Does the anti-abortion crowd ever pause to consider how many are alive today that were conceived and raised in better circumstances because their mother had an abortion.
16 year old gets pregant, has baby, lives on welfare. When the child is 15, she has a baby, lives on welfare.
16 year old gets pregnant, has abortion, finishes school, gets good job, marries and has three children, who are raised to work and better themselves.
Some do, many do not. All too often, you see statistics of how many more people there would be, or how many more people of some demographic, if we didn’t have abortion.
Yes. Or, that it is a person, but that the sort of person defined as a fetus doesn’t get the same kinds of considerations that a non-fetus person gets.
Which is it? Do you want adoption cheaper and easier, or do you want to have better screening to weed out more people? Because you can’t do both at the same time.
I’m pro-life but pro-birth control. In my opinion, human life is not actually be produced until the dna from the sperm and egg unite. Correct? Ending life is wrong in my mind. I always think adoption is a better choice. However, I know orphanages are overrun. A sad lose/lose situation for the kids.