# Any good live-action space-opera type movies/TV shows without artificial gravity?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [April 27, 2009, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524 "2009-04-27T17:26:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mops](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mops/32/16494_2.png) [@Mops](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mops)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/1 "2009-04-27T17:26:25Z")

</div>

The thing that works most against my suspension of disbelief in space opera movies is that gravity is the one thing that never fails. I don’t need a real hard SF premise - hyperspace travel and really powerful realspace drives are OK, or the action would all be in our small backyard, which e.g. _2001_ did well), but artificial gravity, especially artificial gravity that does not fail when everything else does, is just too convenient IMO.

Any recommendations?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/2 "2009-04-27T17:34:56Z")

</div>

> [@tschild](#):
>
> The thing that works most against my suspension of disbelief in space opera movies is that gravity is the one thing that never fails. I don’t need a real hard SF premise - hyperspace travel and really powerful realspace drives are OK, or the action would all be in our small backyard, which e.g. _2001_ did well), but artificial gravity, especially artificial gravity that does not fail when everything else does, is just too convenient IMO.
> 
> Any recommendations?

I can’t think of any offhand, though something old is nagging at me. I think that Apollo 13 (not really space opera) did it fairly well for historical verisimilitude.

The problem is that for any productions filmed here on terra firma, even simulating null-G is really an expensive ‘stunt.’ There have been a few shows that have done it as a novelty, (Enterprise had a fun teaser in the first season with the gravity going on the fritz in the captain’s shower, with water drops bouncing slowly up and all,) but no matter how ‘unbelievable’ it may be, it’s just not worth the effort to do an extended space sequence that way in any futuristic setting where you could conceivably make up artificial G.

Many books, without those practical constraints, have done it well, and possibly a sci-fi radio drama could use complaints about getting around in null-G as a running gag. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/3 "2009-04-27T17:37:57Z")

</div>

Either _Red Planet_ or _Mission to Mars_ (can’t remember which is which, both were 2000 flicks with similar premises) was realistic in that regards : the artificial gravity aboard the spaceship was created by spinning the habitat around a fixed axis. When the engines powering the rotation fails, so does the artificial gravity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/4 "2009-04-27T17:39:13Z")

</div>

Was going to say 2001 actually, which had artificial gravity but also has some weightless scenes. I feel your pain, that always annoyed me about Star Trek, the ship could be completely powerless, but still have gravity (of course, can’t really blame them, I’m sure any sort of weightlessness effect that was within their budget would be distractingly bad).

Actually, now that I think about it, the last Star Trek movie with the original cast had a pretty sweet scene where a damaged Klingon ship looses gravity.

But as far as a show where a spaceship has consistent weightlessness, I got nothing. Maybe someone who watches more anime then I do knows of one. Seems like that would be a natural place to look, anyways, since you don’t really need expensive special effects to draw people weightless.

ETA: Another one that hardly counts: Contact’s one scene in the Mir space-station is weightless. Course the Mir is (or was) a real space station, so they could hardly do it otherwise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/5 "2009-04-27T17:39:20Z")

</div>

In _Babylon 5_, the Earthers didn’t have artificial gravity technology, and so simulated it by spinning the station. And really, there’s no way that kind of artificial gravity can fail, without the entire station being destroyed. They did have some more advanced races with artificial gravity, though (which never seemed to fail no matter how badly the ship was damaged), and there were a few continuity glitches where people are seen standing and walking around on ships that shouldn’t have had artificial gravity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/6 "2009-04-27T17:43:47Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> In _Babylon 5_, the Earthers didn’t have artificial gravity technology, and so simulated it by spinning the station. And really, there’s no way that kind of artificial gravity can fail, without the entire station being destroyed.

Or without the piece of the station that you’re in coming loose and shooting out on an inertial straight-line course. If the gravity suddenly goes away on a spinning space station, you should know that’s what’s happened to you.

What you do about it is a different story. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/7 "2009-04-27T18:53:11Z")

</div>

Stuff without artificial gravity:

\*\*2001

2010

Destination Moon

Operation Moonbase

Man Into Space (TV series)

Conquest of Space  
\*\*  
I note that two of those are based an Arthur C. Clarke novels (you can quibble about 2001, but it’ds ultimately based on The Sentinel), and two on Heinlein works. And Jerome Bixby wrote for Man Into Space. SF writers liked accuracy. TV and movies didn’t because, to quote from Heinlein’s own essay on the making of Destination Moon, "the answer to almost every question in Hollywood that starts with ‘Why don’t they…?’ is ‘Money.’ " Zero G is expensive, as Heinlein’s essay and Jerome Agel’s book **The Making of 2001** will easily show.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/8 "2009-04-27T20:48:28Z")

