe that.

But the reason for my belief is indirect inference, not direct evidence.

I imagine you’re just as aware of the reasons as I am.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![digs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/digs/32/14889_2.png) [@digs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/digs)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2013, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/128 "2013-06-13T19:56:59Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> But the reason for my belief is indirect inference, not direct evidence…

What have you done with the real _ **Bricker**?_

And, how much do we have to cough up to get him released? Oh, and is it cheaper to just get him untied? (you can leave the duct tape on…)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2013, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/129 "2013-06-13T20:26:17Z")

</div>

I’m sorry, had I known it was a matter of solid and irrefutable indirect inference, I never would have asked for a cite. My bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2013, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/130 "2013-06-13T21:24:49Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I do believe that.
> 
> But the reason for my belief is indirect inference, not direct evidence.
> 
> I imagine you’re just as aware of the reasons as I am.

Clearly you imagine a lot of things.

Since you offer no reasons for your imaginings, I’ll just assume that they have the same basis in fact as your imagining about me: none.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerald\_II](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Gerald\_II](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gerald_II)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2013, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/131 "2013-07-30T07:39:20Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> What, for protesting, or for their particular aims?

For protesting something that the critics support, and simplifying the argument. “Support our troops,” as if criticizing the Iraq Invasion meant people wanted harm to come to our soldiers. And then there’s “Paying taxes is patriotic,” which doesn’t tackle the issue of government spending. It was an argument by a member of Congress I believe, who said we shouldn’t have gone to war if we couldn’t pay for it. Then there’s the issue of bailing out the banks, etc. Both groups had good criticisms which should have been addressed, along with looking at their aims, as you said, with a critical eye as well. But painting them into un-patriotic Americans is counterproductive to any thoughtful discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2013, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/132 "2013-07-30T15:48:14Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Because I voluntarily send the same information that the government is gathering to any number of private entities, and so I know it’s not private.
> 
> When I dial a number, the phone company(ies) involved have to know, and record, the number I’m calling from and the number I call. That’s a record. It exists. For what possible reason should my panties get in a twist because some other entity also copies that record?
> 
> If I want to communicate privately, I’ll do so. But it won’t be by phone.

Because the phone company can’t put you in jail. The phone company can’t get the FBI to crawl up your ass with a microscope. The phone company can’t write legislation that.

Comparing the power [to affect your life] between the phone company and the freakin’ Government, and judging it to “be the same” is incorrect.

Nobody’s worried if a corrupt phone company might infringe on your first amendment right. How many battalions does AT&T got?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerald\_II](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Gerald\_II](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gerald_II)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2013, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/133 "2013-07-31T21:32:13Z")

</div>

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> I think the evidence in this thread contradicts the latter assertion. It was just as stupid here as when **Bricker** asserted it

I had to look through the thread again and it doesn’t look like it quite contradicts my assertion. So far I’ve heard excuses, finger pointing and rationalizations by left leaning media personalities, Democrat supporters and even posters at this forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2013, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/134 "2013-07-31T21:38:24Z")

</div>

> [@Gerald\_II](#):
>
> I had to look through the thread again and it doesn’t look like it quite contradicts my assertion. So far I’ve heard excuses, finger pointing and rationalizations by left leaning media personalities, Democrat supporters and even posters at this forum.

Well, if facts, evidence and common sense isn’t what it takes to convince you, what _will_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerald\_II](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Gerald\_II](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gerald_II)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2013, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/135 "2013-07-31T23:26:29Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Well, if facts, evidence and common sense isn’t what it takes to convince you, what _will_?

Facts and evidence that disprove the claims in my earlier post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerald\_II](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Gerald\_II](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gerald_II)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2013, 8:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289/136 "2013-08-01T08:13:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Gerald II]

I had to look through the thread again and it doesn’t look like it quite contradicts my assertion. So far I’ve heard excuses, finger pointing and rationalizations by left leaning media personalities, Democrat supporters and even posters at this forum.  
Well, if facts, evidence and common sense isn’t what it takes to convince you, what will?  
[/QUOTE]

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Well, if facts, evidence and common sense isn’t what it takes to convince you, what _will_?

_Previously_

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> While I’m disgusted by the practice, I didn’t think this was a new issue. I thought it was established practice under Bush, and that Obama had sadly made clear he was not going to do anything to change it. Is there something novel about this particular instance?

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> This is old news that is only being called a “scandal” now because it’s got Obama’s name attached to it.

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> So, he’s doing the same thing his predecessor did, while never claiming he would stop the practice. Wow, let’s have a look at my shocked face. :rolleyes:

> [@babygoat666](#):
>
> The PATRIOT Act was signed on October 26, 2001. What a peculiar time to get upset over it.

[Ed Schultz pretty much saying it’s different when Obama does it](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhWrYY0xiB0)

[Former candidate, now President, Barack Obama on warrantless wiretapping](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rdi_RNRpdk)

Not to mention MSNBC personalities like Mika Brzezinski and Lawrence O’Donnell also subtly defending the NSA program by arguing that it’s legal and then focusing on the character of Edward Snowden and trying to discredit him.

It’s VERY important to bring up how these problems got started in the first place because so many people have short term memories, and it’s important to see how things got so far and where they started. However, why focus on one side being hypocritical. If they suddenly changed their minds just because a Democrat took office, well good for those against the spying of all American citizens. Then it should make it easier for change.

Although I saw the writing on the wall when Obama granted the telecom companies immunity for breaking the law and spying on citizens, unlike Kimstu, I DIDN’T vote for him based on that issue along with a couple others. I don’t regret it either considering his signing off on NDAA, and now the revelations of the further expansion of the surveillance state, continued by the current President.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-fucking-scandal-wtf/660289.md?page=6)
