OK, established regular time and place, that is a feeding center. Thanks for the clarification; I was going by the earlier article that described him being arrested in different public sites on different occasions. But this now clearly sounds like a scheduled deal that would, indeed, encourage hungry folks to congregate there. (Not that I think that is necessarily a problem, but it is a somewhat different thing.)
Contrast Mayor Seiler’s quote in the last article with the one from the top of the thread, though. “We hope he feeds. He has a very valuable role in the community,” versus “providing them with a meal and keeping them in that cycle on the street is not productive.”
I assume the Salvation Army tries to genuinely help people, sure. To the extent that a ticket-out program is offered, without compulsion, to people who actually have somewhere meaningful to go, who could really object? But if a city is simultaneously working to make the lives of all its local homeless people harder, I don’t think we should presume good intentions at all, nor say there is no compulsion at work.
That’s sufficiently vague as to not be able to respond. If you want to either presume nefarious intent or not presume good intentions, go right ahead. I’m sure you have evidence.
It seems to me like the Mayor wants more people to be funneled into agencies that promote longer-term solutions. Feeding people in the park gets them through one day. Getting them into an agency that could find different alternatives, more resources and more information can get them a lifetime of help.
In order to find that help, people have to know that the resources exist and how to find them. If this guy can help the homeless find resources, that’s great. But it sounds like he spends his entire day getting the food and feeding it to people. The people then eat the food and sleep in the park. It would be more productive to find them other resources.
There are agencies that can provide food and temporary housing as well as give information and provide resources for longer-term solutions. Broward County has an agency like that.
I disagree. In Fort Lauderdale, many people are homeless because they’re getting released from jail there. They were transported from their homes to the jail by the police. It’s possible that some of them now can’t afford to get back to their home. If they could get back to their home or family, they might not be homeless somewhere else.
Hey, I just realized I used to work right next to the park where those folks were arrested. Damn, I guess it’s been about ten years.
A little bit south of there is a satellite campus of FAU, and some scum teenagers beat a homeless person to death there. I don’t think they were FAU students.
It took more than a year of organizing. 15,000 people signed a Change.org petition demanding that Gainesville feed all who are hungry. Dozens of local demonstrations were held, many organized by local college students and the Coalition to End the Meal Limits NOW. Change.org members even phone-banked the City Commission, demanding to know when a vote would be scheduled.
And finally, on August 18th, the City Commission voted unanimously to end the limit.
Instead, soup kitchens will be allowed to serve food for a 3-hour period each day, a compromise suggested by Kent Vann, Executive Director of the St. Francis House soup kitchen, which was at the center of this debate. The city attorney’s office will now have to draft a new ordinance and the commission will have to approve it. At long last, Gainesville can move past the ill-conceived meal limit.