# Another "where did the terminator thread go" thread?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [September 2, 2012, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452 "2012-09-02T16:56:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astral\_Rejection](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/258eb7/32.png) [@Astral\_Rejection](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astral_Rejection)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/1 "2012-09-02T16:56:29Z")

</div>

I was gonna ask this question there, but with the thread locked, I couldn’t. Why do we disappear a sock’s threads if the thread in question is promoting discussion, AND the questions posed by the sock are non-inflammatory in nature?

It seems to me to be a huge overreaction; an actual “nuke the poster from orbit” response, if you will. 😃

It just seems like we’re terrified at the thought that a sock could be giggling away in his mom’s basement / posh hotel / Nigerian Internet cafe / whatever other stereotype we can think of, and I guess I’m of the opinion that it really, in the greater scheme of things, doesn’t matter. Let 'em laugh, I’ll never know the difference. I guess the easy response to this is that attention is what they want, but again: it’s a meaningless amount of attention, and once they’re banned / do whatever they socked up to do, they got what they wanted. Why kill innocuous threads afterwards?

Please note this is not intended as a criticism. I’m a huge fan of the boards, and I’ve got no skin in the game when it comes to running this place, so it’s easy for me to toss out questions like this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![twickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ec9cab/32.png) [@twickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/twickster)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/2 "2012-09-02T17:25:04Z")

</div>

If a sock starts a topic you’d like to see discussed, and the thread disappears, feel free to start a new thread on the same topic.

Easy peasy.

Also – we don’t necessarily dele all a troll’s threads – it depends on what the threads are, how much activity there is in them aside from the OP, etc. I recently banned someone for trolling, but only closed about half of the threads s/he had started because the others had healthy conversations going on that there was no reason to cut short.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/3 "2012-09-02T18:52:23Z")

</div>

It’s intended as a deterrent. If a sock sees all his posts disappeared, he may decide it’s not worth it to create a new sock. We don’t have all that many multiple returnees. In this particular case, the sock also had a semi-obscene trollish username.

As **twickster** says, if you find the topic of a disappeared thread interesting, you are free to start a new one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Irishman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b487fb/32.png) [@Irishman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Irishman)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/4 "2012-09-02T20:05:04Z")

</div>

The only problem with starting a new thread is, theoretically, there were a number of comments that were made that are now gone, and so the new thread won’t have those comments. Perhaps the people will return and remake them, perhaps not.

I say theoretically, because given the number of times we have “-gry” threads or “whole nine yards” threads resurface with exactly the same arguments repeated, I get the feeling it shouldn’t be too hard for good comments to show back up. YMMV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astral\_Rejection](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/258eb7/32.png) [@Astral\_Rejection](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astral_Rejection)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/5 "2012-09-02T22:35:54Z")

</div>

Fair enough. Thanks for responding!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2012, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/6 "2012-09-03T02:42:40Z")

</div>

> [@Astral\_Rejection](#):
>
> Fair enough. Thanks for responding!

Now I’m curious, what terminator thread was it? If you liked it, you really should start the conversation up again. Me likes Terminator. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2012, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/7 "2012-10-09T03:32:37Z")

</div>

> [@Irishman](#):
>
> The only problem with starting a new thread is, theoretically, there were a number of comments that were made that are now gone, and so the new thread won’t have those comments. Perhaps the people will return and remake them, perhaps not.

Exactly. It punishes the other posters in an attempt to snub the sock. Couldn’t you just lock the thread, so that people could still see the other arguments?

And seeing as you have actually kept threads from socks and trolls active, can someone do a comparison to see whether doing anything actually accomplishes anything?

Finally, surely you’ve noticed that the number of threads that are ever restarted is rather low, especially compared to the number of times a thread will continue once the OP is banned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drunky\_Smurf](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drunky_smurf/32/449_2.png) [@Drunky\_Smurf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drunky_Smurf)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2012, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/8 "2012-10-09T15:32:14Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> _snip_  
> , can someone do a comparison to see whether doing anything actually accomplishes anything?

Sure, go for it sport.

> [@](#):
>
> Finally, surely you’ve noticed that the number of threads that are ever restarted is rather low, especially compared to the number of times a thread will continue once the OP is banned.

I have not noticed that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2012, 2:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/9 "2012-10-10T02:32:37Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> It’s intended as a deterrent. If a sock sees all his posts disappeared, he may decide it’s not worth it to create a new sock.

You mean… he _won’t_ be back?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PlainJain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/5daacb/32.png) [@PlainJain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PlainJain)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2012, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/10 "2012-10-10T02:36:47Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> You mean… he _won’t_ be back?

Sublime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2012, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/11 "2012-10-16T11:41:05Z")

</div>

> [@PlainJain](#):
>
> Sublime.

Band name

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2012, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-where-did-the-terminator-thread-go-thread/633452/12 "2012-10-16T14:03:32Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> And seeing as you have actually kept threads from socks and trolls active, can someone do a comparison to see whether doing anything actually accomplishes anything?

> [@Drunky\_Smurf](#):
>
> Sure, go for it sport.

Well, seeing as how what they are trying to accomplish is discouraging socks from returning and denying the sockster a peek back at his handiwork, ISTM that only a mod/admin could see the effect by checking IP logs. To me, it seems unlikely that it has much effect on the former. It’s like a game, and some will tire of it immediately some will be relentless. Also, some are trolls and some are merely people determined to keep posting here.
