# Anthony Weiner may be in serious trouble

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 22, 2016, 11:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571 "2016-09-22T11:12:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2017, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/61 "2017-05-19T22:07:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> The day was marked by an emotional courtroom confession and\*\* news that Weiner’s estranged wife, Huma Abedin, filed for divorce\*\* after a separation that began last year amid the evolving sex scandal. A spokesperson with the Manhattan Supreme Court confirmed that Abedin, a close aide to Hillary Clinton, had filed court papers seeking a divorce.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/19/anthony-weiner-disgraced-former-congressman-expected-to-plead-guilty-today-in-sexting-case-involving-minor/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/19/anthony-weiner-disgraced-former-congressman-expected-to-plead-guilty-today-in-sexting-case-involving-minor/)

Finally!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2017, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/62 "2017-05-19T22:14:08Z")

</div>

Been waiting to make your move?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2017, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/63 "2017-05-19T22:23:39Z")

</div>

In other news, Hillary said she had an important announcement that she’ll be making on _Ellen_ next week. Bill is off in Cancun somewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/64 "2017-05-20T02:19:34Z")

</div>

Oh. There’s so much older stuff on the page right now, this doesn’t come up as an older thread with the extension. I thought he’d done something new, not just the consequences for his previous actions.

> [@marshmallow](#):
>
> Nearest I can tell, aside from narcissism and dominance signaling, is it’s the typical mind fallacy at work. Guys are visually oriented and would like it if women sent naked pics to them, so they assume women would appreciate the same. These men may see signs of this not being true in the wider culture, but may just dismiss it as examples of women laboring under the double standard and having to keep up a front while believing differently in private.

I could believe that, but there’s one more snafu. I at least don’t really want random women sending me pictures of just their vagina, either. A nude pic? Sure. But just the vagina? That’s kinda too far.

Am I unusual in this? I already know I’m unusual in not liking to see penises in my porn, and not liking it when they zoom in on just the genitals. I want to see the person and reactions, while also seeing what they are doing.

To me, it would make a whole lot more sense if guys just sent risque pics, showing off their physique. That would be analogous to what I might find fun from a random lady.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![friedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8edcca/32.png) [@friedo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/friedo)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/65 "2017-05-20T03:00:47Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/19/anthony-weiner-disgraced-former-congressman-expected-to-plead-guilty-today-in-sexting-case-involving-minor/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/19/anthony-weiner-disgraced-former-congressman-expected-to-plead-guilty-today-in-sexting-case-involving-minor/)
> 
> Finally!

Makes sense for her to wait until after his conviction. It gives her leverage in the divorce.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drunky\_Smurf](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drunky_smurf/32/449_2.png) [@Drunky\_Smurf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drunky_Smurf)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 5:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/66 "2017-05-20T05:34:28Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Oh. There’s so much older stuff on the page right now, this doesn’t come up as an older thread with the extension. I thought he’d done something new, not just the consequences for his previous actions.
> 
> I could believe that, but there’s one more snafu. I at least don’t really want random women sending me pictures of just their vagina, either. A nude pic? Sure. But just the vagina? That’s kinda too far.
> 
> Am I unusual in this? I already know I’m unusual in not liking to see penises in my porn, and not liking it when they zoom in on just the genitals. I want to see the person and reactions, while also seeing what they are doing.
> 
> To me, it would make a whole lot more sense if guys just sent risque pics, showing off their physique. That would be analogous to what I might find fun from a random lady.

Anything else you’d like to share about your love life?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 7:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/67 "2017-05-20T07:23:50Z")

</div>

Don’t relate to the idea of sending pictures of your dick to anyone. What the hell for, if you have to send a picture…well, you’re not there, are you? Most men aren’t that proud of it, are they?

Maybe that Freud thing about penis envy is exactly backwards, maybe its shame, and that’s why we are always looking for someplace to hide it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/68 "2017-05-20T15:07:13Z")

</div>

[Here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=610638&highlight=Weiner) is the thread I started when Weiner initially denied doing anything wrong, blaming it on his account being hacked.

You could not write a book about a guy with that name doing what he did and get it published. Too impossible to be believed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/69 "2017-05-20T15:29:44Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Don’t relate to the idea of sending pictures of your dick to anyone. What the hell for, if you have to send a picture…well, you’re not there, are you? Most men aren’t that proud of it, are they?
> 
> Maybe that Freud thing about penis envy is exactly backwards, maybe its shame, and that’s why we are always looking for someplace to hide it.

