[QUOTE=Ravenman]
Rucksinator, I sure hope you’re only arguing this because you’re a fan of that radio show and you’d like to make an excuse to keep them on the air. Because those tweets were extremely offensive, and very racist. It’s not even a debate.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, this is very interesting. I’ve noticed a lot of people taking this “third way,” acknowledging that Cumia has regressed views, but what he said on Twitter wasn’t racist per se. This is the “at least I’m not in the Klan!” defense.
First, it’s fairly likely that this guy was taking pictures of a woman without her consent. The legality of this is irrelevant. It’s creepy behavior.
It appears (from his description) that other people noticed this and berated him as well. Which makes me glad that other people won’t stand by and let this kind of behavior go unchecked. As a father, husband, and son, I would hope other people would jump in if one of my loved ones was being harassed by some random.
If he was in fact attacked by the woman unprovoked, he should have filed a report. Plain and simple. It seems to me that he knew that he’d been busted for taking perv pictures and wouldn’t get much sympathy from NYPD. Simply, he behaved like a cad and was treated thusly.
This unhinged, racist rant that he conducted simply proves that he’s got plenty of opinions on this subject, and fans of the show don’t seem to be surprised in the least that he said those things. I think the surprise to him is that global companies like SiriusXM actually don’t think it’s profitable or good business to employ unrepentant racists. This, to me, is the amazing thing about White privilege. All of this “First Amendment!” discussion is rich because most of us are well aware of the fact that if we embarrass our employer through our behavior, on the clock or otherwise, we’ll likely face strong consequences.
Cumia actually thought that Twitter was an extension of his show. Nope, dumbass, it’s a public forum, and your tweets can be read by anybody. And he’s surprised to learn that many people find his views repugnant and regressive.