# Any sitcoms in which the protagonists end up in a lower economic class at the end?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [May 19, 2016, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168 "2016-05-19T15:41:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/1 "2016-05-19T15:41:43Z")

</div>

In general, sitcom characters tend to end up staying largely the same or they get more successful and accomplished as the show runs. Are there examples of shows that do the opposite and have a main sitcom character deteriorate in economic well being as the show progresses?

Shows in which the main character is rich for the first 10 minutes of the pilot and then suddenly become poor don’t count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_R.Mortiss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tim_r.mortiss/32/142_2.png) [@Tim\_R.Mortiss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_R.Mortiss)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/2 "2016-05-19T15:44:00Z")

</div>

That doesn’t sound very conducive to comedy, does it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr\_Shine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr_shine/32/464_2.png) [@Mr\_Shine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr_Shine)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/3 "2016-05-19T15:47:38Z")

</div>

Not really the same, but Edmund the Black Adder, [del]heir presumptive[/del] second in line to the English throne becomes Lord Blackadder a favourite of the English monarch, then a servant to the prince regent of the UK, before being a captain in the British army.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/4 "2016-05-19T15:52:03Z")

</div>

Seinfeld - the main characters all ended up on prison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miss\_Mapp](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miss_mapp/32/369_2.png) [@Miss\_Mapp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miss_Mapp)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/5 "2016-05-19T15:52:32Z")

</div>

Doesn’t Reg Perrin end up giving up everything again at or near the end of his series?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/6 "2016-05-19T15:52:57Z")

</div>

In _Lucky Louie_, the family was already poor, but towards the end Louie quit his job. In the following episode, IIRC, his wife (a nurse, the chief breadwinner) left him, so Louie was pretty much fucked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/7 "2016-05-19T15:55:50Z")

</div>

> [@Mr\_Shine](#):
>
> Not really the same, but Edmund the Black Adder, [del]heir presumptive[/del] second in line to the English throne becomes Lord Blackadder a favourite of the English monarch, then a servant to the prince regent of the UK, before being a captain in the British army.

To being King Edmund III and eventually ruler of the known universe. So no. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Casey1505](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/dc4da7/32.png) [@Casey1505](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Casey1505)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/8 "2016-05-19T16:10:49Z")

</div>

[Joe Millionaire](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0348949/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/9 "2016-05-19T16:28:52Z")

</div>

> [@Tim\_R.Mortiss](#):
>
> That doesn’t sound very conducive to comedy, does it?

IIRC, Sam originally owned the bar on **Cheers** , and after several seasons sold it, and promptly blew through all the money – and eventually came back to ask for a job pouring drinks and supervising the servers like before, only as a hired hand.

So they could do the will-they-or-won’t-they stuff again – but without just doing a flat retread of Diane’s storyline, because now he was an employee pursuing his boss; and she was pursuing _her_ boss, who seemed to genuinely enjoy having Sam around. So it opened up storytelling possibilities, after they’d spent years on _yep, he owns a bar._

(Granted, that maybe doesn’t technically count for this thread since IIRC he got the bar back years later – but I figure it answers your question; if you eventually need some new ideas for the main character in a sitcom, it seems you can put him in a better financial situation or a worse one as you prefer.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/10 "2016-05-19T16:36:08Z")

</div>

The economic situation of the Bluths on _Arrested Development_ got worse and worse as time went on, although they all tried to keep living as if they were still rich.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/11 "2016-05-19T16:44:57Z")

</div>

_The Pruitts of Southampton_ had that as the basic premise, and things didn’t get any better over the short run of the series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/12 "2016-05-19T16:51:00Z")

</div>

Earl had several reversals of fortune on _My Name Is Earl_, first winning the lottery, then spending all his money and ending up in prison for a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Lowry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@Sam\_Lowry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Lowry)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/13 "2016-05-19T17:07:50Z")

</div>

On It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, siblings Dee and Dennis Reynolds came from a richer background, but for various reasons don’t have as much money anymore. They weren’t shown as rich at the beginning of the show, but they seemed more comfortably middle class, but seem more working class now. Their father Frank does still have money because of his business dealings but basically chooses to live in squalor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/14 "2016-05-19T17:53:06Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> In _Lucky Louie_, the family was already poor, but towards the end Louie quit his job. In the following episode, IIRC, his wife (a nurse, the chief breadwinner) left him, so Louie was pretty much fucked.

Lucky Louie is a great example and I wish it got more than one season so we could see how far into squalor Louis CK was willing to take it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/15 "2016-05-19T18:48:13Z")

</div>

I don’t think any of the castaways on _Gilligan’s Island_ improved their lot during the regular run of the show. The Skipper (boatless) and Ginger (several years out of the public eye) would have certainly been worse off at the end.

I know that there were people trying to claim the Howell’s fortune during the run of the show. Did any of those succeed?

The Professor would have fallen behind in all the fields he was an expert in. Would have quite a chore re-establishing his career afterwards.

Mary Ann would be about the same.

Gilligan, OTOH, might be able to make a killing after rescuing selling all those indestructible hats and shirts he seems to have invented.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/16 "2016-05-19T18:55:58Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> The Professor would have fallen behind in all the fields he was an expert in. Would have quite a chore re-establishing his career afterwards.

The Professor will be just fine. Is cancer a hole in the side of a boat? No, it’s not. Therefore, the Professor can cure cancer with coconuts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sampiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2acd7d/32.png) [@Sampiro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sampiro)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/17 "2016-05-19T19:06:00Z")

</div>

The current sitcom [Schitt’s Creek](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3526078/) has this plot. A megarich family (Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara, Dan Levy [Levy’s real life lookalike son], Annie Murphy) whose fortune came from video stores loses everything due to the collapse of the video market, an embezzling business manager, and an IRS debt and ends up living in a fleabag motel in a tiny town he once bought as a joke.

_Ellen_- the Ellen Degeneres sitcom in which she made history by coming out- began with her owning a successful bookstore which at some point she lost and started working temp jobs.

Both _Roseanne_ and _All in the Family_ (the two best blue collar sitcoms ever imo) had roller coaster financial arcs, with the family sometimes doing okay, sometimes slightly better, and sometimes flat broke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 7:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/18 "2016-05-19T19:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@Sampiro](#):
>
> The current sitcom [Schitt’s Creek](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3526078/) has this plot. A megarich family (Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara, Dan Levy [Levy’s real life lookalike son], Annie Murphy) whose fortune came from video stores loses everything due to the collapse of the video market, an embezzling business manager, and an IRS debt and ends up living in a fleabag motel in a tiny town he once bought as a joke.

Schitt’s Creek appears to fall under the “only rich for 10 minutes in the pilot” trope which is different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/19 "2016-05-19T19:32:56Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> The Professor would have fallen behind in all the fields he was an expert in. Would have quite a chore re-establishing his career afterwards.

Yep. This was addressed in \*Rescue from Gilligan’s Island \*; he kept trying to invent things only to discover that someone beat him to them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168/20 "2016-05-19T19:50:10Z")

</div>

> [@RealityChuck](#):
>
> _The Pruitts of Southampton_ had that as the basic premise, and things didn’t get any better over the short run of the series.

Bad show with great theme song.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/any-sitcoms-in-which-the-protagonists-end-up-in-a-lower-economic-class-at-the-end/755168.md?page=2)