</div>

The British serious _Star Cops_ (much more serious than its title suggests) at least acknowledged the problem, even if they couldn’t address is consistently with their low budgets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/9 "2009-04-27T20:56:20Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Either _Red Planet_ or _Mission to Mars_ (can’t remember which is which, both were 2000 flicks with similar premises) was realistic in that regards : the artificial gravity aboard the spaceship was created by spinning the habitat around a fixed axis. **When the engines powering the rotation fails, so does the artificial gravity.**

Gah. That’s even dumber than just ignoring the issue to begin with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/10 "2009-04-27T21:01:14Z")

</div>

Yeah, if the rotation mechanism fails, then what you’ll end up with is the entire ship rotating more slowly. And that’s assuming that there’s a significant portion of the ship that isn’t rotating, when you needn’t have any such part.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/11 "2009-04-27T22:27:33Z")

</div>

Courtesy of David Szondy’s [Tales of Future Past:](http://davidszondy.com/future/futurepast.htm)

There’s the old BBC series [_Moonbase Three._](http://davidszondy.com/future/moonbase3/moonbase_3.htm) If that counts; the Moon **has** gravity, after all.

And [_Conquest of Space,_](http://davidszondy.com/future/conquest/conquest.htm) which was really more of a dramatized documentary.

And [_Moon Zero Two._](http://davidszondy.com/future/moon_zero_two/moon_zero_two.htm)

Hijack: Y’know what I’d like to see? A basic-cable network that would be a fusion of the Sci-Fi Channel, TVLand and Turner Classic Movies. I.e., nothing but **old** SF movies and TV shows. There’s plenty of material out there – much of it never seen by most contemporary viewers – to fill out the hours.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/12 "2009-04-27T22:35:16Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> The British serious _Star Cops_ (much more serious than its title suggests) at least acknowledged the problem, even if they couldn’t address is consistently with their low budgets.

That’s the one I was going to mention. I don’t remember any inconsistencies with zero-G. Much of it took place on the moon, and I never saw any attempt to portray less-than-one-G.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icerigger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icerigger/32/432_2.png) [@Icerigger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icerigger)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/13 "2009-04-27T22:55:47Z")

</div>

**Moonraker**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/14 "2009-04-27T23:06:45Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> And Conquest of Space, which was really more of a dramatized documentary.

I mentioned it above. George Pal made it, so I sort of think of it as fallout from Destination Moon (and Pal was already set up for zero-G effects). But DM was more of a documentary – Conquest of Space gave us a religious-nut commander who almost sabotaged his own mission to Mars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icerigger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icerigger/32/432_2.png) [@Icerigger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icerigger)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/15 "2009-04-27T23:12:21Z")

</div>

In **The Black Hole** while the Cygnus had AG the Palomino did not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/16 "2009-04-27T23:21:30Z")

</div>

I’ll second Babylon 5, at least in part.

I believe the Centauri have artificial gravity, but the Humans/Earthers don’t. I

Did the Minbari have artifical gravity?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icerigger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icerigger/32/432_2.png) [@Icerigger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icerigger)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2009, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/17 "2009-04-27T23:22:50Z")

</div>

Yes, but the Narns do not.

Also Earth2, the original if anybody remembers that.😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dirkmorocco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ee7513/32.png) [@dirkmorocco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dirkmorocco)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2009, 12:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/18 "2009-04-28T12:30:31Z")

</div>

When ZeroG Corporation launched a few years ago the hope was that people would be lined up to utilize them, to film movies, TV shows, commercials, music videos, whatever. Except for a very few cases, that has not happened. Mainly because of the cost, but also because it’s just not very practical. It is advertised as “up to 30 seconds” of zero g at at time, but it’s closer to 20. And it is not consistent. People float up and hit the ceiling, then drop to the floor, then float towards the front of the plane, then to the back. Would be difficult to piece together a realistic looking scene when you’re only getting a few seconds of usable footage per parabola.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uosdwis\_R.Dewoh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Uosdwis\_R.Dewoh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uosdwis_R.Dewoh)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2009, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/19 "2009-04-28T12:51:47Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Yeah, if the rotation mechanism fails, then what you’ll end up with is the entire ship rotating more slowly. And that’s assuming that there’s a significant portion of the ship that isn’t rotating, when you needn’t have any such part.

The ship in _Red planet_ had two habitats spinning in opposite directions to stop the rest of the ship from rotating. An engine failure as depicted in the film would result in weightlessness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dirkmorocco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ee7513/32.png) [@dirkmorocco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dirkmorocco)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2009, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524/20 "2009-04-28T14:34:51Z")

</div>

Oh, and don’t forget the greatest movie ever made, Barbarella.

There was a movie called Thieves and Prostitutes that, legend has it, was approved by the Russians to be filmed aboard Mir, and it was to include a love scene. An actor and actress went through astronaut training, but then Mir came down and that was the end of that. They went ahead and made it anyway using special effects instead. It was actually pretty well done.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-good-live-action-space-opera-type-movies-tv-shows-without-artificial-gravity/494524.md?page=2)
