Another true UK police program Americans will be aghast at and Brits will find funny

I thought that the new number for 999 was 0118 999 881 999 119 725 3.

Even more importantly I should be getting paid in pounds. Those bastards.

Obama has not gone public with the deal yet, but in fact his solution to the fiscal cliff was to sell the USA to the UK using an executive order. You are actually working in Britain now.

We had a problem with that. Back when no one was certain where the Manitoba-Ontario border was, both provinces established police departments in Kenora, who instead of working together got it in their heads to arrest each other, resulting in most officers of both forces either being locked up in jail or hiding out in hopes of not being arrested. Unfortunately, this left the town without any effective law enforcement despite having two police forces. Also, you’ve heard of the expression “vote early and vote often” – well when it came time for the provincial elections, everyone got to vote twice, due to their residing in two provinces at one time.

I was going to say that you were joking, but there’s no way you could make up something so ridiculous and silly. So I believe you.

I know right! Fucking retarded Americans and their stupid guns. Why can’t they be more civilized like the UK which has no gun crime.

Out of the 11,227 firearms related crimes committed in England and Wales in 2010 and 2011: 4,203 were committed with airsoft-type weapons, and 1,610 were committed with imitation firearms. Link.

Christ, won’t someone think of the children?

Read page 25-27 about the Rat Portage Waron the pdf paper found at the TBLA website:

While you’re there, have a boo at pages 21-22 that deal with the summary execution of American Land Piratesdown near Detroit. Come to think of it, Detroit is where we are presently trying to give the Americans a free new bridge (report in Americanand in Canadian after the break at about six minutes in – and yes, that really is the Canadian Consul General in Detroit).

But Ravenman, you’re cite uses more recent data that shows a significant decrease since the peak in 2004, whereas Drunky Smurf’s cite uses dated data to show the increase but not the more recent decrease. Shouldn’t we use the more traditional, well established data rather than something that is more accurate?

From page page 56 of your link to the Home Office report:

TLDR. Doesn’t sound like you’re thinking about the children!