This thread is leaning towards a reaction to the implication that “color” correlates to the “badness” of a neighborhood.
I can see how some of you might suspect that was my intent, so let me state clearly that was not.
I purposely chose to ask about neighborhoods rather than ghettos & barrios to avoid that correlation. But, it didn’t work.
<digression>Anyway, to me ghetto means an area that has become obviously homogeneous. In my world, the talk lately is of the relatively new phenomenon of “gay ghettos” and whether that’s healthy or not. No one fears for their life walking through a gay ghetto, although there is the risk of vicious drive-by fashion consultancies. </digression>
I know it’s a fine line I’m teetering on. The most dangerous neighborhoods usually are one color neighborhoods. So I asked whether any of these dangerous one color neighborhoods happen to be white.
Only a moron would assume: one color neighborhood = that color is bad any more than: white neighborhood = whites are bad. I might be a moron, but please don’t class me a moron based on my making that assumption.
You take any group of people, take away the jobs, take away their access to decent law enforcement, health care, social services & education, let it devolve into a cesspool of drugs, crime & violence and voila! Bad, dangerous neighborhood.
There are a lot of issues to take into consideration. But, I don’t want to get into that hear. It’s been discussed before. A lot.
I just wanted to know if there are “bad”, dangerous white neighborhoods. Apparently now there may be a few, although I’m still not convinced they’re so dangerous you seriously risk getting shot or stabbed just by going there. Intimidated, harassed, yes. But so dangerous even the police, EMTs & postal carriers don’t want to go there?