Does that jitterbug phone take pictures now? 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/70 "2017-05-20T18:49:25Z")

</div>

First you gotta take the roll to the Fotomat, wait at home for the call, pick up the prints and negatives— and how the hell do you even get one into the phone, anyway? Slot’s way too small, even for wallet size.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nawth\_Chucka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c57346/32.png) [@Nawth\_Chucka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nawth_Chucka)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2017, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/71 "2017-05-20T19:45:15Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Oh. There’s so much older stuff on the page right now, this doesn’t come up as an older thread with the extension. I thought he’d done something new, not just the consequences for his previous actions.
> 
> I could believe that, but there’s one more snafu. I at least don’t really want random women sending me pictures of just their **vagina** , either. A nude pic? Sure. But just the **vagina**? That’s kinda too far.
> 
> Am I unusual in this? I already know I’m unusual in not liking to see penises in my porn, and not liking it when they zoom in on just the genitals. I want to see the person and reactions, while also seeing what they are doing.
> 
> To me, it would make a whole lot more sense if guys just sent risque pics, showing off their physique. That would be analogous to what I might find fun from a random lady.

Bolding mine - the word I believe you’re looking for here is \*\*vulva \*\*; this mixup is a common mistake. The vagina is inside the body, the vulva is the area outside the body. She’d need a speculum camera to snap pics of her vagina; that would be kinda too far (inside)!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Not\_Carlson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/bc79bd/32.png) [@Not\_Carlson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Not_Carlson)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 10:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/72 "2017-05-22T10:48:04Z")

</div>

> [@Drunky\_Smurf](#):
>
> As a registered sex offender he may never get the chance.

It’s always informative to hear from experience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/73 "2017-05-22T22:03:20Z")

</div>

\*\*  
THE VULVA BRIGADE STRIKES AGAIN!\*\*

> [@Nawth\_Chucka](#):
>
> Bolding mine - the word I believe you’re looking for here is \*\*vulva \*\*; this mixup is a common mistake. The vagina is inside the body, the vulva is the area outside the body. She’d need a speculum camera to snap pics of her vagina; that would be kinda too far (inside)!

Seriously, dude, everybody is aware of the distinction. BigT was obviously using it in the colloquial sense, just like most everybody else does. Lord, you people are tiring.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paranoid\_Randroid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/paranoid_randroid/32/18_2.png) [@Paranoid\_Randroid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paranoid_Randroid)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 10:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/74 "2017-05-22T22:21:55Z")

</div>

Interestingly, I find self righteous complaints about how tiring pedantry is to be in itself tiring. How deep can we go?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malleus\_Incus\_Stapes](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/malleus_incus_stapes/32/3293_2.png) [@Malleus\_Incus\_Stapes](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malleus_Incus_Stapes)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/75 "2017-05-22T22:31:17Z")

</div>

^That’s what [del]she[/del] Anthony said! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nawth\_Chucka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c57346/32.png) [@Nawth\_Chucka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nawth_Chucka)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/76 "2017-05-22T22:57:38Z")

</div>

> [@Green\_Bean](#):
>
> THE VULVA BRIGADE STRIKES AGAIN!
> 
> Seriously, dude, everybody is aware of the distinction. BigT was obviously using it in the colloquial sense, just like most everybody else does. Lord, you people are tiring.

B/c fuck knowing what parts of a woman’s body are called, right? Who in their right mind would bother respecting ANY part enough to give a damn, huh? It’s not as though they’re attached to people that matter or else they’d just be dicks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emcee2k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7bcc69/32.png) [@emcee2k](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/emcee2k)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2017, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/77 "2017-05-22T23:15:27Z")

</div>

> [@Nawth\_Chucka](#):
>
> B/c fuck knowing what parts of a woman’s body are called, right? Who in their right mind would bother respecting ANY part enough to give a damn, huh? It’s not as though they’re attached to people that matter or else they’d just be dicks.

Oh, ffs.

Sent from my ASUS\_X008DC using Tapatalk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2017, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/78 "2017-05-23T01:22:00Z")

</div>

> [@Nawth\_Chucka](#):
>
> B/c fuck knowing what parts of a woman’s body are called, right? Who in their right mind would bother respecting ANY part enough to give a damn, huh? It’s not as though they’re attached to people that matter or else they’d just be dicks.

I’m a cisgendered woman, sweetcheeks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nawth\_Chucka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c57346/32.png) [@Nawth\_Chucka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nawth_Chucka)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2017, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/79 "2017-05-23T02:00:56Z")

</div>

> [@Green\_Bean](#):
>
> I’m a cisgendered woman, sweetcheeks.

What does that have to do w/ the matter at hand? 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rigamarole](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/77aa72/32.png) [@Rigamarole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rigamarole)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2017, 6:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571/80 "2017-05-23T06:38:48Z")

</div>

> [@Nawth\_Chucka](#):
>
> Bolding mine - the word I believe you’re looking for here is \*\*vulva \*\*; this mixup is a common mistake. The vagina is inside the body, the vulva is the area outside the body. She’d need a speculum camera to snap pics of her vagina; that would be kinda too far (inside)!

Wow, seriously?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anthony-weiner-may-be-in-serious-trouble/766571.md?page=5)
